Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Gepetto

Mark Zuckerberg censorship of Republican facebook page

Recommended Posts

This jew makes a good communist with his censorship and clamp down on free speech/the-first-amendment.

 

 

 

Report: Zuckerberg Shut Down Trump-Supporting Facebook Employee Group

 

http://www.breitbart...employee-group/

 

Facebook reportedly shut down an internal chat room which evolved into a forum for anonymous Facebook employees to discuss their support of President Donald Trump.

Business Insider reports that Facebook has shut down an anonymous online discussion group called “Facebook Anon” that was created in May of 2105 and was intended to be used by employees to anonymously express their concerns and opinions about the Facebook company. However, over the course of the 2016 election, this anonymous group reportedly became a hub for political discussion and comments, which reportedly alarmed Facebook management. By December of 2016, the anonymous group was shut down with Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg claiming that the group had been “spreading harassment.”

The anonymous group reportedly became a key place of discussion for right-leaning Facebook employees, perhaps because they felt that they could express their conservative views more openly in an anonymous forum. It was reported that a poster advertising the group on Facebook’s campus stated, “Trump Supporters Welcome,” a sentiment that is typically out of place in Silicon Valley. Many observers have drawn comparisons between Facebook’s shut down of one of the few conservative leaning groups for employees and the firing of former Google engineer James Damore who was let go from his position at Google for criticizing the company’s PC culture.

Facebook’s Head of People, Lori Goler, spoke to Business Insider saying, “Facebook’s mission is to give people the power to build community and bring the world closer together, and a cornerstone of our culture is being open. The FB Anon internal Facebook group violated our Terms of Service, which require people who use Facebook (including our employees) to use an authentic identity on our platform. Last year we disabled any anonymous internal groups or pages within Facebook, and reminded our people of the places at our company where they can have discussions about issues that matter to them, openly or confidentially as appropriate.”

“There was a feeling that everyone at the company was a Democrat or left-leaning,” an anonymous former employee told Business Insider, “I don’t think they really thought there would be too many people on the Trump side.” A month after the election of President Trump, the anonymous Facebook group was shut down. At a company meeting, Mark Zuckerberg was asked why the group had been shut down, replying that the group had been used by employees to harass people and this behavior would not be tolerated. Zuckerberg did not provide evidence of the harassment.

Shortly after the deletion of the group, more posters appeared on the Facebook campus featuring the beginning and end dates of the group with the tagline, “Silenced, but not silent.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How does that make him a good communist and how is this a first amendment issue?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Think of the communist Soviet Union from years ago. Now, think of Facebook as the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union under communist rule stifled free speech whenever necessary (e.g. burned books, controlled the media) to protect the interests of the Soviet Union. Zuckerberg, head of Facebook stopped the free anonymous facebook page where individuals could freely and anonymously state their opinions and discuss ideas and thoughts that were Republican or conservative. Zuckerberg is a liberal Democrat but this move to block this page is him being able to and actually completely blocking that community because it's against his political beliefs and goals for the United States.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How does that make him a good communist and how is this a first amendment issue?

If you have to ask you're not paying attention.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have to ask you're not paying attention.

 

I think he just wanted to generate discussion. He liked my original post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FB, Amazon, Youtube, Google, etc are waging jihad against conservatives more & more all the time. There are many stories of youtube demonitizing or canceling accounts outright in an attempt to control the narrative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

God, most of us can only hope this is the worst thing we have to say about our employer. It's like bitching that the couches are Lumpy and the free chair massages are too short.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have to ask you're not paying attention.

 

I think he was pointing out the poster was an idiot for bringing up the 1st Amendment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm ok with not having an anonymous internal political message board at a company.

