Jump to content



Photo

Watcing the Trump Presser Now


  • Please log in to reply
243 replies to this topic

#41 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 11,810 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:23 AM

Asked directly if his people had contact with Russia...he deflects to China hacking and Hillary rather than answering.

Hmm...

 

 

What a focking train wreck. Can't believe some folks actually voted for this

 

 

FULL METAL TILT     :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#42 wiffleball

wiffleball

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 50,915 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:24 AM

Wow. That was bizarre. 

He even ended it with his 

apprentice TagLine: 

"You're fired!" 

 

That whole thing was just effing weird. 

 

And CNN went out of their way NOT to publish the uncorroborated information. 

I know, I listened last night - and wondered what the hell was so salacious.  

But Buzzfeed released it later.  - And Trump & his Press Secy got confused. 

Kind of hard to conflate Buzzfeed with CNN, but hey...

Welcome to a Post-Fact Society.  


Users currently on :ignore: BudBro,Flahawker

#43 Frozenbeernuts

Frozenbeernuts

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 16,043 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:24 AM

I hope he does increase focus on hacking defense. I would like to see what we currently do about hacking defense and what the new administration considers more or better defense. Is it just spend more on it? Are there better specialists out there that need to be brought in?

#44 Sho Nuff

Sho Nuff

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 49,750 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:26 AM

 

Should he try to appease the Dems base of phags/cat smackers, those that use abortion as birth control, drug addicts, felons, illegals, pacifists, unemployed welfare baby mamas, thugs, etc?

 

He should try running the country rather than appeasing idiots.



#45 Hardcore troubadour

Hardcore troubadour

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 16,383 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:27 AM

Don't waste your breath. The usual crowd of circle jerkers and aliases will declare that drobeski "won" something and that'll be that :rolleyes:


Hey look, Worms said alias blah blah blah.

#46 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 11,810 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:30 AM

 

He should try running the country rather than appeasing idiots.

 

You guys can't be appeased. You guys complain he didn't address some of this earlier then whine like a b!tch when he tells you it's false and to GFY. 

 

As far as running the country; he is. He's putting boot to the media's a$$ to put them in their place and heads at the Intelligence agencies are going to focking roll.


BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#47 wiffleball

wiffleball

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 50,915 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:30 AM

Just for context, please remember that the most damaging

electronic intelligence leaks ever incurred by the US Govt

(including military, diplomatic, congressional and executive) 

came NOT from what we commonly refer to as 'hacking'. 

 

Rather, it came from the troika of Manning, Snowden and

Assange. And really involved the physical porting of data

from government servers to sources physically outside of 

the confines of the servers. 

 

No agenda there other than education. 

I can't believe we as a country are so repeatedly and 

thoroughly electronically compromised by 

otherwise 2nd and 3rd world nation-states. 


Users currently on :ignore: BudBro,Flahawker

#48 Sho Nuff

Sho Nuff

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 49,750 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:33 AM

 

You guys can't be appeased. You guys complain he didn't address some of this earlier then whine like a b!tch when he tells you it's false and to GFY. 

 

As far as running the country; he is. He's putting boot to the media's a$$ to put them in their place and heads at the Intelligence agencies are going to focking roll.

 

A.  Sure we can...by running the country and not acting like he has been.  Didn't address what?  He didn't...he ignored the actual questions.  Telling us its false is pretty useless when he (like you all here) offers nothing more than his word and apparently Putins.

B.  He is?  He is putting no boot to anything other than throwing a childish temper tantrum about the media.  That you think what he is doing is a good thing shows what a focking hack you are.  Fock...there really is no hope for people like you.



#49 Frozenbeernuts

Frozenbeernuts

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 16,043 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:35 AM

Just for context, please remember that the most damaging
electronic intelligence leaks ever incurred by the US Govt
(including military, diplomatic, congressional and executive) 
came NOT from what we commonly refer to as 'hacking'. 
 
Rather, it came from the troika of Manning, Snowden and
Assange. And really involved the physical porting of data
from government servers to sources physically outside of 
the confines of the servers. 
 
No agenda there other than education. 
I can't believe we as a country are so repeatedly and 
thoroughly electronically compromised by 
otherwise 2nd and 3rd world nation-states. 


Maybe not the government, but our information is stored on business servers that are unquestionably hacked constantly. It's impossible to stop. I still would like to see something that talks about if there could be more done about hacking and how much more.

I was reading something about the new way we will bank with technology. There was talk of bio recognition that can't be hacked. Yeah right. I refuse to believe hackers can't somehow fool what ever it is they are hacking into thinking it is reading a particular persons voice or finger prints or whatever metric they use.

#50 NewbieJr

NewbieJr

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 54,159 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:38 AM

 

You guys can't be appeased. You guys complain he didn't address some of this earlier then whine like a b!tch when he tells you it's false and to GFY. 

 

As far as running the country; he is. He's putting boot to the media's a$$ to put them in their place and heads at the Intelligence agencies are going to focking roll.

In Trump's childish world, you are either a fan who never questions him, or you are the enemy. It's only natural that he'd hate the press, considering Trump's constant aversion of the truth.  As for the intelligence department, their conclusion that Russia hacked us to sway the election may cause someone to think that's why Trump one. The Donald's paper-thin ego just could never handle that, so they automatically become the enemy.

He's not running the country. He's trying to tear down anyone who calls him out on his constant lies. He puts the country far behind that. It's all about Donald.


Mine is small, but the head spins.

#51 IGotWorms

IGotWorms

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 48,182 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:38 AM

master electrician is more of a side job thing..a hobby almost. During the day I'm designing building programming and commissioning highly complicated control systems for billion dollar biotech companies.
Other than that I'm just a dummy plumbah. :)


"Highly complicated control systems":

https://i.ytimg.com/...xresdefault.jpg

#52 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 11,810 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:41 AM

 

A.  Sure we can...by running the country and not acting like he has been.  Didn't address what?  He didn't...he ignored the actual questions.  Telling us its false is pretty useless when he (like you all here) offers nothing more than his word and apparently Putins.

B.  He is?  He is putting no boot to anything other than throwing a childish temper tantrum about the media.  That you think what he is doing is a good thing shows what a focking hack you are.  Fock...there really is no hope for people like you.

 

The butthurt is strong in this one. Gonna be a long eight years for you. Maybe you should stock up on tissues and wash all your love socks then lock yourself in the basement.

 

:lol:


BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#53 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 11,810 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:43 AM

In Trump's childish world, you are either a fan who never questions him, or you are the enemy. It's only natural that he'd hate the press, considering Trump's constant aversion of the truth.  As for the intelligence department, their conclusion that Russia hacked us to sway the election may cause someone to think that's why Trump one. The Donald's paper-thin ego just could never handle that, so they automatically become the enemy.

He's not running the country. He's trying to tear down anyone who calls him out on his constant lies. He puts the country far behind that. It's all about Donald.

 

He's already done more for the country than Hillary would have. People have died because of her; you'd do well to remember that.


BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#54 Sho Nuff

Sho Nuff

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 49,750 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:43 AM

 

The butthurt is strong in this one. Gonna be a long eight years for you. Maybe you should stock up on tissues and wash all your love socks then lock yourself in the basement.

 

:lol:

 

If this is what you considering running circles around people...wow.  Carry on chief...always good for a laugh.



#55 Sho Nuff

Sho Nuff

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 49,750 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:45 AM

 

He's already done more for the country than Hillary would have. People have died because of her; you'd do well to remember that.

 

:lol:



#56 wiffleball

wiffleball

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 50,915 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:45 AM

Maybe not the government, but our information is stored on business servers that are unquestionably hacked constantly. It's impossible to stop. I still would like to see something that talks about if there could be more done about hacking and how much more.

I was reading something about the new way we will bank with technology. There was talk of bio recognition that can't be hacked. Yeah right. I refuse to believe hackers can't somehow fool what ever it is they are hacking into thinking it is reading a particular persons voice or finger prints or whatever metric they use.

My BF is IT Director for a Big Data company. He was talking about how the 'new' thing

is not pass'words', but pass'phrases'. And allegedly, it would take XX years for current 

pass-crackers to break such a structure. 

 

 

He knows a LOT more than I do, but I couldn't help but be incredibly skeptical. 

Maybe just because I have a memory; 

I remember when all the big data companies told us that simply adding Caps mixes

and numerics would do the same. 

 

THAT 'uncrackable' security lasted about as long as a fart in a windstorm.

 

As far as spoofing biometrics go, I think that's misguided. 

it is MUCH more difficult to replicate individual bio-markers.

So, if you're even half-competent, what do you do?  

You don't replicate the bio-markers, you hit it from the recognition/reader

side. That way, every marker looks like a 'hit' / 'winner'.  


Users currently on :ignore: BudBro,Flahawker

#57 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 11,810 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:45 AM

 

If this is what you considering running circles around people YOU. 

 

It doesn't take much.......  :dunno:

 

:lol:


BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#58 Sho Nuff

Sho Nuff

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 49,750 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:46 AM

 

It doesn't take much.......  :dunno:

 

:lol:

 

Takes far more than you will ever have chief.



#59 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 11,810 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:47 AM

 

:lol:

 

I laugh sometimes too when people die but it's people that deserve it. People that died in Benghazi didn't deserve it.  :shocking:

 

Tilting like the Titanic.  :lol:


BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#60 Sho Nuff

Sho Nuff

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 49,750 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:51 AM

 

I laugh sometimes too when people die but it's people that deserve it. People that died in Benghazi didn't deserve it.  :shocking:

 

Tilting like the Titanic.  :lol:

 

Yes...you are...since you think that is what I was laughing at.



