Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Mike Honcho

F.B.I. Raids Office of Trump’s Longtime Lawyer Michael Cohen

Recommended Posts

Then you need to read more. In the scope of his work Mueller sees something not related to Russia. He passes it off to the FBI (after consulting the AGs office). They had actual evidence to show a possible crime to be able to obtain these warrants. Why did Mueller do that? Because it wasnt about Russia but came through the course of his work.

Thats what happens. To just call it a fishing expedition is ridiculous and what I come to expect from the drobeski types...not you.

So yes...very unreasonable to just assume they will take whatever no matter if it was legal to do so or not. Seems like excise making in case something comes of this.

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

80+ pages of gibberish from the girls over the Russian investigation---and crickets here.

 

I do find that funny.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Then you need to read more. In the scope of his work Mueller sees something not related to Russia. He passes it off to the FBI (after consulting the AGs office). They had actual evidence to show a possible crime to be able to obtain these warrants. Why did Mueller do that? Because it wasnt about Russia but came through the course of his work.

Thats what happens. To just call it a fishing expedition is ridiculous and what I come to expect from the drobeski types...not you.

So yes...very unreasonable to just assume they will take whatever no matter if it was legal to do so or not. Seems like excise making in case something comes of this.

 

Ohhhhh boy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol:

 

 

We are seeing the result of an indoctrinated socially engineered individual. He can’t help it.

 

You two laughing and callng someone else idoctrinated is hilarious. You spew nothing but Foxnews all day whining about Liberals.

Point me to anything I stated that was wrong?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When talking politics on this board, we've now reached the point in which one side will explain the law, and the other side will simply dismiss it by saying that they know for a fact the other side will simply ignore the law. (Oh, and in this case, the Trump supporters simply ignore the fact that Trump/Republican appointees are the ones that they say will simply ignore the law).

 

In other words, there is no sense in trying to have a real discussion. Instead, it's time to just focus on trolling, making jokes, laughing at the other side, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so basically what he have is an investigation in search of a crime.

Exactly. Please explain to me what this has to do with Russian collusion.

 

Awesome precedent too. I'm also ignoring that if this was Hillary the complaining would be off the charts... But an investigation can be started with literally no evidence and now you can just rummage through whatever you want trying to find something and are able to go as far as writing a personal attorneys Office?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly. Please explain to me what this has to do with Russian collusion.

 

Awesome precedent too. I'm also ignoring that if this was Hillary the complaining would be off the charts... But an investigation can be started with literally no evidence and now you can just rummage through whatever you want trying to find something and are able to go as far as writing a personal attorneys Office?

Is it at all possible they already have something? Thus the search warrant that was signed ff by the Justice Department? Asking for a friend.

 

oh and it only took three pages but HILLARY!!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly. Please explain to me what this has to do with Russian collusion.

 

Awesome precedent too. I'm also ignoring that if this was Hillary the complaining would be off the charts... But an investigation can be started with literally no evidence and now you can just rummage through whatever you want trying to find something and are able to go as far as writing a personal attorneys Office?

 

Please explain to me what you didn't understand about this doesnt have to do with Russian collusion?

Honcho and I both explained that this was passed off because it didn't have to do with it.

What precedent? That in the course of a legal investigation, special counsel sees things that lead to a crime he isn't supposed to pass it on to the AG?

The investigation by Mueller was started with actual evidence (so claiming literally no evidence was false). This investigation into Cohen was started because of evidence. So again, that assertion is wrong.

He isn't just rummaging through whatever he wants to try and find something. He passed off in the information about the personal attorney because of what he saw.

 

Also...it was only a matter of time with Cohen being investigated by someone after Trump claimed he didn't know about any of the NDA stuff. he threw Cohen under the bus with that.

Its not an investigation just in search of a crime...there is evidence of a crime...which led to a warrant.

Thats how the system works.

 

Also...if it was Hillary...the GOP congress would have moved to impeach months ago and you all would be crying bloody murder from the start of all of this instead of making excuses like you all have for Trump.

If someone has evidence that Hillary committed a crime...put her in jail...not sure how many more times that needs to be posted on here...but apparently you all believe everyone here thinks Hillary should be above the law.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it at all possible they already have something? Thus the search warrant that was signed ff by the Justice Department? Asking for a friend.

 

oh and it only took three pages but HILLARY!!!!!!!

 

Likely yes from all I have read.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Likely yes from all I have read from the liberal news sources I would like to already believe.

FIFY

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FIFY

 

BBC is liberal? WSJ? Or is anything that doesn't paint this as a witch hunt liberal to you?

So really...you just want to be a Cdub/Drobeski type?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it at all possible they already have something? Thus the search warrant that was signed ff by the Justice Department? Asking for a friend.

 

oh and it only took three pages but HILLARY!!!!!!!

 

Nope. The Trump appointed U.S. Attorney obviously quickly signed off on a fishing expedition in hopes of randomly finding something criminal about the man that appointed him to his job. That's how things work.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Given the theatrics surrounding everything these days it may be more misdirection.

