wiffleball 4,617 Posted January 22, 2019 Huh? Also, Rudy references his conversation with Trump And then immediately back tracks and says no that was just a hypothetical there was no conversation. But if there was, it wouldn't be illegal! God, this guy is so fos, I would rather let Joe pesci represent me in court. Worst lawyer ever. https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/2019/01/22/giuliani-says-tapes-prove-trumps-innocence-then-says-there-are-no-tapes/amp/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted January 22, 2019 Huh? Also, Rudy references his conversation with Trump And then immediately back tracks and says no that was just a hypothetical there was no conversation. But if there was, it wouldn't be illegal! God, this guy is so fos, I would rather let Joe pesci represent me in court. Worst lawyer ever. https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/2019/01/22/giuliani-says-tapes-prove-trumps-innocence-then-says-there-are-no-tapes/amp/ If true..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 824 Posted January 22, 2019 Rudolpho does a great job of muddying the waters so much that nobody can make sense of anything. It's a viable tactic. Expect to see more of it as things progress. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 3,939 Posted January 23, 2019 Huh? Also, Rudy references his conversation with Trump And then immediately back tracks and says no that was just a hypothetical there was no conversation. But if there was, it wouldn't be illegal! God, this guy is so fos, I would rather let Joe pesci represent me in court. Worst lawyer ever. https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/2019/01/22/giuliani-says-tapes-prove-trumps-innocence-then-says-there-are-no-tapes/amp/ I said it after his "I never said there was no collusion" meltdown, Rudy is going to plead insanity for himself. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DonS 3,050 Posted January 23, 2019 Wookie defense coming up? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites