Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Mike Honcho

Woman in 14-Year Coma Gives Birth in Arizona

Recommended Posts

So does this qualify as rape? She did not consent, nor could she....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't refuse.

 

Right. I am sure there is a lawyer out there who can argue to defend this clown. :thumbsdown:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How the hell did this idiot sit around waiting for the results to come back?

 

I think my ass would be looking for nursing Jobs in non extradition countries.

 

Maybe he knows that a bunch of staff were focking it, and rolled the dice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I don't understand is it is incredibly hard to flock a woman when she's got a catheter in.

 

 

 

 

...um, I've heard...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How the hell did this idiot sit around waiting for the results to come back?

I think my ass would be looking for nursing Jobs in non extradition countries.

Maybe he knows that a bunch of staff were focking it, and rolled the dice.

Possible, but that’s not the kind of thing you share with a group. It’s best as your own little secret.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't refuse.

 

Well, if a drunk girl can give consent and still have a case for rape after she sobered up, you don't have to NOT refuse.

 

https://www.stsm.org/myths-and-facts-about-sexual-assault-and-consent

 

"Myth: If the assailant, victim, or both are under the influence of drugs or alcohol, the victim is free to consent to sex and the assailant therefore cannot be charged with rape.

Fact: When intoxicated, an individual cannot legally consent to sexual activity. Forcing sex on someone who is too drunk to give consent is still Criminal Sexual Conduct in the Third Degree. Rape is a serious offense, and people who commit crimes while under the influence of alcohol or drugs are not considered free from guilt."

 

I would assume that the prosecution in the case can apply this standard and get a rape charge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How the hell did this idiot sit around waiting for the results to come back?

 

I think my ass would be looking for nursing Jobs in non extradition countries.

 

Maybe he knows that a bunch of staff were focking it, and rolled the dice.

 

I honestly wouldn't be surprised.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The cops took one look at him and said. We'll check this guy first.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Well, if a drunk girl can give consent and still have a case for rape after she sobered up, you don't have to NOT refuse.

 

https://www.stsm.org/myths-and-facts-about-sexual-assault-and-consent

 

"Myth: If the assailant, victim, or both are under the influence of drugs or alcohol, the victim is free to consent to sex and the assailant therefore cannot be charged with rape.

Fact: When intoxicated, an individual cannot legally consent to sexual activity. Forcing sex on someone who is too drunk to give consent is still Criminal Sexual Conduct in the Third Degree. Rape is a serious offense, and people who commit crimes while under the influence of alcohol or drugs are not considered free from guilt."

 

I would assume that the prosecution in the case can apply this standard and get a rape charge.

Actually, this is part of what pisses me off. So wait a minute, a woman can be too drunk to consent and knowingly understand what she's doing? But a guy can never be too drunk to not be held responsible?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, this is part of what pisses me off. So wait a minute, a woman can be too drunk to consent and knowingly understand what she's doing? But a guy can never be too drunk to not be held responsible?

 

Correct.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Well, if a drunk girl can give consent and still have a case for rape after she sobered up, you don't have to NOT refuse.

 

I would assume that the prosecution in the case can apply this standard and get a rape charge.

so, if I understand your point, you're saying somebody got this vegetable chick drunk?

 

 

 

Man, that's a waste of some wine coolers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No shock when I saw the perp.

he had one eye on her and one on the door :banana:
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, this is part of what pisses me off. So wait a minute, a woman can be too drunk to consent and knowingly understand what she's doing? But a guy can never be too drunk to not be held responsible?

 

In all fairness, the prosecution uses the Whiskey-D!ck provision - If you are not so hammered that you can get it up, then you are responsible for your actions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

he had one eye on her and one on the door :banana:

Nice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gurgle gurgle ... uhhhh.

I member

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So does this qualify as rape? She did not consent, nor could she....

It's sexual assault legally there is a difference

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so, if I understand your point, you're saying somebody got this vegetable chick drunk?

 

 

 

Man, that's a waste of some wine coolers.

 

If he were smart, he stole it from the nurses station. Wait a minute... I said "if he were smart". Duh, what was I thinking!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can’t say I blame the guy. There’s only so many days I can see a 5 dollar bill layin on the ground and not pick it up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Damn...was hoping it wasn't the obvious. :thumbsdown:

He probably says he's an Indian. You guys are off the hook.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rofl laughing...he probably hung around because he wasnt the only one. They were running a train on that. Should have done it maury povich style.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rofl laughing...he probably hung around because he wasnt the only one. They were running a train on that.

 

Sadly, I think you're right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rofl laughing...he probably hung around because he wasnt the only one. They were running a train on that. Should have done it maury povich style.

Never thought about that there is a good chance this true.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now, I haven't really read anything about this, but has the MSM mentioned the guys race? They only do that when the person is white it seems... or they'll mention the person's race if they're openly conservative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If he knew she was pregs, why didn't he self abort? She wouldn't feel it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If he knew she was pregs, why didn't he self abort? She wouldn't feel it

The nurse working the day shift probably would've noticed the coat hangar sticking out of her snatch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×