Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Mike Honcho

Whitehouse Turnover - 34% First year

Recommended Posts

 

NPR

 

Turnover in Trump's first year was more than triple that in former President Barack Obama's first year, and double the rate in President Ronald Reagan's White House. A full 34 percent of high-level White House aides either resigned, were fired or moved into different positions in this first year of the Trump presidency.

 

 

 

You don't see that kind of turnover at a Denny's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But but but but everybody wants to work there! President Trump just told us that yesterday! And he wouldn't lie to us would he?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The economy is rocking, the market is flying high. President looking out for the USA. You keep the losers focused on that going no where witch hunt with the Russians and Mueller.

 

Man, this is the way to run a presidency.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You might want to check that whole flying high Market thing. Meanwhile, while the market was dropping like a stone, Trump tweeted out of book review today for the producer of The Apprentice. No kidding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You might want to check that whole flying high Market thing. Meanwhile, while the market was dropping like a stone, Trump tweeted out of book review today for the producer of The Apprentice. No kidding.

 

Can you let us know how much the market is up since he's been elected? I'll hang up and listen..........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

You don't see that kind of turnover at a Denny's.

Better management at a Dennys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You might want to check that whole flying high Market thing. Meanwhile, while the market was dropping like a stone, Trump tweeted out of book review today for the producer of The Apprentice. No kidding.

You are going to be very disappointed when the market rallies later in the day. Odds are it sells in the morning and creeps upward during the day. It's a buying opportunity 1st thing this morning. A complete gift from Pres. Trump.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you fill a cabinet with real working people, they tend to want to get back to their day jobs after they have MAGA. :thumbsup:

 

And there appears to be no shortage of qualified replacements. :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Can you let us know how much the market is up since he's been elected? I'll hang up and listen..........

Correlation/causation.

 

Top of my head, the market damn near what , tripled? Under Obama?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you fill a cabinet with real working people, they tend to want to get back to their day jobs after they have MAGA. :thumbsup:

 

 

Celebrity Big Brother? 😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you fill a cabinet with real working people, they tend to want to get back to their day jobs after they have MAGA. :thumbsup:

 

 

Speaking of which, where are Spicer, manafort, Flynn, scaramucci working these days? I know icahns lining up a pretty good job of having insider trading charges filed against him any minute now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

And there appears to be no shortage of qualified replacements. :thumbsup:

As of the last reporting, there were more than 250 unfilled positions in the Trump Administration alone. That doesn't count the greater federal government areas such as crucial State Department positions, you know, like the crucial need to have a South Korean ambassador. Nor does it count crucial unfilled positions in intelligence or law enforcement agencies.

 

Of those 250 unfilled positions, Trump doesn't even have nominees lined up. So it's not like he can blame the confirmation process.

 

Man, 250 jobs open? Maybe he should contact monster.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The economy is rocking, the market is flying high. President looking out for the USA. You keep the losers focused on that going no where witch hunt with the Russians and Mueller.

 

Man, this is the way to run a presidency.

 

 

Trump's golf course orders presidential seal tee markers. Is that legal?

 

Federal law spells out that manufacturing or using the presidential seal for commercial use — unless authorized under regulations ordered by the president and published in the Federal Register — can be punishable with up to six months in prison, a fine or both.

6 people who have accused Donald Trump of cheating at golf

The “law is an expression of the idea that the government and government authority should not be used for private purpose,” Kathleen Clark, a law professor at Washington University, told ProPublica. “It would be a misuse of government authority.”

Bates said that there is nothing that specifically notes Donald Trump on the markers themselves.

According to the U.S. Code, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 33, Section 713:

"Whoever, except as authorized under regulations promulgated by the President and published in the Federal Register, knowingly manufactures, reproduces, sells, or purchases for resale, either separately or appended to any article manufactured or sold, any likeness of the seals of the President or Vice President, or any substantial part thereof, except for manufacture or sale of the article for the official use of the Government of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both."

 

 

Yes, they are running this presidency with all class.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Yes, they are running this presidency with all class.

And, among other things, Kelly Ann cadaver was just nailed for violating the Hatch Act at least twice regarding ivanka's line of products.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Correlation/causation.

 

Top of my head, the market damn near what , tripled? Under Obama?

 

Perhaps, the righty's should wait until this administration's policies and budgets go into effect before pointing to the markets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They also sell naked lady tees in the pro shop that look a lot like Stormy Daniels.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you fill a cabinet with real working people, they tend to want to get back to their day jobs after they have MAGA. :thumbsup:

 

And there appears to be no shortage of qualified replacements. :thumbsup:

Much of his cabinet werent qualified to begin with.

