Yeah, we have been over this. You guys continue to minimize the head-to-head format versus group tournaments in individual sports. Golf is a little bit harder to win on a per tournament basis, but that doesn't vault Tiger over Fed's level of sustained dominance.
What would a tennis player need to accomplish for you to consider them better than Tiger? What would Federer have to do?
In a single year or few year stretch? Probably couldnt do much. That is just how I view each sport.
Fed with 20 slams never won 4 in a row like Tiger did in a much tougher format with less career majors. Hell just in the last 8 years 2 other players have won 3 in a row. Djokovic won 4 in a row. Seems rather typical.