Jump to content

Strike

Members
  • Content Count

    35,158
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    41

Strike last won the day on March 12

Strike had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

3,879 Excellent

About Strike

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

30,634 profile views
  1. Strike

    Timmy’s thread for serious discussion and debate

    I told you SPECIFICALLY how they lied. The following statement from their article is FACTUALLY incorrect: There is no geolocation data. They know this. They acknowledged it over the weekend. And they're probably going to get sued over it.
  2. Strike

    Timmy’s thread for serious discussion and debate

    It's related to a false report by the AP trying to suggest that a candidate named Bernie Moreno had an account on Adult Friend Finder in 2008. Here is a story from a site you like about the issue: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/03/ohio-senate-race-bernie-moreno-adult-friend-finder-explained.html However, this story is several days old and omits new information, specifically that the AP claimed in TWO separate stories to have confirmed where the account was created using "geolocation data." That statement is factually incorrect and is likely to result in a lawsuit. They published this story a few days before the primary. The Dems are rolling with it but no other media is. Which was the intent. And it's likely to result in a lawsuit. So, given that info, what do you think of the AP's antics?
  3. Strike

    Timmy’s thread for serious discussion and debate

    No, I won't provide you with a link. The only sites reporting the issue accurately are ones you won't believe, and you don't have the intelligence to see through the spin that the AP and other sites are putting on this story. So, you can wallow in your ignorance. Very typical Tim.
  4. Strike

    Timmy’s thread for serious discussion and debate

    @The Real timschochet What do you think about the AP trying to interfere in an election primary by publishing a factually incorrect hit piece on a Trump endorsed candidate just before the primary? Seems kind of shady don't you think? Not something a reputable news organization would do.
  5. Strike

    Kyle Rittenhouse - Criminal or Hero?

    It's what squiz uses to arrange his homo dates.
  6. Strike

    Kyle Rittenhouse - Criminal or Hero?

    Says the guy who follows people around and posts quotes of theirs without context YEARS later to try to pull a "gotcha" on them.
  7. Strike

    Kyle Rittenhouse - Criminal or Hero?

    Guess what none of those words have in common? None are PROPER nouns.
  8. Strike

    Kyle Rittenhouse - Criminal or Hero?

    Those aren't proper names. You're such a little weasel. But hey, you keep pushing your credibility further and further in the mud. Good for you, I guess.
  9. Strike

    Kyle Rittenhouse - Criminal or Hero?

    Dude, you don't typo a proper name. Nor does spell check change "trayvon" to "trevon." Just admit it. You focked up. And SAY HIS NAME!!!!!!
  10. Strike

    Kyle Rittenhouse - Criminal or Hero?

    That was not a typo you lying POS. Nice try though
  11. Strike

    Kyle Rittenhouse - Criminal or Hero?

    Like you give a sh*t. And for the record, his name is spelled Trayvon Martin. If you're gonna virtue signal like you care, at least spell his name correctly. SAY HIS NAME SQUIZZY!!!!!
  12. Strike

    Bloodbath?

    Libs didn't care when Biden was calling for VIOLENCE!!!! https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/07/bernie-sanders-attacks-joe-biden-mini-super-tuesday
  13. Dude, at a certain point you just have to ignore him. He says he provides "evidence" but all he provides are talking points. He's like @The Real timschochet. We provide ACTUAL, INDISPUTABLE evidence and he says "see they ignore my evidence talking points."
  14. This is as far as I had to go. If you missed it then yes you missed it but Biden knowingly took classified documents. And that's illegal. The report even said so. It just said he was too old and feeble to prosecute which, the last time I looked, were NOT valid reasons not to prosecute someone. I'm sorry you're so misinformed.
×