 

Trump complains about Sessions, I.G., etc....week later we find out they've been assigned a prosecutor for months and a grand jury has been empaneled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

very moderate of you

:lol:

Call it as I see it. The look at HILLARY deflection is ridiculous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Call it as I see it. The look at HILLARY deflection is ridiculous.

ok, then you and all the other moderates would be ok if the DOJ and FBI treated this investigation as a matter, pre exoneration, no statements or testimony under oath, allowing of the destruction of evidence and immunity granted to those involved in the potential crimes committed. Correct ?

Do you agree it would be fair to mueller to perform the matter the same way and blatantly unfair and factual sign of bias if they didnt ? And they should?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Call it as I see it. The look at HILLARY deflection is ridiculous.

Oh calm the fock down.... You make it sound like I said Hillary 30 times in one post. I pretty clearly mentioned it in passing just to point out the hypocrisy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh calm the fock down.... You make it sound like I said Hillary 30 times in one post. I pretty clearly mentioned it in passing just to point out the hypocrisy.

Oh it's not just you.....Its just kind of the running thing here..You know this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh it's not just you.....Its just kind of the running thing here..You know this

I hear ya. Didn't intend to deflect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, then you and all the other moderates would be ok if the DOJ and FBI treated this investigation as a matter, pre exoneration, no statements or testimony under oath, allowing of the destruction of evidence and immunity granted to those involved in the potential crimes committed. Correct ?

Do you agree it would be fair to mueller to perform the matter the same way and blatantly unfair and factual sign of bias if they didnt ? And they should?

Awe sweetie..I cant speak for "all the other moderates" sorry.

 

As far as your question...I read it a few times and I have no idea what you just said. But sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously the FBI is against Donald just like the CIA, the media, Hollywood, porn stars, Congress, the GOP etc. :cry:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously the FBI is against Donald just like the CIA, the media, Hollywood, porn stars, Congress, the GOP etc. :cry:

Don't forget his appointed AG and deputy AG are also against him.

 

For all the deep state talk of the democrats...maybe its been Pence behind the scenes the whole time...setting Trump up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously the FBI is against Donald just like the CIA, the media, Hollywood, porn stars, Congress, the GOP etc. :cry:

Drug dealers....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny there were numerous FISA warrants, the harderst warrants to obtain, to surveil Carter Page, yet no charges. And we're not supposed to question the FBI, NSA, et al when it comes to this president? Witch hunt.

 

3:32 EST. :ninja:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly. Please explain to me what this has to do with Russian collusion.

 

Awesome precedent too. I'm also ignoring that if this was Hillary the complaining would be off the charts... But an investigation can be started with literally no evidence and now you can just rummage through whatever you want trying to find something and are able to go as far as writing a personal attorneys Office?

 

Sounds like something the Nazis would literally do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget his appointed AG and deputy AG are also against him.

 

For all the deep state talk of the democrats...maybe its been Pence behind the scenes the whole time...setting Trump up.

(Mueller gets mask taken off and it's Pence)

 

"And I would have gotten away with it too if it wasn't for you meddling kids!!)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought supermike didn't about political discussion? Got tired of acting like you didn't care and jumped right in I see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(Mueller gets mask taken off and it's Pence)

 

"And I would have gotten away with it too if it wasn't for you meddling kids!!)

 

Mueller is fred...maybe Comey is in the mask.

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Nope. The Trump appointed U.S. Attorney obviously quickly signed off on a fishing expedition in hopes of randomly finding something criminal about the man that appointed him to his job. That's how things work.

Thats how it works when you live in batsh1t crazy conspiracy theory land.

 

Which most of this bored does :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Meuller investigating Ukrainian oligarch who gave Trump 150k.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought supermike didn't about political discussion? Got tired of acting like you didn't care and jumped right in I see.

Most of the discussion here is littered with childish name calling crap. This one I find interesting. I'm not so sure it's political, it's more strictly a criminal issue in my mind. But I can see that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of the discussion here is littered with childish name calling crap. This one I find interesting. I'm not so sure it's political, it's more strictly a criminal issue in my mind. But I can see that.

If it's a criminal issue, i would think you would wait for charges before weighing in. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's a criminal issue, i would think you would wait for charges before weighing in. :dunno:

Really? You never have a thought on a criminal issue before charges are filed? Thats absurd. Stop being silly.

 

Oh and also.....I haven't given an opinion on what they are after, what was found, or what the implications are. I just found it very interesting.....and I am waiting for the next step. I don't know what will happen next however.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really? You never have a thought on a criminal issue before charges are filed? Thats absurd. Stop being silly.

 

Oh and also.....I haven't given an opinion on what they are after, what was found, or what the implications are. I just found it very interesting.....and I am waiting for the next step. I don't know what will happen next however.

That you commented at all in any way that wasn't a full on defense of Trump made you a target to Team Trump here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×