Which trade option would you prefer and why

[Dawginator 0]

I've been offered two trade options for Tarvaris Jackson & Greg Jennings

 

Option #1 Chris Brown & Brian Calhoun for T. Jackson & G. Jennings

Option #2 Kevan Barlow & Brian Calhoun for T. Jackson & G. Jennings

 

Which option do you think is best or would you not take either one of them?

 

I play in a 12-team dynasty league (non-ppr) and I think I need to acquire some yound dynasty RB depth.

We start 1 QB, 2 RBs, 3 WRs, 1 TE and 1 FLEX position.

Here is my current roster:

 

Culpepper, Daunte MIA QB

Jackson, Tarvaris MIN QB

McNair, Steve BAL QB

Pennington, Chad NYJ QB

 

Gado, Samkon GBP RB

Johnson, Larry KCC RB

Jordan, Lamont OAK RB

Martin, Curtis NYJ RB

Moats, Ryan PHI RB

Suggs, Lee CLE RB

Williams, Ricky FA RB

 

Bradley, Mark CHI WR

Burleson, Nate SEA WR

Burress, Plaxico NYG WR

Ferguson, Robert GBP WR

Gabriel, Doug OAK WR

Jennings, Greg GBP WR

Moss, Santana WAS WR

Parker, Eric SDC WR

 

Anderson, Courtney OAK TE

Franks, Bubba GBP TE

Winslow, Kellen CLE TE

 

Wilkins, Jeff STL PK

Chiefs, Kansas City KCC Def

 

Thanks in advance for all replies

[FBH ** 0]

This trade should not change your team for this year at all, except giving you the option to use Brown or Barlow as necessary for bye week fill in. But the long term implications are the question. Calhoun could do well in Detroit, but KJ is there and he is still a young RB, so it may take a while to reap any rewards from that situation. But you would be giving up the future starter for the Vikings at QB, they are already making him the back-up, and a future starter at WR for the Pack. I don't think that you are getting enough in return if you are attempting to better your team long term, if you need the help for this season, it may be beneficial.

[Dawginator 0]

This trade should not change your team for this year at all, except giving you the option to use Brown or Barlow as necessary for bye week fill in. But the long term implications are the question. Calhoun could do well in Detroit, but KJ is there and he is still a young RB, so it may take a while to reap any rewards from that situation. But you would be giving up the future starter for the Vikings at QB, they are already making him the back-up, and a future starter at WR for the Pack. I don't think that you are getting enough in return if you are attempting to better your team long term, if you need the help for this season, it may be beneficial.

 

 

Thanks very much for your input...I edited my original post to include our starting lineup requirements. We have a FLEX position that can be either a RB, WR, or TE...our scoring system favors workhorse RBs.

 

Does this additional information change your analysis of these trade options?