rrmcguire 36 Posted October 19, 2017 Backs would be Demarco Murray Tevin Coleman Kamara Mack Receivers are Antonio Brown Hopkins John Brown Doctson Or can drop TE Henry or Safarian Jenkins Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgcrawfish 232 Posted October 19, 2017 heard Berry on his podcast talking about Davis. He was saying that he expects a good 2nd half for him. Might be worth a flyer because pickin's are getting slim. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rrmcguire 36 Posted October 19, 2017 Would you cut bait on McFadden or one of the tight ends Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
murf74 461 Posted October 19, 2017 I would keep those TE for sure They are like gold this year Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 2,452 Posted October 19, 2017 Mm this is a good question. I would keep McFadden and drop Doctson Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slim Pickins 0 Posted October 19, 2017 heard Berry on his podcast talking about Davis. He was saying that he expects a good 2nd half for him. Might be worth a flyer because pickin's are getting slim. Heh. Mm this is a good question.I would keep McFadden and drop Doctson What he said. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rrmcguire 36 Posted October 19, 2017 god....I hate to drop Doctson in case he goes off, but I really wouldn't play him over AB or Hopkins after this week, comes to down to who has the higher ceiling in Doctson vs Corey Davis, or if I drop either ASJ or Henry Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Challenger 72 Posted October 19, 2017 Corey is THE WR, if he can get on the field that is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jimaveli 119 Posted October 19, 2017 Keep both tight ends. Top 5-ish tight ends are tough to come by this year. Don't let one of your league mates get one for free! Doctson is your flyer wr spot. It just depends on which one you believe in more. Watch Josh this week and decide from there. They're giving him the 'we want to get him more involved' storyline right now. We'll see! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Challenger 72 Posted October 19, 2017 Keep both tight ends. Top 5-ish tight ends are tough to come by this year. Don't let one of your league mates get one for free! Doctson is your flyer wr spot. It just depends on which one you believe in more. Watch Josh this week and decide from there. They're giving him the 'we want to get him more involved' storyline right now. We'll see! I find it funny actually, it was give Crowder more involved just last week. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpenceToons 70 Posted October 19, 2017 None of the WAS receivers have registered anything appreciable on the fantasy relevance meter this year. The FFToday standard scoring pages show their highest WR for the season as Ryan Grant at the WR62. We expected more from Pryor, Crowder & company. So something may be wrong with the Redskins system and one might be advised to not hold much confidence that Doctson can shine in it either. TEN's done a little better with Rishard Matthews as the WR29 (I should note that TEN has had 6 games so far but WAS only 5) and Decker looks to be coming on. The Titans may utilize Davis more effectively than the Redskins will utilize Doctson. [Edit: I didn't take Chris Thompson into account when assessing WAS. The portion of his production from receiving would make him the WR22. Fwiw, Vernon Davis would be the WR58] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rrmcguire 36 Posted October 19, 2017 just dropped Doctson for Davis, figured he'd never play over AB or Dhop anyway and the updside of Davis paired with those two looks to be better than Doctson at least ROS Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TennisMenace 156 Posted October 19, 2017 just dropped Doctson for Davis, figured he'd never play over AB or Dhop anyway and the updside of Davis paired with those two looks to be better than Doctson at least ROS Davis should be back week 9 so if you weren’t going to play Josh in weeks 7 and 8, then drop him makes sense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Football Guru 210 Posted October 20, 2017 None of the WAS receivers have registered anything appreciable on the fantasy relevance meter this year. The FFToday standard scoring pages show their highest WR for the season as Ryan Grant at the WR62. We expected more from Pryor, Crowder & company. So something may be wrong with the Redskins system and one might be advised to not hold much confidence that Doctson can shine in it either. TEN's done a little better with Rishard Matthews as the WR29 (I should note that TEN has had 6 games so far but WAS only 5) and Decker looks to be coming on. The Titans may utilize Davis more effectively than the Redskins will utilize Doctson. [Edit: I didn't take Chris Thompson into account when assessing WAS. The portion of his production from receiving would make him the WR22. Fwiw, Vernon Davis would be the WR58] I just did a bit of research in response to an e-mailer's question. The following is paraphrasing what I wrote him. I think it goes a long way in explaining the problems owners are having regarding Washington receivers: Since the opener, no Redskin has attracted more than seven targets (both times, it was Chris Thompson with seven). I frankly cannot remember ever seeing a team go four straight games without giving at least one player more than seven targets. FWIW, seven targets is my cutoff as far as what typically separates average fantasy WRs from the higher-end ones. For the most part, receivers cannot consistently thrive unless they are getting more than seven targets. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
$epphori$ 118 Posted October 20, 2017 I just did a bit of research in response to an e-mailer's question. The following is paraphrasing what I wrote him. I think it goes a long way in explaining the problems owners are having regarding Washington receivers: Since the opener, no Redskin has attracted more than seven targets (both times, it was Chris Thompson with seven). I frankly cannot remember ever seeing a team go four straight games without giving at least one player more than seven targets. FWIW, seven targets is my cutoff as far as what typically separates average fantasy WRs from the higher-end ones. For the most part, receivers cannot consistently thrive unless they are getting more than seven targets. why dont they fire that OC? he took a top 5 passing offense and ruined it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maulers1973 117 Posted October 20, 2017 why dont they fire that OC? he took a top 5 passing offense and ruined it Mostly because they can't rehire Sean McVay. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Football Guru 210 Posted October 20, 2017 why dont they fire that OC? he took a top 5 passing offense and ruined it Head coaches usually don't fire themselves. Gruden took back the play-calling after McVay left. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
