Bad day for FBI/DOJ scumbags.

[Sho Nuff 719]

That is why they are complaining about an immigration policy that has been around for decades.

 

Why didnt Obama change this policy when he had a super majority? He could have created open borders.

Because the zero tolerance thing that has led to separation of children from families is not old policy.

Yet you all keep repeating that lie.

In addition it was being discussed before the IG report that was a dud even came out.

As usual, you dont let facts get on the way of your little rants.

[SenatorRock 708]

As are you...as usual, you spin all of it and leave out key parts. Typical of the troll yiubare.

It is always obvious who actually watches a speech and who merely gets their talking points from CNN and communistguys.com.

 

We also learned from Wray that Comey is under criminal investigation.

 

BOOM.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,493]

It is always obvious who actually watches a speech and who merely gets their talking points from CNN and communistguys.com.

 

We also learned from Wray that Comey is under criminal investigation.

 

BOOM.

 

Y'know he watches Maddow or the Young Turks for 3-5 minutes to pump up the hate then rushes over here to post.

[Sho Nuff 719]

It is always obvious who actually watches a speech and who merely gets their talking points from CNN and communistguys.com.

 

We also learned from Wray that Comey is under criminal investigation.

 

BOOM.

You whine about talking points...yet only post right wing garbage.

Its laughable troll.

[Mr. Hand 482]

You whine about talking points...yet only post right wing garbage.

Its laughable troll.

You are a seriously messed up dude.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,589]

It is always obvious who actually watches a speech and who merely gets their talking points from CNN and communistguys.com.

 

We also learned from Wray that Comey is under criminal investigation.

 

BOOM.

Same crew that claim nothing came out of the Benghazi investigation. Nothing but the fact that Hillary had her own private server in some closet. Cost her the election. If these hearings have half the impact as the Benghazi one did we're in for a good time. Lol.

[ROCKFORD 134]

for the casual reader here ...

 

cliff notes?

[lickin_starfish 1,477]

for the casual reader here ...

 

cliff notes?

Obama's FBI/DOJ let Hillary off the hook, and are under the microscope for it.

[ROCKFORD 134]

Obama's FBI/DOJ let Hillary off the hook, and are under the microscope for it.

 

thanks, pm me when its all figured out. tia.

[Baker Boy 1,478]

Because the zero tolerance thing that has led to separation of children from families is not old policy.

Yet you all keep repeating that lie.

In addition it was being discussed before the IG report that was a dud even came out.

As usual, you dont let facts get on the way of your little rants.

The policy is old and Obama expanded the separation of families in 2014.

 

Please tell where you think our current immigration policy comes from. Did Trump pass a new one or is he just upholding the law like he promised in his oath of office?

 

You truly are a perfect example of a meathead!

[Sho Nuff 719]

The policy is old and Obama expanded the separation of families in 2014.

 

Please tell where you think our current immigration policy comes from. Did Trump pass a new one or is he just upholding the law like he promised in his oath of office?

 

You truly are a perfect example of a meathead!

You are lying again.

There zero tolerance is all Trump...the increase in separation is all Trump.

Be better baker...step away from Fox for a bit.

[Baker Boy 1,478]

You are lying again.

There zero tolerance is all Trump...the increase in separation is all Trump.

Be better baker...step away from Fox for a bit.

So Trump is enforcing the law and you think that is wrong. There is no tolerance level built into our immigration policy. What kind of moron passes a law and doesnt enforce it? This is not a traffic stop it is national security.

 

Here is my link where is yours?

 

Years of backlash: Obama policy on illegal immigrants' children was also slammed by critics

 

The Obama administration actually expanded the system of detaining families typically mothers and their minor children after a huge surge of Central Americans along the U.S.-Mexican border in 2014.

 

Videos and photos at the time showed children in tears, many of them still wearing dirty clothes, in detention facilities where they were kept with their families. The conditions -- which ranged from six adults and children sleeping crammed on two mattresses laid out on concrete floors, to sick minors not receiving medical care -- were documented in many news accounts and reports by human rights groups.

 

At the time, Obama administration officials argued they had no choice but to implement policies intended to deter families from entering the U.S. illegally. Trump administration officials have made similar arguments

http://www.foxnews.c...by-critics.html

[Sho Nuff 719]

Its all been posted in the other thread...yet here you are again.

Run along phurfur

[drobeski 3,061]

Because the zero tolerance thing that has led to separation of children from families is not old policy.

Yet you all keep repeating that lie.

