KRK 0 Posted August 3, 2016 Which two would you keep. I am leaning towards Bell and Langford. Le’veon Bell 2nd Langford 9thJosh Gordon 13thWinston 11thChris Thompson 15thJordon Matthews 3rdJordon Reed 15thJeremy Hill 7th Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rholio 339 Posted August 3, 2016 Reed Hill Langford Gordon Winston Bell In order of preference. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
polecatt 401 Posted August 5, 2016 Which two would you keep. I am leaning towards Bell and Langford. Le’veon Bell 2nd Langford 9th Josh Gordon 13th Winston 11th Chris Thompson 15th Jordon Matthews 3rd Jordon Reed 15th Jeremy Hill 7th You would get a huge boost in week 5 if you took Bell and Gordon. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
scottybo 0 Posted August 6, 2016 I think i would agree with your two, bell and langford. it would be between Bell, Langford, Hill and Gordon for me. They all have question marks around them and so i think you need to go with the safer options. Bell, we know is a stud when healthy. Langford proven he can be really good with no forte in the mix. Hill is a TD machine but Benard is really solid and gordon is a headcase. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=456148 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
coachk424 0 Posted August 8, 2016 Langford and Reed for value. Bell & Gordon for risk/reward/upside. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
