Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
wiffleball

Comey testifies to House Intel Cmte

Recommended Posts

1 day later.. Yup, our bad... Surveillance of Trump did happen and was collected... Oh, and another thing, the information was also widely disbursed..

 

:doh:

 

Clown Show.

 

See post above...surveillance was of others...Trump people maybe caught again talking to other people under surveillance.

 

Clown show is right...this administration is a complete clown show.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 day later.. Yup, our bad... Surveillance of Trump did happen and was collected... Oh, and another thing, the information was also widely disbursed..

 

:doh:

 

Clown Show.

 

1 day later.....and people still can't differentiate between Trump being on tape because he called Russian Spooks that were under surveillance vs Trump himself being under surveillance. Even Devin Nunes is starting to see the difference when he was bought and paid to purposely not see said difference.

 

But maybe tomorrow people will understand better. If not then, Friday.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1 day later.....and people still can't differentiate between Trump being on tape because he called Russian Spooks that were under surveillance vs Trump himself being under surveillance. Even Devin Nunes is starting to see the difference when he was bought and paid to purposely not see said difference.

 

But maybe tomorrow people will understand better. If not then, Friday.

 

Meh, we all get the difference bubba. Just enjoying the ride.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Meh, we all get the difference bubba.

 

I'm actually not convinced many of you do.

 

But if I'm wrong, it'll be apparent as the thread continues, and I'll admit as much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I'm actually not convinced many of you do.

 

But if I'm wrong, it'll be apparent as the thread continues, and I'll admit as much.

 

I bet many don't care what you're convinced of.

 

:dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nunes informs Ryan but not Schiff?

Was a member of Trump transition team....guy needs to go before he ends up getting charged with obstruction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lintards were celebrating like the Falcons at halftime. Lol

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

There is the spin already.

Nope...someone else was wiretapped...did you read the string where it says his people were supposedly caught inadvertantly...meaning they were again talking with someone else who was being watched?

 

You should try harder.

Sure it was someone else.....after all, shouldn't we trust the fockers who told us all along there was no wiretapping?

 

This house of cards is coming down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

This house of cards is coming down.

Now that's the truth

 

Did you even listen? Nunes himself said all legal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So.......how many FISA requests were submitted? Guess they used the shotgun approach (this one wasn't Russian) to ensure they got who they wanted namely Trump.

 

We now know why Obama pressed for the wide dissemination of information between 16 agencies. Harder to tell where leaks are coming from and smear as much sh!t on the walls as he could.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So.......how many FISA requests were submitted? Guess they used the shotgun approach (this one wasn't Russian) to ensure they got who they wanted namely Trump.

 

We now know why Obama pressed for the wide dissemination of information between 16 agencies. Harder to tell where leaks are coming from and smear as much sh!t on the walls as he could.

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that's the truth

 

Did you even listen? Nunes himself said all legal

Legal on the interception of it however it seems the previous administration wanted that intel bad....3 FISA requests and counting. I'm not sure about the disemination of that stuff being legal though.

 

But you just keep trusting the people who have to explain why their story is 'technically' not a lie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So.......how many FISA requests were submitted? Guess they used the shotgun approach (this one wasn't Russian) to ensure they got who they wanted namely Trump.

 

We now know why Obama pressed for the wide dissemination of information between 16 agencies. Harder to tell where leaks are coming from and smear as much sh!t on the walls as he could.

Do you think the libtards around here can offer up any kind of explinaton as to why all of a sudden Obama loosened up the dissemination of info in his last weeks in office? No, they can't. That's the number one indicator that Obama was employing subterfuge against Trump, and in effect, the American people.
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think the libtards around here can offer up any kind of explinaton as to why all of a sudden Obama loosened up the dissemination of info in his last weeks in office? No, they can't. That's the number one indicator that Obama was employing subterfuge against Trump, and in effect, the American people.

Moles everywhere and it will take years to get rid of them all.

 

Trump needs to undo that order a.s.a.p.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Moles everywhere and it will take years to get rid of them all.

 

Trump needs to undo that order a.s.a.p.

Yes. But I would love to hear the reason why it was done, in the waning days of his presidency. Our libtards around here are puzzies, so I doubt any of them will tackle that question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. But I would love to hear the reason why it was done, in the waning days of his presidency. Our libtards around here are puzzies, so I doubt any of them will tackle that question.

No, you're a puzzy

 

Bam! Kapow! Owned!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure it was someone else.....after all, shouldn't we trust the fockers who told us all along there was no wiretapping?

 

This house of cards is coming down.

Focking Nunes himself says that...and the guy is a Trump guy.

