M. Wallace or Lafell

[Ryan1761 0]

Looking at which receiver going forward. I like Wallace better overall but I think Lafell has more upside and potential to score more points solely off of Brady throwing the ball. My lineup is in my sig. Also Jordy and Calvin are on bye's. I am hoping AJ is a go this week. If he was, would you dare start AJ and Sanu at the same time or roll Wallace/Lafell in the WR2 spot.

 

[barber2309 26]

Keep Wallace and go AJ and Wallace if AJ plays and Wallace and Sanu otherwise.

 

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=439741

[polecatt 402]

I would start AJ and Sanu if AJ is healthy no problem. Sanu has been money this year and AJ is AJ. One of them is almost certain to have a big game and the other will probably be on par with either of your other choices.

If you decide to go another route I would pick Wallace over LaFell. Wallace has been surprisingly consistent this year and is about always a solid flex play or even WR2. I know LaFell just had a huge game but don't expect that to happen very often he isn't consistent.

[weepaws 2,459]

Looking at which receiver going forward. I like Wallace better overall but I think Lafell has more upside and potential to score more points solely off of Brady throwing the ball. My lineup is in my sig. Also Jordy and Calvin are on bye's. I am hoping AJ is a go this week. If he was, would you dare start AJ and Sanu at the same time or roll Wallace/Lafell in the WR2 spot.

 

No reason to drop Wallace . And the upside from these two will change week to week

[jzadroga 5]

The AJ situation is still unclear, but I would play him if he goes. If not go with Sanu. I also like Wallace, he has been steady all season and no reason to think that won't continue. Lafell has looked good lately, but that NE WR situation is tough to read week to week. You can also try posting your matchup questions here and people will vote on them to help you decide too. Good luck!