On phone now. But tonight I can't wait to post Shepard Smith's take down of the whole nuclear deal b*******.
You guys don't get even know how easily you're being played? It's just counter distraction at this point.
But beyond that, most of you trolls were the one saying there was absolutely no contact with the Russians because that's what Trump Co told you to say. And now after 37 different reluctant admissions that there were indeed contact with the Russians, suddenly now it's 'well what's the big deal with contacting the Russians?'
I mean, how many times do you have to have different people say I had no contact with the Russians? Then it's proven otherwise then it's, oh I forgot about that one. Then it's proven there are five others, oh I forgot about those 5 too...
It's okay to get mad at them and tell them to least come clean the first time when they get busted.
But what about ..... ????
Why don't you go ahead and try to start your fire on this cold bucket of water I'm going to throw on your attempt first?https://townhall.com...or-not-n2409862
Not one word in that story is something which contradicts what I have believed about the Clinton's corruption wrt UraniumOne. Fact: if this isn't influence-peddling (it is), with major stakes and US interests in the balance, why again did Bill Clinton lie about his associations and meetings?
Go ahead, wiffleball. Please explain to us exactly which words in the above dissection of the "giddy" liberal attempt to use Shepard Smith's characterization of the UraniumOne story you disagree with.
Exactly and precisely. I need to know exactly what part of what is described above makes you think this is a non-story "distraction".
Because facts indicate otherwise, regardless how much you attempt to torture certain facts.