Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
edjr

Aren't we overdue for a mass shooting?

Recommended Posts

Authorities said one woman has died and 13 others are injured, after a mass shooting incident in downtown Toronto on July 22. The suspected gunman was killed in an exchange of gunfire with police. (Ambe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Authorities said one woman has died and 13 others are injured, after a mass shooting incident in downtown Toronto on July 22. The suspected gunman was killed in an exchange of gunfire with police. (Ambe

 

Nailed it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, here's the part of the story that didn't get told. You know how the woman died? Yeah that would be an errant cop bullet. What do they find these Goobers? For fucksake. How many times do we see a shooting where there's like 47 rounds and the guy gets hit in the arm twice.?

 

Really? Maybe that's what happens when you show up with 900 cops against one guy in a Trader Joes.

 

Now, I'm not suggesting that they call in Marion cobretti or anything like that. But how about they play a little game like:

 

"okay! Only people born in June get to shoot this time! And only 3 bullets each! Ready go!"

 

 

Jesus, every time you get these cops involved they're either hiding 3 blocks away or forming a perimeter two blocks away or when they do start shooting it's like a zemeckis film.

 

Can't wait to get the final count. "Officers expended 942 shots. Reloading an average of 4.2 times per officer. Unfortunately, The shooter died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound. Each officer will get partial credit and a months paid vacation to deal with the trauma of their experience."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There ya go. Who brings joystick to a gunfight?

 

Another loner, loser goes nuts when things don't go his way. This is what happens when you pussify America. I guess you should have given him a trophy when he walked into the competition. I'll bet that if you polled these guys that play in these tourneys, 'who is the most likely to go on a mass shooting', this guy would have won hands down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How much mass do you need for a mass shooting?

Is the mass dependent on deaths or wounded?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not according to USA Today

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/columnist/nancy-armour/2018/08/27/jacksonville-shooting-has-e-gamers-questioning-u-s-gun-laws/1113990002/

 

Here's a gem from the USA Today too.

 

USA TODAY NETWORK Principles of Ethical Conduct For Newsrooms

 

USA TODAY Network’s Principles of Ethical Conduct for Newsrooms includes concepts and language developed by the Radio and Television Digital News Association, other Gannett documents and a group of Gannett executives and journalists. These principles are designed to guide journalists working with any news platform, including newspapers, websites, mobile devices, video, social media channels and live story events.

 

WE ARE COMMITTED TO:

 

I. Seeking and reporting the truth in a truthful way

 

We will be honest in the way we gather, report and present news - with relevancy, persistence, context, thoroughness, balance, and fairness in mind.

We will seek to gain understanding of the communities, individuals and issues we cover to provide an informed account of activities.

We will hold factual information in editorials and other opinion pieces to the same standards of accuracy as news stories.

We will treat information from unofficial sources, which may include social media, with skepticism and will seek to corroborate information.

When considering news content created outside of the Network, we will factor the credibility of the source and weigh the value and accuracy of information provided.

 

II. Serving the public interest

 

We will uphold First Amendment principles to serve the democratic process.

We will be vigilant watchdogs of government and institutions that affect the public, fighting to ensure that the public’s business is conducted in public.

We will seek solutions as well as expose problems and wrongdoing in order to effect change for the good in the communities we serve.

We will provide public forums for diverse people and views.

We will reflect and encourage understanding of the diverse segments of our community.

We will provide editorial and community leadership.

We will seek to promote understanding of complex issues.

When sharing editorials and other opinion articles, we will encourage and promote views that foster understanding, insight and civil discourse. We seek to offer viewpoints that represent various views on a particular topic.

We will consider providing free access to some news coverage during public safety emergencies and as a public service when appropriate, such as elections.

 

III. Exercising fair play

 

We will treat people with respect and compassion.

We will correct errors promptly.

We will strive to include all sides relevant to a story. When news develops and we can’t include important perspectives immediately, we will share updates, including additional sources, when possible. We also will share attempts to reach sources who add value to the story.

We will explain to audiences our journalistic processes to promote transparency and engagement.

We will give particular attention to fairness in relations with people unaccustomed to dealing with the news media.

We will use confidential sources as the sole basis for published information only as a last resort and under specific procedures that best serve the public’s right to know.

 

IV. Maintaining independence

 

We will remain free of outside interests, investments or business relationships that may compromise the credibility of our news reporting.

We will maintain an impartial, arm’s-length relationship with anyone seeking to influence the news.

We will not support political campaigns or causes through the display of bumper stickers, signs, pins, public/private donations, participation in demonstrations, petitions or in social media posts.

Individual viewpoints that might cause readers to question our impartiality in news coverage should remain private. This principle does not apply to those who are paid to write and share opinion.

We will avoid potential conflicts of interest and eliminate inappropriate influence on content.

We will be free of improper obligations to news sources, newsmakers and advertisers.

We will not blur the line between advertising and editorial content. We will provide appropriate disclosures, exercise transparency and avoid actual or implicit commercial endorsements by our journalists.

When sponsorships of news are appropriate, we will not allow them to determine, change or restrict content.

 

V. Acting with integrity

 

We will act honorably and ethically in dealing with news sources, the public and our colleagues.

We will obey the law.

We will observe standards of decency.

We will take responsibility for our decisions and consider the possible consequences of our actions.

We will be conscientious in observing these principles.

We will use technological tools with skill and thoughtfulness, avoiding approaches that skew facts, distort reality, or sensationalize events.

We will not plagiarize or fabricate information.

We will not alter photos, video or audio to misrepresent events or mislead audiences.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×