#61 gocolts

gocolts

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 35,107 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:52 AM

Well, CNN's going to go completely apeshiit the rest of the day.,,

 

 

I would like someone to ask Trump what organization he considers NOT

to be 'fake news'.  I mean, he even side-eyed the BBC for fock's sake.

 

But, I guess we know he'd say that 'some of the people at Fox

(aka Hannity) are very good journalists...'  

HAHA.  THAT was focking hilarious.  Fock CNN.  I hope he trashes them at every press conference and NEVER lets them ask a s single question.  


Go Colts!!!!

#62 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 11,810 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:54 AM

 

Yes...you are...since you think that is what I was laughing at.

 

It's hard to discern the inner workings of that retard mind of yours. If you voted Hillary then you might well laugh at innocent lives being lost by your candidate.  :dunno:


BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#63 giraldi02

giraldi02

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 4,877 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:54 AM

While my sentiments on Buzzfeed are the same as Trump's...

This dude is setting a very dangerous precedent on selectively answering questions from sources only he deems as credible. It's a giant step towards state-run media. It's not even a slippery slope fallacy. He belittled BBC news during this press conference. Sorry, but I'll take BBC over any of the US MSM outlets. 

 

Additionally, his rhetoric on leaked info is very dangerous to a clandestine administration. Transparency is the very thing he ran his campaign on when bashing Clinton. If he's unhappy with people knowing, or curious about, what's going on, he's in the wrong job


WPIAFP

 


#64 Sho Nuff

Sho Nuff

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 49,750 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:54 AM

HAHA.  THAT was focking hilarious.  Fock CNN.  I hope he trashes them at every press conference and NEVER lets them ask a s single question.  

 

Problem is...he bashed them for what buzzfeed did.  His berating them was about things he was wrong about.

Poor form both from the reporter and Trump on that one.



#65 Sho Nuff

Sho Nuff

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 49,750 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:55 AM

 

It's hard to discern the inner workings of that retard mind of yours. If you voted Hillary then you might well laugh at innocent lives being lost by your candidate.  :dunno:

Well...I didn't...but you keep up the effort kid...practice makes perfect.



#66 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 11,810 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:57 AM

 

Problem is...he bashed them for what buzzfeed did.  His berating them was about things he was wrong about.

Poor form both from the reporter and Trump on that one.

 

He bashed them for running with the story in the first place instead of waiting to substantiate like some other news organization chose to. 


BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#67 cyclone24

cyclone24

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 11,109 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:57 AM

Im trying to give Trump a fair shake. But I just paid 2.59 a gallon of gas. Not off to a good start.

Oh the glory days of 2 bucks a gallon under BO.


JFC...someone else tell him...i cant..just can't
"There are five real good recruits in the state. We got three of them. One couldn’t get into school, and the other went to (the University of) Iowa...which is about the same thing." - Coach Johnny Orr

#68 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 11,810 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:58 AM

Well...I didn't...but you keep up the effort kid...practice makes perfect.

 

Sure you didn't.  :rolleyes:

 

The only thing that would make me stomping you better is giving you a donkey punch at the end.  :lol:


BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#69 Sho Nuff

Sho Nuff

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 49,750 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 12:01 PM

 

He bashed them for running with the story in the first place instead of waiting to substantiate like some other news organization chose to. 

 

You should read what they actually reported...he confused them with buzzfeed.

Posted in the other thread an article from the NYTimes about this and how CNN reported it.

Nothing in what they did was fake news.



#70 Kanil

Kanil

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 2,103 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 12:01 PM

Just for context, please remember that the most damaging

electronic intelligence leaks ever incurred by the US Govt

(including military, diplomatic, congressional and executive) 

came NOT from what we commonly refer to as 'hacking'. 

 

Rather, it came from the troika of Manning, Snowden and

Assange. And really involved the physical porting of data

from government servers to sources physically outside of 

the confines of the servers. 

 

No agenda there other than education. 

I can't believe we as a country are so repeatedly and 

thoroughly electronically compromised by 

otherwise 2nd and 3rd world nation-states. 

 

The one in 2015 was absolutely a hack.  And they'd been in the system since 2012.  Pulled massive amounts of data including security clearance investigation reports.  China knows everything about everyone that's had a security clearance in the US in the last 10ish years.



#71 wiffleball

wiffleball

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 50,915 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 12:03 PM

 

He bashed them for running with the story in the first place instead of waiting to substantiate like some other news organization chose to. 

You really don't understand facts, do you?  

 

CNN specifically did NOT 'run with the story' because, as salacious as the details were/are, 

they couldn't find anyone to corroborate the charges mentioned in the two page addendum.

