mmmmm...beer 691 Posted January 21, 2017 Finally! This was posted today on the whitehouse.gov website. https://www.whitehouse.gov/law-enforcement-community Fockin aye rights! Standing Up For Our Law Enforcement Community One of the fundamental rights of every American is to live in a safe community. A Trump Administration will empower our law enforcement officers to do their jobs and keep our streets free of crime and violence. The Trump Administration will be a law and order administration. President Trump will honor our men and women in uniform and will support their mission of protecting the public. The dangerous anti-police atmosphere in America is wrong. The Trump Administration will end it. The Trump Administration is committed to reducing violent crime. In 2015, homicides increased by 17% in Americas fifty largest cities. Thats the largest increase in 25 years. In our nations capital, killings have risen by 50 percent. There were thousands of shootings in Chicago last year alone. Our country needs more law enforcement, more community engagement, and more effective policing. Our job is not to make life more comfortable for the rioter, the looter, or the violent disrupter. Our job is to make life more comfortable for parents who want their kids to be able to walk the streets safely. Or the senior citizen waiting for a bus. Or the young child walking home from school. Supporting law enforcement means supporting our citizens ability to protect themselves. We will uphold Americans Second Amendment rights at every level of our judicial system. President Trump is committed to building a border wall to stop illegal immigration, to stop the gangs and the violence, and to stop the drugs from pouring into our communities. He is dedicated to enforcing our border laws, ending sanctuary cities, and stemming the tide of lawlessness associated with illegal immigration. Supporting law enforcement also means deporting illegal aliens with violent criminal records who have remained within our borders. It is the first duty of government to keep the innocent safe, and President Donald Trump will fight for the safety of every American, and especially those Americans who have not known safe neighborhoods for a very long time. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,631 Posted January 21, 2017 I understand Melanoma's clothing, modeling and jewelry line are on that same website. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 4,554 Posted January 21, 2017 It's nice to see the president has the police community's back again. One of President Obama's greatest flaws was sympathizing with the sh*tbag protesters in Ferguson and elsewhere. President Trump has many well-known flaws but his position on policing and law-and-order made up a l lot of ground for him. Liberals wonder how anybody can support Donald Trump, for me, this issue alone works for miles and miles and miles on end. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,593 Posted January 21, 2017 Real leadership. What a difference. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted January 21, 2017 Everyone in NY benefited and continues to benefit from Guiliani's practices. Few will admit it. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,593 Posted January 21, 2017 Everyone in NY benefited and continues to benefit from Guiliani's practices. Few will admit it. So true Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,631 Posted January 21, 2017 First, Donald Trump will authorize the annual Purge. Make no mistake, President Trump is not copying the movie, the movie copied president trumps idea that he had years and years and years ago believe me it's incredible. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
trumpurethra 42 Posted January 21, 2017 Stop it with "pro police, anti police" bs. Most cops are good cops. In fact just like any other profession, 95% of the people are good people. But the 5% is bad and needs to be relieved of their duties. If you shoot an unarmed suspect at the very least you need to be terminated immediately. The situation with indictments and trials should be fixed but that is a long and difficult process. In the meantime just can the sh!tbags and the problem will take care of itself. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alias Detective 1,179 Posted January 21, 2017 Stop it with "pro police, anti police" bs. Most cops are good cops. In fact just like any other profession, 95% of the people are good people. But the 5% is bad and needs to be relieved of their duties. If you shoot an unarmed suspect at the very least you need to be terminated immediately. The situation with indictments and trials should be fixed but that is a long and difficult process. In the meantime just can the sh!tbags and the problem will take care of itself. So if you don't possess a gun you can't be shot by police? That's sound. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,080 Posted January 21, 2017 Stop it with "pro police, anti police" bs. Most cops are good cops. In fact just like any other profession, 95% of the people are good people. But the 5% is bad and needs to be relieved of their duties. If you shoot an unarmed suspect at the very least you need to be terminated immediately. The situation with indictments and trials should be fixed but that is a long and difficult process. In the meantime just can the sh!tbags and the problem will take care of itself. Fock you Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
trumpurethra 42 Posted January 21, 2017 So if you don't possess a gun you can't be shot by police! That's sound. I said unarmed. Last time I checked the definition of unarmed includes all weapons (knives, bats, nunchuks, etc). Basically any weapon. And yes, if you shoot someone with nothing in their hands you should be fired lol. Seems pretty basic to me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rholio 339 Posted January 21, 2017 Saying the right things. Note- unarmed doesn't mean cooperative. When the rapist jumps up and runs instead of stopping as ordered, fire away. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alias Detective 1,179 Posted January 21, 2017 I said unarmed. Last time I checked the definition of unarmed includes all weapons (knives, bats, nunchuks, etc). Basically any weapon. And yes, if you shoot someone with nothing in their hands you should be fired lol. Seems pretty basic to me. Not me, sorry. And I'll tend to believe the cops first. It's a shame you believe the dirtbag criminal first. It's a difference some never will understand, you being one of them apparently. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,593 Posted January 21, 2017 I said unarmed. Last time I checked the definition of unarmed includes all weapons (knives, bats, nunchuks, etc). Basically any weapon. And yes, if you shoot someone with nothing in their hands you should be fired lol. Seems pretty basic to me. What if they have the cops throat in their hands? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rholio 339 Posted January 21, 2017 What if they have the cops throat in their hands? If both hands are on the cops throat, they'd be unarmed, right? No harm, no foul apparently. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted January 21, 2017 I, for one would like to thank all the Obama, BLM protesters, cop killers, the liberal media and their race baiting. Had all of them taken the high road, we might not have seen Trump elected. It galvanized middle class America and first time voters to stand up for what was right and tell them via Trump to FOCK OFF. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted January 21, 2017 I said unarmed. Last time I checked the definition of unarmed includes all weapons (knives, bats, nunchuks, etc). Basically any weapon. And yes, if you shoot someone with nothing in their hands you should be fired lol. Seems pretty basic to me. Have you seen the real pics of Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin? Not the picture from when they were 12 either. They're focking huge compared to the guys they were assaulting. And we all know the beating doesn't stop once you're down. Then comes the kicking to the head and stomping. I'd love to see you getting the sh!t kicked out of you by one of these animals and you despite being armed, don't defend yourself with all that you have. Focking pacifist liberals are part of what's wrong with this country. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted January 21, 2017 Saying the right things. Note- unarmed doesn't mean cooperative. When the rapist jumps up and runs instead of stopping as ordered, fire away. Really...shoot an unarmed person who is running away? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,593 Posted January 21, 2017 Really...shoot an unarmed person who is running away? It's legal in some instances. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 5,877 Posted January 21, 2017 Have you seen the real pics of Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin? Not the picture from when they were 12 either. They're focking huge compared to the guys they were assaulting. And we all know the beating doesn't stop once you're down. Then comes the kicking to the head and stomping. I'd love to see you getting the sh!t kicked out of you by one of these animals and you despite being armed, don't defend yourself with all that you have. Focking pacifist liberals are part of what's wrong with this country. Trayvon wasn't shot by a cop. HTH Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted January 21, 2017 I said unarmed. Last time I checked the definition of unarmed includes all weapons (knives, bats, nunchuks, etc). Basically any weapon. And yes, if you shoot someone with nothing in their hands you should be fired lol. Seems pretty basic to me. Trayvon wasn't shot by a cop. HTH Ah..........another Left winger who can't read or distorting responses. I was responding to the bold part of trumpurethra's post about someone with nothing in their hands being 'unarmed'. If you want I can draw a picture of how the example of Trayvon is pertinent. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rholio 339 Posted January 22, 2017 Really...shoot an unarmed person who is running away? Really. The guy shoplifting, no. The girl stealing make-up, no.The guy leaving Grandma's body on the street, yes. Context matters. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted January 22, 2017 Really. The guy shoplifting, no. The girl stealing make-up, no.The guy leaving Grandma's body on the street, yes. Context matters. Yes...your context never mentioned leaving grandmas body o the street did it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,631 Posted January 22, 2017 I'd be strongly in favor of Trump directing his DOJ to mandate body cams for all police forces. Yeah, you'd run into some state's rights things - but just like the speed limit, it's amazing how quickly the states drop that particular argument - as soon as they face losing federal funding. Body Cams aren't the End All and Be All, but they damn sure would shut up a lot of lying BLM's and make crooked cops think twice before acting. I'd also like to see the DOJ put a time limit on "officer involved shooting investigations'. If the cops are clean? They should want timely findings. If they're dirty? Cut down on the length of time BLM gets to let that Bee in their Bonnet can keep buzzing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted January 22, 2017 I'd be strongly in favor of Trump directing his DOJ to mandate body cams for all police forces. Yeah, you'd run into some state's rights things - but just like the speed limit, it's amazing how quickly the states drop that particular argument - as soon as they face losing federal funding. Sidebar: Would you be in favor of mandating photo ID for all states Polling stations? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shorepatrol 1,735 Posted January 22, 2017 First, Donald Trump will authorize the annual Purge. I hope so. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 5,172 Posted January 22, 2017 I continue to be amazed by the shallowness of the left's ability to process Trump proactively being "pro-police." That doesn't mean cops can go and beat people up at will; it means that he is sending a message to first responders that he and his administration appreciate what they do and care about them. Do any of you know a first responder? If so, likely he/she hates Obama. Those roles became less desired under Obama. Jeebus libs, rub two brain cells together. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shorepatrol 1,735 Posted January 22, 2017 Jeebus libs, rub two brain cells together. Too busy foaming at the mouth and doubling down on focking stupid. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gocolts 300 Posted January 22, 2017 Finally! This was posted today on the whitehouse.gov website. https://www.whitehouse.gov/law-enforcement-community Fockin aye rights! Hell yeah. Very refreshing and definitely helped Trump throughout the campaign, respecting what the police officers do while the other side openly bashed the police at campaign rallies. Hopefully this will help with moral some too after the beating they have been taking in the media and the politicians last few years. Hell, even the President would take shots at them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rholio 339 Posted January 22, 2017 Yes...your context never mentioned leaving grandmas body o the street did it. It did answer your question though, didn't it? The original post mentioned a rapist running away, sorry that wasn't serious enough for you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vuduchile 1,940 Posted January 22, 2017 Everyone in NY benefited and continues to benefit from Guiliani's practices. Few will admit it. He completely turned the city around. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
trumpurethra 42 Posted January 22, 2017 Have you seen the real pics of Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin? Not the picture from when they were 12 either. They're focking huge compared to the guys they were assaulting. And we all know the beating doesn't stop once you're down. Then comes the kicking to the head and stomping. I'd love to see you getting the sh!t kicked out of you by one of these animals and you despite being armed, don't defend yourself with all that you have. Focking pacifist liberals are part of what's wrong with this country. Not a pacifist and been in plenty of fights. Never pulled a gun or a knife on someone. I have hit people with beer bottles and one with a pool cue. Whats wrong with the country is puzzys who can't fight pulling weapons. And yes, that includes some in uniform. JMTC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 5,172 Posted January 22, 2017 Not a pacifist and been in plenty of fights. Never pulled a gun or a knife on someone. I have hit people with beer bottles and one with a pool cue. Whats wrong with the country is puzzys who can't fight pulling weapons. And yes, that includes some in uniform. JMTC Congrats, you sound uber tough. Please explain the bolded, I don't understand it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
trumpurethra 42 Posted January 22, 2017 He completely turned the city around. Lived in Manhattan during Guiliani's early years. Some would argue he ruined NY. I myself really dug the East Village and Lower East Side before his gentrification. Then again I am a little bit street and not a chicken sh!t, pansy azz, right winger racist. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,593 Posted January 22, 2017 Lived in Manhattan during Guiliani's early years. Some would argue he ruined NY. I myself really dug the East Village and Lower East Side before his gentrification. Then again I am a little bit street and not a chicken sh!t, pansy azz, right winger racist. I wouldn't call going to NYU "living" on the LES Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