You call me a bot...yet give the bot type FoxNew answer. Classic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm trying to figure out why we should care. Cool story though, figured it was higher.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm trying to figure out why we should care. Cool story though, figured it was higher.

 

It's better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It's better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.

 

OK , I get that you need to make a funny at my expense and I'm good with that but, seriously, why should we care?

 

:dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm trying to figure out why we should care. Cool story though, figured it was higher.

The Perfect Analogy to this is when Governor Bush was named Secretary of Energy and he vowed to eliminate the whole department.

 

Then he found out in his first week that they were responsible among other things for nuclear security.

 

Trump is the same way writ large.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

OK , I get that you need to make a funny at my expense and I'm good with that but, seriously, why should we care?

 

:dunno:

This is what I'm talking about. Hopefully you were just trolling. But I fear you're not.

 

We are teetering on the brink of armed conflict

 

In the Korean penninsula and yet we don't even have an ambassador to South Korea.

 

When we have a dottering dotard firing off tweets at o'dark 30 because he misses Hope Hicks, it's kind of crucial to have somebody in the region to be the grown-up and smooth our message out.

 

You know, just for example.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what I'm talking about. Hopefully you were just trolling. But I fear you're not.

 

We are teetering on the brink of armed conflict

 

In the Korean penninsula and yet we don't even have an ambassador to South Korea.

 

When we have a dottering dotard firing off tweets at o'dark 30 because he misses Hope Hicks, it's kind of crucial to have somebody in the region to be the grown-up and smooth our message out.

 

You know, just for example.

 

I'm confident those issues can be addressed regardless of White House admin turnover rates.

 

HTH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I'm confident those issues can be addressed regardless of White House admin turnover rates.

 

HTH

Well, as long as you're confident that's all that matters.

 

You should look into the reason why Saddam thought he could skate right into Kuwait without any repercussions from the United States. It's an interesting read.

 

I've said before, there is going to be a serious ratification. And it's going to be trscked back to the fact that we don't have 40% of our Justice or homesec or defense or state or whatever positions filled.

 

Then and only then will you start to get something like this. But then will come the usual finger pointing and distractions to keep you from seeing the truth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a lot of us have been through something like this in the corporate world.

 

There are certainly organizations, the federal government to be sure, that have scads of Deadwood in the system. No one would argue otherwise.

 

And, if there was a team that was looking at job descriptions and responsibilities for every single position and or taking a look at recommendations from department heads themselves or something even remotely close to that, most of us would feel a little bit better.

 

But just flat out not filling 30, 40, 50 per-cent of positions and waiting to see what fails as a result?

 

That's a recipe for disaster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

OK , I get that you need to make a funny at my expense and I'm good with that but, seriously, why should we care?

 

:dunno:

 

Why should we care that there is double the turnover in the White House than at this time in any presidency?

 

Yeah...I wonder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a lot of us have been through something like this in the corporate world.

 

There are certainly organizations, the federal government to be sure, that have scads of Deadwood in the system. No one would argue otherwise.

 

And, if there was a team that was looking at job descriptions and responsibilities for every single position and or taking a look at recommendations from department heads themselves or something even remotely close to that, most of us would feel a little bit better.

 

But just flat out not filling 30, 40, 50 per-cent of positions and waiting to see what fails as a result?

 

That's a recipe for disaster.

 

While the positions that are filled keep turning over...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats it, I'm not voting for him again. This is outrageous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats it, I'm not voting for him again. This is outrageous.

:lol:

 

You must be a professor at that community college joke telling class you were telling me about...my sides hurt.

 

:lol: :LOL: :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a lot of us have been through something like this in the corporate world.

 

There are certainly organizations, the federal government to be sure, that have scads of Deadwood in the system. No one would argue otherwise.

 

And, if there was a team that was looking at job descriptions and responsibilities for every single position and or taking a look at recommendations from department heads themselves or something even remotely close to that, most of us would feel a little bit better.

 

But just flat out not filling 30, 40, 50 per-cent of positions and waiting to see what fails as a result?

 

That's a recipe for disaster.

A disaster for Democrats.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, as long as you're confident that's all that matters.

 

:thumbsup:

 

Not interested in the rest of your ramblings, invented numbers, and hypothetical scenarios.

 

HTH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

:thumbsup:

 

Not interested in the rest of your ramblings, invented numbers, and hypothetical scenarios.

 

HTH

A page from the playbook of screaming Fake News! 😭😠

 

Got it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×