That's what journalists are supposed to do. 

Buzzfeed couldn't help themselves in light of the sleaze factor listed in the intelligence 

briefing's addendum - and they did, in fact, 'run with it'.  - Without substantiation or 

corroboration. 

 

I really wish you''d try to educate yourself. 

I don't mind people who disagree - as long 

as they make even a minimal effort to learn

something on their own. 


Users currently on :ignore: BudBro,Flahawker

#72 NewbieJr

NewbieJr

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 54,159 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 12:04 PM

 

He's already done more for the country than Hillary would have. People have died because of her; you'd do well to remember that.

LOL  Glad to see that you're one of the mental midgets who bought all the fake news stories.  Trump is very thankful for your type.


Mine is small, but the head spins.

#73 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 11,810 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 12:06 PM

 

You should read what they actually reported...he confused them with buzzfeed.

Posted in the other thread an article from the NYTimes about this and how CNN reported it.

Nothing in what they did was fake news.

 

I posted the CNN link and did read it. Had you maintained an open mind while listening to the press conference, you'd have picked up on him giving props to those that chose to avoid the obvious hit piece funded by Anti-Trump Republicans and Democrats.


BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#74 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 11,810 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 12:13 PM

You really don't understand facts, do you?  

 

CNN specifically did NOT 'run with the story' because, as salacious as the details were/are, 

they couldn't find anyone to corroborate the charges mentioned in the two page addendum.

That's what journalists are supposed to do. 

Buzzfeed couldn't help themselves in light of the sleaze factor listed in the intelligence 

briefing's addendum - and they did, in fact, 'run with it'.  - Without substantiation or 

corroboration. 

 

I really wish you''d try to educate yourself. 

I don't mind people who disagree - as long 

as they make even a minimal effort to learn

something on their own. 

 

http://www.fftodayfo...=461987&page=17

 

They DID run with it yesterday and I posted it. What they didn't do was run with ALL the details but they ran with the story all the same. Seems cut and dry to those actually listening and reading.

 

:doh:  


BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#75 mobb_deep

mobb_deep

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 15,224 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 12:13 PM

While my sentiments on Buzzfeed are the same as Trump's...

This dude is setting a very dangerous precedent on selectively answering questions from sources only he deems as credible. It's a giant step towards state-run media. It's not even a slippery slope fallacy. He belittled BBC news during this press conference. Sorry, but I'll take BBC over any of the US MSM outlets. 

 

Additionally, his rhetoric on leaked info is very dangerous to a clandestine administration. Transparency is the very thing he ran his campaign on when bashing Clinton. If he's unhappy with people knowing, or curious about, what's going on, he's in the wrong job

 

You expect something different from a totalitarian with a god complex?


Sangre Por Sangre


#76 IGotWorms

IGotWorms

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 48,182 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 12:15 PM

 
The butthurt is strong in this one. Gonna be a long eight years for you. Maybe you should stock up on tissues and wash all your love socks then lock yourself in the basement.
 
:lol:


At this moment, I'd almost be surprised if he makes it to 1.

Couldn't watch the press conference live but it sounds like he didn't explicitly deny some big stuff? Like was his campaign working with the Kremlin?? That's a pretty emphatic "FOCK NO!" if it's not at all true.

#77 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 11,810 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 12:16 PM

 

You expect something different from a totalitarian with a god complex?

 

As opposed to the corrupt, sell access to the country via State Dept, lying, miserable b!tch that got some of your countrymen killed? I'll take Trump ANYDAY over her.


BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#78 IGotWorms

IGotWorms

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 48,182 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 12:17 PM

 
http://www.fftodayfo...=461987&page=17
 
They DID run with it yesterday and I posted it. What they didn't do was run with ALL the details but they ran with the story all the same. Seems cut and dry to those actually listening and reading.
 
:doh:  


They ran with the story THAT TRUMP HAD BEEN BRIEFED ON IT.

That's focking true, is it not??? :doh:

Holy God, some of you guys have really, REALLY got to smarten up.

#79 Sho Nuff

Sho Nuff

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 49,750 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 12:25 PM

They ran with the story THAT TRUMP HAD BEEN BRIEFED ON IT.

That's focking true, is it not??? :doh:

Holy God, some of you guys have really, REALLY got to smarten up.


Guy has become the biggest hack here...big accomplishment too.

#80 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 11,810 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 12:25 PM

They ran with the story THAT TRUMP HAD BEEN BRIEFED ON IT.

That's focking true, is it not??? :doh:

Holy God, some of you guys have really, REALLY got to smarten up.

 

AND in that story they ran with most of the details of it soooooooooooo they ran with a story they couldn't substantiate.  :rolleyes:

 

Busload of Full Tilt Retahds here    :lol:


BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.