 

Fock are you really that dumb?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So.......how many FISA requests were submitted? Guess they used the shotgun approach (this one wasn't Russian) to ensure they got who they wanted namely Trump.

 

We now know why Obama pressed for the wide dissemination of information between 16 agencies. Harder to tell where leaks are coming from and smear as much sh!t on the walls as he could.

Well today's leaks came from Nunes...I guess we should lock him up right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone who actually types that sentence structure is questioning someone else's intelligence? :)

 

No I think he confirmed who the stupid people in this country are. They are the people that America since Obama's first midterm have been telling we don't agree with your political views and bouncing them out of office left and right.

You call out someone's grammar in the same post you throw out that absolute word salad piece of garbage sentence?

 

Lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Filthy and RP in fullin spin mode just like Spicer

Yeah, odd that one of them gets a bee in their Bonnet and the other one starts spouting about it, isn't it?

 

But hey, at least they're both equally wrong and misinformed when they do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well today's leaks came from Nunes...I guess we should lock him up right?

 

Leaks about incidental contact where names were not redacted and personal communications were intercepted? Tell us how this has ANYTHING to do with the ACTIVE investigation that Schiff is leaking stuff?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, odd that one of them gets a bee in their Bonnet and the other one starts spouting about it, isn't it?

 

But hey, at least they're both equally wrong and misinformed when they do.

 

Why did Obama broaden this dissemination of information so every one of the 16 Intell agencies could view it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Why did Obama broaden this dissemination of information so every one of the 16 Intell agencies could view it?

It's so adorable when you and Troubadouche both spout the same nonsense. Cheetoh Von Tweeto is going down and your desperation is showing. :wave:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's so adorable when you and Troubadouche both spout the same nonsense. Cheetoh Von Tweeto is going down and your desperation is showing. :wave:

 

Poor meathead waiting patiently for some talking points from the other spice girls.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Poor meathead waiting patiently for some talking points from the other spice girls.

Exactly. I didn't think for a minute that idiot woukd attempt to answer the question by himself. Hell, the ones that post every minute of the day won't go near it. Hacks all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"And I'll tell you, NSA is being cooperative," Nunes continued, "but so far the FBI has not told us whether or not they’re going to respond to our March 15th letter, which is now a couple of weeks old.”

Nunes also reported that as of now, he "cannot rule out" President Obama ordering the surveillance.

 

https://news.grabien.com/story-nunes-fbi-not-cooperating-our-investigation-trump-camp-surve

 

Guess we know why the left wants Nunes gone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Leaks about incidental contact where names were not redacted and personal communications were intercepted? Tell us how this has ANYTHING to do with the ACTIVE investigation that Schiff is leaking stuff?

I'll ask again...what evidence has Schiff leaked?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Why did Obama broaden this dissemination of information so every one of the 16 Intell agencies could view it?

Why wouldn't they be able to share such information?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"And I'll tell you, NSA is being cooperative," Nunes continued, "but so far the FBI has not told us whether or not theyre going to respond to our March 15th letter, which is now a couple of weeks old.

Nunes also reported that as of now, he "cannot rule out" President Obama ordering the surveillance.

 

https://news.grabien.com/story-nunes-fbi-not-cooperating-our-investigation-trump-camp-surve

 

Guess we know why the left wants Nunes gone.

Copy and pasted 3 times...thanks Phurfur

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll ask again...what evidence has Schiff leaked?

 

Details of evidence in an active investigation. :doh:

 

Why wouldn't they be able to share such information?

 

Broadening a 'need to know' of information they shouldn't be privy to. Why would he feel compelled to do that shortly before he left office?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Details of evidence in an active investigation. :doh:

 

 

Broadening a 'need to know' of information they shouldn't be privy to. Why would he feel compelled to do that shortly before he left office?

So nothing more than saying it is more than circumstantial...and you think that is bad and worse than what Nunes pulled. Thanks for again proving you are a partisan hack.

 

Shouldn't be privy to? Again...I disagree. Better head back to the treehouse or one of those pundit sites to get your next talking point or thing that you know nothing about yet want to whine about Obummer to deflect from the awful last two days for Trump.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Copy and pasted 3 times...thanks Phurfur

Hey Biff how did your meeeting withBill Oliver go? I hope you didn't steal his pen!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Avoid commenting on actual issue. thanks Meathead.

You want me to kick your ass in it in three threads?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

Broadening a 'need to know' of information they shouldn't be privy to. Why would he feel compelled to do that shortly before he left office?

One last great deed for his country. He knew democracy was in trouble and that Trump was teaming with our adversary to rig the election.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×