Met refuses to remove controversial painting

[vuduchile 1,940]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/nyc-museum-refuses-remove-controversial-painting-girl-230117969.html

 

But its art!

 

Tell that to Jared.

[Baker Boy 1,477]

I see nothing controversial about that painting.

[Patriotsfatboy1 1,432]

I see nothing controversial about that painting.

 

Exactly. Unless you were a Muslim or Puritan.

[fandandy 3,311]

Were that painted today it would be titled Johnny in a Chair.

[TommyGavin 788]

I'd do her

[kilroy69 993]

I am actually really impressed with the METS response to this.

[frank 2,144]

I'd do her

She's gotta be 90 by now.

[titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745]

There should be some legal process by which you can drag women like the petition writer into court, demonstrate that they clearly have too much free time, and have them court ordered to do community service.

 

Maybe that would shut all these loser focking constantly offenses tvvats up.

[vuduchile 1,940]

I am actually really impressed with the METS response to this.

I was too, especially since the Met is surely run by a buncha shrieking c0ck tuckers.

[titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745]

I was too, especially since the Met is surely run by a buncha shrieking c0ck tuckers.

Sure. But they are arrogant art snob c0cktuckers. NOBODY criticizes their art taste.

 

Not to mention you gotta figure the board that runs the place is some of the richest mofos around. And one of em probably paid a lot of money for that painting.

[vuduchile 1,940]

Sure. But they are arrogant art snob c0cktuckers. NOBODY criticizes their art taste.

 

Not to mention you gotta figure the board that runs the place is some of the richest mofos around. And one of em probably paid a lot of money for that painting.

 

GFIAFP should immediately run toward the Met and give us a full report.