In addition it was being discussed before the IG report that was a dud even came out.

As usual, you dont let facts get on the way of your little rants.

children are forcefully removed from their parents every day in this country, stop pretending you care.

You, wiff the democrats and cbfalcons of the world are despicable piles or horse schit, off and shove your phoney fake outrage right up your scumbag fake to the core asses.

Pure dirtbags

[Sho Nuff 719]

children are forcefully removed from their parents every day in this country, stop pretending you care.

You, wiff the democrats and cbfalcons of the world are despicable piles or horse schit, ###### off and shove your phoney fake outrage right up your scumbag fake to the core asses.

Pure dirtbags

 

Ignorance and tilting all in one post...typical drobeski.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,589]

Remember when Hillary was criticized because she represented a child rapist and got him off? The lefts justification was that everyone deserves to be treated fairly under the law. The don't seem to feel that way about the FBI and DOJ going after Trump, which this IG's report shows they did. They treated the Hillary investigation one way, and treat/treated the Trump one another. They are FOS as usual.

[SenatorRock 708]

Now the timing on the fake migrant hysteria (aka think of the children!!!!!!!!!) makes sense.

 

Last week the IG report dropped, laying out dozens of examples of corruption and bias from the FBI in the handling of the MYE.

 

Today Horowitz and Wray testified before the Senate, stating on the record that the FBI displayed bias, stated on the record that Comey is under criminal investigation, and that there are classified communications between Loretta Lynch and an unnamed party with regard to the Tarmac Meeting.

 

Strzok stated that he is willing to go on the record with no immunity.

 

 

Nunes is on the trail of one of the crooks: https://twitter.com/devinnunes/status/1008921517986537472?s=21

 

Anything to distract the useful idiots from what is happening in the real world. Fake hysteria is short lived though. Criminal prosecutions are permanent.

[Sho Nuff 719]

Nunes is the crook dumbass troll.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

There zero tolerance is all Trump.

 

Are you talking immigration or the FBI/DOJ's farce of an investigation of Trump Campaign for contacts that THEY engineered while blowing off a multitude of crimes by Hillary?

[Mr. Hand 482]

Yep, no bias at all!

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/19/ig-confirms-is-reviewing-whether-strzoks-anti-trump-bias-impacted-launch-russia-probe.html

 

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz confirmed Tuesday that he is investigating whether FBI official Peter Strzok’s anti-Trump bias factored into the launch of the bureau’s Russia probe.

During a joint hearing before the House Oversight and Judiciary committees, Horowitz testified that his office was reviewing Strzok’s anti-Trump text messages as part of a separate probe related to the Russia investigation.

“It clearly shows a biased state of mind,” Horowitz said, referring to text messages written as the FBI probe of Hillary Clinton's private email use was wrapping up and the Russia probe was getting underway.

The most infamous text, revealed in last week's IG report on the Clinton email case, showed Strzok responding "We'll stop it" when his colleague and lover Lisa Page sought assurances that Trump would not become president.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., questioned Horowitz on whether that apparent bias influenced the initiation of the investigation into Russia interference in the 2016 campaign and potential collusion with Trump's team.

“That’s a matter we’ve got under review and are looking at right now,” Horowitz said.

It was revealed earlier this year that Horowitz’s office was investigating allegations of government surveillance abuse tied to the start of the Russia probe. But Horowitz’s testimony, meant to answer questions about the conclusion of the Clinton case review, revealed some of the specifics involved in the ongoing Russia case review, including the Strzok texts.

Goodlatte pressed Horowitz over the politically charged text messages -- which the report described as “hostile” -- and noted how several were sent near the start of the Russia probe.

“Correct,” Horowitz said. “In fact, there were these other text messages in roughly the same time period.”

The exchange came minutes after House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., also outlined the curious timing of a string of texts between Strzok and Page, just as the Russia probe, which Strzok was involved in, was beginning.

Gowdy laid out a timeline—beginning July 5, 2016 when Comey recommended no criminal charges against Clinton, to July 28, 2016, when the FBI initiated a counterintelligence investigation into the Russia issue.

“Three weeks after Clinton is exonerated by Comey, Strzok is leading the investigation into Russia and coordination with the Trump campaign,” Gowdy said Tuesday.

“And damn this feels momentous. Because this matters. The other one did, too, but that was to ensure we didn’t F something up. This matters because this MATTERS,” Strzok texted just days after the Russia probe began in July 2016.