 

Just look at this place and how people talk to each other.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

His company, his rules, he can do that. What he doesn't get to do is claim he and his product are not biased.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

His company, his rules, he can do that. What he doesn't get to do is claim he and his product are not biased.

has he done that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

yes on numerous occasions

 

he even created a logarithm to eliminate fake news

 

nothing from CNN and MSNBS has been eliminated to date

maybe that should tell you something?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

yes on numerous occasions

 

he even created a logarithm to eliminate fake news

 

nothing from CNN and MSNBS has been eliminated to date

:blink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FB, Amazon, Youtube, Google, etc are waging jihad against conservatives more & more all the time.

that's bullshit buddy. They are waging a Jihad against the fake made up bullshit stories that conservatives are constantly releasing. Like when someone dies and conservative websites come out with articles about how the Clintons had them killed. Those websites are like machines pumping out bulshit stories. And there are morons out there who believe everything they read. Our current president is a master at trying to get his sheep to think anything negative about him or his administration is fake. He has blurred the line between reality and fiction so badly that it now takes outsiders to keep or unintelligent public from being fooled.

Seth Rich anyone?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And why is his religion relevant?

If you have to ask why you're not paying attention

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gepetto is anti-semitic, and so are some others in the geek club?

 

No. Some of my very best friends are Jewish; I was even in one of their weddings. Actually, the reason I mention that Zuckerberg is a jew is because I was originally going to call him a Nazi instead of a Communist, and thought that would be some nice irony. Also, rich Jews control the media and want to control our country and the world.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

No. Some of my very best friends are Jewish; I was even in one of their weddings. Actually, the reason I mention that Zuckerberg is a jew is because I was originally going to call him a Nazi instead of a Communist, and thought that would be some nice irony. Also, rich Jews control the media and want to control our country and the world.

Funny how you edited the Nazi part, but stuck with unnecessarily labeling him based on religion.

 

Also interesting that you think your last sentence is anything but antisemitic. Or do you hold people you perceive wanting to control everything in high esteem?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny how you edited the Nazi part, but stuck with unnecessarily labeling him based on religion.

 

Also interesting that you think your last sentence is anything but antisemitic. Or do you hold people you perceive wanting to control everything in high esteem?

 

It's completely relevant that he's Jewish and controlling at a high level a left leaning political control. I said it so people like you can learn, so good that you asked. Also, fock off with you're calling me antisemitic. Last sentence is not antisemitic, it's the truth. Fock you're annoying, just like the rest of the lefties calling bad names to people.

 

As far as rich Jews controlling the media, start looking up companies in Wikipedia, check the ownership of each. I've done that already.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny how you edited the Nazi part, but stuck with unnecessarily labeling him based on religion.

 

Also interesting that you think your last sentence is anything but antisemitic. Or do you hold people you perceive wanting to control everything in high esteem?

They do control the media. To say otherwise is a complete lie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They do control the media. To say otherwise is a complete lie.

how are they able to do that? Are they just smarter and more talented/creative then all the other less developed races?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's completely relevant that he's Jewish and controlling at a high level a left leaning political control. I said it so people like you can learn, so good that you asked. Also, fock off with you're calling me antisemitic. Last sentence is not antisemitic, it's the truth. Fock you're annoying, just like the rest of the lefties calling bad names to people.

 

As far as rich Jews controlling the media, start looking up companies in Wikipedia, check the ownership of each. I've done that already.

You're out of your antisemitic mind. The big bad Jews aren't controlling anything.

 

Since you're so fond of Wikipedia, read the entry on antisemitic canard: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitic_canard

One well-known antisemitic cliché is that "the Jews control the media".[69][70] Historically, it has been traced to discredited early 20th-century publications such as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (1903) and to Henry Ford's Dearborn Independent.

 

J. J. Goldberg, Editorial Director of the newspaper The Forward, in 1997 published a study of this myth regarding the United States,[71] concluding that, although Jews do hold many prominent positions in the U.S. media industry, they "do not make a high priority of Jewish concerns" and that Jewish Americans generally perceive the media as anti-Israel.[72] Variants on this theme have focused on Hollywood, the press,[73][74][75][76] and the music industry.[77][78][79][80][81]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how are they able to do that? Are they just smarter and more talented/creative then all the other less developed races?

One thing I've never understood about antisemitism - the stereotypes of frugality, resourcefulness and industriousness aren't bad, yet Jews have had more than their share of contempt. Can't figure out if it's jealousy, or rooted in the perception that the Jews contributed directly to Jesus' death.

 

Outside of this bored, I haven't heard the nonsense spewed by these nitwits in years, but it's readily apparent antisemitism is alive and well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×