Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
edjr

Russell Brand backhands Bill Maher on his own show

Recommended Posts

Meh.

 

They're battling over two different brands (pun intended) which offer the same flavor. Both sides are decrying that voters should be able to vote for things which involve taking money out of the pockets of other people.

 

Trump's voters support putting that money back, regardless of the imperfection of the POTUS himself; regardless the institutional establishment of entitlements which is going to take revolution to truly reverse.

 

This is about collectivism/redistributionism versus rebuilding individualism. In the same sense, it is about retaining US sovereignty - individualism - versus globalist 'redistributionism'.

 

There is no real opposition. Brand is clearly hyper intelligent; by far the most intelligent person on that panel. But that panel was all speaking the same collectivist language.

 

It, though, turns on itself...just as Hillary's entrenched political interests manifested themselves within the DNC to railroad Bernie out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I enjoy Maher, but I'm fascinated by his belief that Hillary beat Sanders fair and square. Is he unaware of the superdelegate process which rammed Hillary down our throats?

 

Brand seems to be saying "stop with this 'if only Hillary were president' crap, she is a shill as well, give us some real candidates." :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I enjoy Maher, but I'm fascinated by his belief that Hillary beat Sanders fair and square. Is he unaware of the superdelegate process which rammed Hillary down our throats?

 

Brand seems to be saying "stop with this 'if only Hillary were president' crap, she is a shill as well, give us some real candidates." :thumbsup:

I sure wish Sanders had won, but is there something I'm missing? IIRC Hillary had an edge on the elected delegates so super delegates didn't end up deciding it -- thankfully.

 

The reason she won the primary was the black vote, especially in the south.

 

Now the DNC certainly didn't help and they can go fock themselves. But again it does not seem that was the determining factor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I sure wish Sanders had won, but is there something I'm missing? IIRC Hillary had an edge on the elected delegates so super delegates didn't end up deciding it -- thankfully.

 

The reason she won the primary was the black vote, especially in the south.

 

Now the DNC certainly didn't help and they can go fock themselves. But again it does not seem that was the determining factor.

You could argue the superdelegate advantage disenfranchised Bernie voters enough or the DNC's actively supporting Hillary was enough to put her over the top.

 

But the RNC was also supporting anyone but Trump, and that wasn't enough to bury him. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could argue the superdelegate advantage disenfranchised Bernie voters enough or the DNC's actively supporting Hillary was enough to put her over the top.

 

But the RNC was also supporting anyone but Trump, and that wasn't enough to bury him. :dunno:

I guess you could argue but it isn't very compelling. And I'd be the first one b1tching if it was some inside job, especially considering what an awful focking candidate Hillary was.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank god it's not sanders

 

:doublethumbsup:

 

America doesn't deserve a president that actually believes and does what he says. A guy that actually wants to restore the middle class. We deserve a bunch of rich a-holes pitting us against one another, while they steal our money and hand it over to whatever special interests are running the show behind the curtain.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

:doublethumbsup:

 

America doesn't deserve a president that actually believes and does what he says. A guy that actually wants to restore the middle class. We deserve a bunch of rich a-holes pitting us against one another, while they steal our money and hand it over to whatever special interests are running the show behind the curtain.

 

stop

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

:doublethumbsup:

 

America doesn't deserve a president that actually believes and does what he says. A guy that actually wants to restore the middle class. We deserve a bunch of rich a-holes pitting us against one another, while they steal our money and hand it over to whatever special interests are running the show behind the curtain.

he's filthy rich

 

HtH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Russell Brand is in direct competition with Tom Green for the Most Unfunny FotherMocker ever.

 

I mean, I get that humor is subjective, but with these two? Geesus, all humor at least has some kind of baseline where you can go "Well, I don't find that funny, but I see what's he's doing there."

 

These two just suck, but I give extra shiit points to Brand for being even more annoying.

 

And Frankly - At this point, I would vote for a Travel Ban that Excludes any focking Limey (Scot, Canadian, Australian too - Anything under the British Thumb) from coming over here - biitching about how focked up we are - and then instantly applying for citizenship because their countries are such raging bags of shiit. (or, shiite)

 

Fock him. Fock them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could argue the superdelegate advantage disenfranchised Bernie voters enough or the DNC's actively supporting Hillary was enough to put her over the top.

 

But the RNC was also supporting anyone but Trump, and that wasn't enough to bury him. :dunno:

Since major elements of the RNC were the target of Trump - and his supporters, by direct extension - it very likely helped Trump to have GOP voters perceive that the RNC wanted anyone but.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:doublethumbsup:

 

America doesn't deserve a president that actually believes and does what he says. A guy that actually wants to restore the middle class. We deserve a bunch of rich a-holes pitting us against one another, while they steal our money and hand it over to whatever special interests are running the show behind the curtain.

Bernie believes what he says, you say?

 

Is that why he's got three houses now, and a wife under investigation for corruption? Because he believes what he says?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

:doublethumbsup:

 

America doesn't deserve a president that actually believes and does what he says. A guy that actually wants to restore the middle class. We deserve a bunch of rich a-holes pitting us against one another, while they steal our money and hand it over to whatever special interests are running the show behind the curtain.

 

can't tell if serious

 

:dunno:

 

Bernie doesn't want to restore the middle class, he wants socialism and government controlled business, he thinks college is a human right and should be free gimme a break

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

:doublethumbsup:

 

America doesn't deserve a president that actually believes and does what he says. A guy that actually wants to restore the middle class. We deserve a bunch of rich a-holes pitting us against one another, while they steal our money and hand it over to whatever special interests are running the show behind the curtain.

:lol: :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bernie believes what he says, you say?

 

Is that why he's got three houses now, and a wife under investigation for corruption? Because he believes what he says?

Political hit job to discredit him, most likely. I don't think most people are buying it but they'll trot it back out in 2020 if he runs again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Political hit job to discredit him, most likely. I don't think most people are buying it but they'll trot it back out in 2020 if he runs again

How old would he be? Just googled, he'll be 80, no way he runs again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How old would he be? Just googled, he'll be 80, no way he runs again

Seems unlikely, but he's acting like he might run again, keeping his name and face out there and all. I suspect he just wants to have a say in who the nominee is (via endorsement and donor lists)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems unlikely, but he's acting like he might run again, keeping his name and face out there and all. I suspect he just wants to have a say in who the nominee is (via endorsement and donor lists)

That makes sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×