“It almost sounds like they were going through the motions with the Clinton investigation—but boy they sure were excited about the Russia one,” Gowdy said.

Gowdy noted that on Aug. 6, 2016, Page texted Strzok, who was leading the FBI’s Russia investigation, telling him that he was “meant to protect the country from that menace.”

But a new text revealed in Horowitz’s report last week, from Aug. 8, 2016, revealing Strzok vowing to “stop” Trump from becoming president.

According to the report, Page texted Strzok in August 2016 and said: “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”

“No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it,” Strzok responded.

Gowdy said that text message was evidence that Strzok had “already prejudged the outcome,” noting that Strzok “already determined Trump should not be president of the United States” just days into the investigation.

By August 15, 2016, Strzok and Page texted about an “insurance policy” should Trump become president.

“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office - that there’s no way he gets elected - but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk,” Strzok texted on Aug. 15, 2016. “It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”

Horowitz testified, in response to Gowdy’s timeline and the texts between Strzok and Page, that the bias found here was “extremely serious.”

“I can’t imagine FBI agents even suggesting that they would use their powers to investigate any candidate for office,” Horowitz said. “I thought this was completely antithetical to the core values of the department and extremely serious.”

The office of the inspector general, though, found no evidence that the bias found impacted prosecutorial decisions in the Clinton email probe.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Yep, no bias at all!

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/19/ig-confirms-is-reviewing-whether-strzoks-anti-trump-bias-impacted-launch-russia-probe.html

 

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz confirmed Tuesday that he is investigating whether FBI official Peter Strzok’s anti-Trump bias factored into the launch of the bureau’s Russia probe.

During a joint hearing before the House Oversight and Judiciary committees, Horowitz testified that his office was reviewing Strzok’s anti-Trump text messages as part of a separate probe related to the Russia investigation.

“It clearly shows a biased state of mind,” Horowitz said, referring to text messages written as the FBI probe of Hillary Clinton's private email use was wrapping up and the Russia probe was getting underway.

The most infamous text, revealed in last week's IG report on the Clinton email case, showed Strzok responding "We'll stop it" when his colleague and lover Lisa Page sought assurances that Trump would not become president.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., questioned Horowitz on whether that apparent bias influenced the initiation of the investigation into Russia interference in the 2016 campaign and potential collusion with Trump's team.

“That’s a matter we’ve got under review and are looking at right now,” Horowitz said.

It was revealed earlier this year that Horowitz’s office was investigating allegations of government surveillance abuse tied to the start of the Russia probe. But Horowitz’s testimony, meant to answer questions about the conclusion of the Clinton case review, revealed some of the specifics involved in the ongoing Russia case review, including the Strzok texts.

Goodlatte pressed Horowitz over the politically charged text messages -- which the report described as “hostile” -- and noted how several were sent near the start of the Russia probe.

“Correct,” Horowitz said. “In fact, there were these other text messages in roughly the same time period.”

The exchange came minutes after House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., also outlined the curious timing of a string of texts between Strzok and Page, just as the Russia probe, which Strzok was involved in, was beginning.

Gowdy laid out a timeline—beginning July 5, 2016 when Comey recommended no criminal charges against Clinton, to July 28, 2016, when the FBI initiated a counterintelligence investigation into the Russia issue.

“Three weeks after Clinton is exonerated by Comey, Strzok is leading the investigation into Russia and coordination with the Trump campaign,” Gowdy said Tuesday.

“And damn this feels momentous. Because this matters. The other one did, too, but that was to ensure we didn’t F something up. This matters because this MATTERS,” Strzok texted just days after the Russia probe began in July 2016.

“It almost sounds like they were going through the motions with the Clinton investigation—but boy they sure were excited about the Russia one,” Gowdy said.

Gowdy noted that on Aug. 6, 2016, Page texted Strzok, who was leading the FBI’s Russia investigation, telling him that he was “meant to protect the country from that menace.”

But a new text revealed in Horowitz’s report last week, from Aug. 8, 2016, revealing Strzok vowing to “stop” Trump from becoming president.

According to the report, Page texted Strzok in August 2016 and said: “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”

“No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it,” Strzok responded.

Gowdy said that text message was evidence that Strzok had “already prejudged the outcome,” noting that Strzok “already determined Trump should not be president of the United States” just days into the investigation.

By August 15, 2016, Strzok and Page texted about an “insurance policy” should Trump become president.

