drobeski 3,061 Posted June 20, 2017 Does the Obama administration refusing to hand over and hiding the documents relating to unmasking of American citizens = obstruction? Or just another typical move by the sleaziest most corrupt administration in history ? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crackattack 513 Posted June 20, 2017 You're not allowed to bring up past presidents or past heads of the doj or past sos appointees. It's almost like they're adjudicated of all wrong/perceived wrong doings the moment they leave office. Not even allowed to question it or want it looked at hth. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 824 Posted June 20, 2017 You're not allowed to bring up past presidents or past heads of the doj or past sos appointees. It's almost like they're adjudicated of all wrong/perceived wrong doings the moment they leave office. Not even allowed to question it or want it looked at hth. Says who? If you break the law you break the law. We should look into Bush for those war crimes IMO. I don't know much about it, but I recall Lefty's being as outraged about those as the Righty's are at Obama now. So lets investigate Bush and see where it goes. This is important. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 20, 2017 Does the Obama administration refusing to hand over and hiding the documents relating to unmasking of American citizens = obstruction? Or just another typical move by the sleaziest most corrupt administration in history ? Someone has been reading Pundit again? Refusing to hand over to who? Judicial Watch? Sure. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crackattack 513 Posted June 20, 2017 Says who? If you break the law you break the law. We should look into Bush for those war crimes IMO. I don't know much about it, but I recall Lefty's being as outraged about those as the Righty's are at Obama now. So lets investigate Bush and see where it goes. This is important. I don't know that he did commit war crimes, but if so, yes. My anger with the Bush administration came with the lies they sold leading to an unnecessary war in Iraq. Which in turn caused hundreds of thousands of unnecessary deaths. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Guy 1,400 Posted June 20, 2017 Does the Obama administration refusing to hand over and hiding the documents relating to unmasking of American citizens = obstruction? Or just another typical move by the sleaziest most corrupt administration in history ? both Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,380 Posted June 20, 2017 Someone has been reading Pundit again? Refusing to hand over to who? Judicial Watch? Sure. A liar and not informed. You're the perfect liberal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 20, 2017 A liar and not informed. You're the perfect liberal. Yeah...so not informed that I knew exactly what and where the OP came from. Liar? Back that up just once...again, everyone knows you can't and won't. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 21, 2017 Susan Rice's name again. Yeah, nothing unusual with their unmasking requests even with no foreign officials in the conversations. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joneo 529 Posted June 21, 2017 Yeah...so not informed that I knew exactly what and where the OP came from. Liar? Back that up just once...again, everyone knows you can't and won't. I don't consider you a liar as that constitutes intent. You're just an abhorrent left wing sheep that displays ignorance as fact. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 21, 2017 I don't consider you a liar as that constitutes intent. You're just an abhorrent left wing sheep that displays ignorance as fact. Then you would be able to prove me wrong. Only problem is...Im dead on correct on this one...you all have nothing. So best you can do is claim others are lying or ignorant. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joneo 529 Posted June 21, 2017 Then you would be able to prove me wrong. Only problem is...Im dead on correct on this one...you all have nothing. So best you can do is claim others are lying or ignorant. I forgot to mention how delusional you are. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 21, 2017 The special counsel is now looking into obstruction of the Obama Administration for the Clinton email scandal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,485 Posted June 21, 2017 They are a new kind of stupid. They are not logical. They make no sense whatsoever. But they are going to have the media on their side, and that's the danger. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joneo 529 Posted June 21, 2017 The special counsel is now looking into obstruction of the Obama Administration for the Clinton email scandal. But but but.... Obama isn't President. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 21, 2017 I forgot to mention how delusional you are. So...no...can't prove the claims you are making about me. Thanks...just as I thought. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 21, 2017 The special counsel is now looking into obstruction of the Obama Administration for the Clinton email scandal. Have at it... And link? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 21, 2017 http://nypost.com/2017/06/20/next-up-a-special-counsel-to-probe-team-obamas-obstruction-of-justice/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 21, 2017 http://nypost.com/2017/06/20/next-up-a-special-counsel-to-probe-team-obamas-obstruction-of-justice/ So nothing stating the special counsel is investigating...just that Senate Judiciary committee members are calling for Grassley to look into it and have Lynch testify. You should try reading more than headlines. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
giraldi02 470 Posted June 21, 2017 http://nypost.com/2017/06/20/next-up-a-special-counsel-to-probe-team-obamas-obstruction-of-justice/ Paul Sperry also made the claim that Obama had an army of 30,000 protestors that he would command from a bunker. http://nypost.com/2017/02/11/how-obama-is-scheming-to-sabotage-trumps-presidency/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 21, 2017 Paul Sperry also made the claim that Obama had an army of 30,000 protestors that he would command from a bunker. http://nypost.com/2017/02/11/how-obama-is-scheming-to-sabotage-trumps-presidency/ Are those the ones that are peacefully burning down cities and looting? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 21, 2017 Paul Sperry also made the claim that Obama had an army of 30,000 protestors that he would command from a bunker. http://nypost.com/2017/02/11/how-obama-is-scheming-to-sabotage-trumps-presidency/ Deep state running out of anon existent basement of a pizza place Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 21, 2017 Deep state running out of anon existent basement of a pizza place Russians hacked them and are controlling them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 540 Posted June 21, 2017 They are a new kind of stupid. They are not logical. They make no sense whatsoever. But they are going to have the media on their side, and that's the danger. You should copy & paste a list about it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,642 Posted June 21, 2017 Someone is Definetly obstructing the investigation into Seth Richs murder. