One link expressly states "Destroyed" in the title. Another has Brazile stating the DNC didn't hold on to the (servers). Are you seriously arguing that there is any meaningful difference between "destroying" and her statement of not holding on to the servers? Especially when she says that in response to a question about destroying the servers?
Standard practice for computer forensic examination is to preserve the original machine and make copies of its hard drive or whatever it is, not destroy or get rid of the original. Working with a copy, or supposed copy provided to you by someone else, you could never really be sure if you had a complete copy of all of the data that was on the machine. That's the point of going to the original. Your claim of "standard practice" based on your vast experience is a joke. This is another example of you trying to get over on an appeal to authority, which you don't really have. This is just more evidence of your worthlessness.
The title states it...in single quotes. And it never stated servers (as you have been told by both me and Saints.
Are you seriously arguing that putting that in the title like that is something?
Thats your supposed link here?
and my guess is you believe they were destroyed...without evidence...just as you believe other things...without evidence supporting it...
But then you also don't believe Russia hacking has been shown...despite evidence saying so as well as just about every sane person stating it happened.
Its really funny.
My claim of standard practice is a joke? Really? So you don't think standard practice is the first thing you do is make a copy? You better try backing that up with something....but you won't.
My worthlessness...this is still yet a funny claim given your dismissal of facts...and the assertions you have been making in here.