“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office - that there’s no way he gets elected - but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk,” Strzok texted on Aug. 15, 2016. “It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”

Horowitz testified, in response to Gowdy’s timeline and the texts between Strzok and Page, that the bias found here was “extremely serious.”

“I can’t imagine FBI agents even suggesting that they would use their powers to investigate any candidate for office,” Horowitz said. “I thought this was completely antithetical to the core values of the department and extremely serious.”

The office of the inspector general, though, found no evidence that the bias found impacted prosecutorial decisions in the Clinton email probe.

 

Yeah, Slo Nutt may have tapped out now.

 

For those who regard Gowdy as all bark and no bite remember he's not prosecuting these conspirators; Huber is.

[SenatorRock 708]

The MSM will never report on yesterday and today's testimony by Horowitz, but it is very damning.

 

They can hide behind their faux outrage over 2000 brown kids temporarily staying in a summer camp while their criminal mommy gets her legal matters in order.

 

That may distract the low info crowd, it will not distract the IG or the DOJ.

 

The Swamp is fixing to be drained.

[Sho Nuff 719]

The MSM will never report on yesterday and today's testimony by Horowitz, but it is very damning.

 

They can hide behind their faux outrage over 2000 brown kids temporarily staying in a summer camp while their criminal mommy gets her legal matters in order.

 

That may distract the low info crowd, it will not distract the IG or the DOJ.

 

The Swamp is fixing to be drained.

You all are the low info crowd...you are in full support for f the swamp.

[lickin_starfish 1,477]

I support F the swamp too.

The swamp should be effed.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

I support F the swamp too.

The swamp should be effed.

 

#metoo

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

https://mobile.twitter.com/PoliticalEye17/status/1009115546485325824/video/1

 

 

Rosenstein sh!tcanned Friday per Rep. Jackson-Lee............how would she know?

[Mr. Hand 482]

You all are the low info crowd

That simply isn't true.

[Baker Boy 1,478]

It is very easy to see why The SloMeatHead cannot get a job in this robust economy.

[Sho Nuff 719]

It is very easy to see why The SloMeatHead cannot get a job in this robust economy.

 

I have a job.

You should try posting something factual for once in your life.

[Mr. Hand 482]

 

I have a job.

You should try posting something factual for once in your life.

Getting off on being a richard to people on message boards is not a job. HTH

[drobeski 3,061]

Strzok was escorted out of the building Friday

[Hardcore troubadour 12,589]

So our top law enforcement agencies upper echelon conspired to take down a President and it doesn't bother anyone on the left. Party before country. Scumbags.

[LOD01 185]

So our top law enforcement agencies upper echelon conspired to take down a President and it doesn't bother anyone on the left. Party before country. Scumbags.

Bother them? You kidding. They probably had their dicks in each others hands jacking each other off in the hopes that Trump would be taken down. All they did was blow their wads in each others face.

[Sho Nuff 719]

Conspire to take down a President is a bogus claim...but whatever floats your boat.

The point is they were, to a flaw, putting country over everyone.

Many of them lifelong republicans (a point always missed by the Trump loving twits).

[LOD01 185]

Conspire to take down a President is a bogus claim...but whatever floats your boat.

The point is they were, to a flaw, putting country over everyone.

Many of them lifelong republicans (a point always missed by the Trump loving twits).

Continuing to showcase your low IQ I see.

 

In one message before the election, Page asked Strzok, "Trump's not ever going to be president, right? Right?!"

"No. No he won't. We'll stop it," Strzok replied.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,493]

Continuing to showcase your low IQ I see.

 

In one message before the election, Page asked Strzok, "Trump's not ever going to be president, right? Right?!"

"No. No he won't. We'll stop it," Strzok replied.

 

Stop feeding the trolls, LOD. He'll run back to his safespace at communistguys.com.

[Sho Nuff 719]

Continuing to showcase your low IQ I see.

 

In one message before the election, Page asked Strzok, "Trump's not ever going to be president, right? Right?!"

"No. No he won't. We'll stop it," Strzok replied.

A. He said conspiring against a President. He wouldnt have been President at that time, correct?

B. And they took zero action on those words. Another key point you ignorant fools always forget.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,589]

I guess starting the bogus Russian collusion investigation wasn't taking action.

[Mr. Hand 482]

A. He said conspiring against a President. He wouldnt have been President at that time, correct?

B. And they took zero action on those words. Another key point you ignorant fools always forget.

You need to stop. You aren’t well.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,493]

You need to stop. You aren’t well.

 

stop feeding the trolls.