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 540 Posted June 21, 2017 Someone is Definetly obstructing the investigation into Seth Richs murder. And Benghazi. And Hillary's emails. Bwahahahahaha Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,485 Posted June 21, 2017 In the wake of their stunning defeat the Lefties are defending Islamic Terror illegals Chinese steel Chicago murderers Hollywood snowflakes the unaffordable care act transgender bathrooms Chemical Warfare Tampon Machines in the Men's Bathrooms tax and spend failed Socialist Governments rioting to prevent free speech a Nuclear Iran America Last punishing success rewarding apathy Nuclear Korea James Comey The Swamp the murder of Seth Rich transferring obscene material to minors MMGW Hypocrisy Politically Correct Nonsense Hillary Clinton Kathy Griffin DUI Globalization Paris Accord Growing the Chinese economy at the expense of the American economy Fake News Partial birth abortion Perjury Assassination Rape Racism Foreign Governments brutalization of American Citizens Human Rights atrocities in Cuba Obstruction of Justice Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 21, 2017 In the wake of their stunning defeat the Lefties are defending Islamic Terror illegals Chinese steel Chicago murderers Hollywood snowflakes the unaffordable care act transgender bathrooms Chemical Warfare Tampon Machines in the Men's Bathrooms tax and spend failed Socialist Governments rioting to prevent free speech a Nuclear Iran America Last punishing success rewarding apathy Nuclear Korea James Comey The Swamp the murder of Seth Rich transferring obscene material to minors MMGW Hypocrisy Politically Correct Nonsense Hillary Clinton Kathy Griffin DUI Globalization Paris Accord Growing the Chinese economy at the expense of the American economy Fake News Partial birth abortion Perjury Assassination Rape Racism Foreign Governments brutalization of American Citizens Human Rights atrocities in Cuba Obstruction of Justice Liar Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joneo 529 Posted June 21, 2017 So...no...can't prove the claims you are making about me. Thanks...just as I thought. Prove What? That you're a delusional sheep. I don't need to. You do a good enough job on your own. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 824 Posted June 21, 2017 In the wake of their stunning defeat the Lefties are defending Islamic Terror illegals Chinese steel Chicago murderers Hollywood snowflakes the unaffordable care act transgender bathrooms Chemical Warfare Tampon Machines in the Men's Bathrooms tax and spend failed Socialist Governments rioting to prevent free speech a Nuclear Iran America Last punishing success rewarding apathy Nuclear Korea James Comey The Swamp the murder of Seth Rich transferring obscene material to minors MMGW Hypocrisy Politically Correct Nonsense Hillary Clinton Kathy Griffin DUI Globalization Paris Accord Growing the Chinese economy at the expense of the American economy Fake News Partial birth abortion Perjury Assassination Rape Racism Foreign Governments brutalization of American Citizens Human Rights atrocities in Cuba Obstruction of Justice Some of that, yes of course, depending on how you mean it in each instance. Do you mean defending the word, the issue behind, the looking into as an issue, or what? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 21, 2017 So the email from Loretta Lynch to Wasserman Schultz assuring the FBI email investigation "wouldn't go too far" was labeled by the FBI as possibly fake and planted by Russians. However, Comey decided to act upon it then shutdown the investigation despite some of his agents wanting to proceed. Doesn't make sense, does it? Perhaps he knew the document was real and was providing cover for Clinton as well as himself. By labelling it fake he also gave Lynch cover as well. When questioned about the email, he stated something about classified info or investigation. Certainly makes sense with the Tarmac meeting and telling Comey to call the investigation a matter. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,485 Posted June 21, 2017 Some of that, yes of course, depending on how you mean it in each instance. Do you mean defending the word, the issue behind, the looking into as an issue, or what? Everyone of these issues was either defended or made light of by board Lefties. This list has been placed in all the appropriate threads when it happens and the list continues to grow. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,485 Posted June 21, 2017 The Left is upset because these emails tore the mask off of Hillary's bogus campaign and exposed a platform of hatred and deceit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 21, 2017 Prove What? That you're a delusional sheep. I don't need to. You do a good enough job on your own. I don't consider you a liar as that constitutes intent. You're just an abhorrent left wing sheep that displays ignorance as fact. Your words...that have zero basis in fact. Run along now junior. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 21, 2017 So the email from Loretta Lynch to Wasserman Schultz assuring the FBI email investigation "wouldn't go too far" was labeled by the FBI as possibly fake and planted by Russians. However, Comey decided to act upon it then shutdown the investigation despite some of his agents wanting to proceed. Doesn't make sense, does it? Perhaps he knew the document was real and was providing cover for Clinton as well as himself. By labelling it fake he also gave Lynch cover as well. When questioned about the email, he stated something about classified info or investigation. Certainly makes sense with the Tarmac meeting and telling Comey to call the investigation a matter. Makes a lot of sense that Comey felt things would get muddied by propaganda and public opinion based on that propaganda. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 21, 2017 Everyone of these issues was either defended or made light of by board Lefties. This list has been placed in all the appropriate threads when it happens and the list continues to grow. You're a liar. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,584 Posted June 21, 2017 Everyone of these issues was either defended or made light of by board Lefties. This list has been placed in all the appropriate threads when it happens and the list continues to grow. you forgot grammar and spelling police http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=466449&page=3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joneo 529 Posted June 21, 2017 I don't consider you a liar as that constitutes intent. You're just an abhorrent left wing sheep that displays ignorance as fact. Your words...that have zero basis in fact. Run along now junior. Oh yeah, I forgot about your being an egotistical narcissist and always having the last word. You consider the last word as winning. Loser Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745 Posted June 21, 2017 The special counsel is now looking into obstruction of the Obama Administration for the Clinton email scandal. Good. As I've said repeatedly, investigate em all. The only thing that would make me happier than trump and pence getting impeached in disgrace would be for that to happen AND half the DNC go to prison. Because both parties are slime. Fock em both. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites