Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Mungwater

Austin package bombs

Recommended Posts

Black Muslim in late 40's on welfare and here illegally.

nah, just another millenial loser.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't they catch Teddy by way of a relative tipping the authorities off? I fear they will not catch this priick unless something similar happens.

Good call

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For a moment I had thought maybe wiff moved back to Texas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

White male. They got that out there as fast as they could.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a great thing because of the crimes he committed. But we should all be a little concerned how easily our privacy is given away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait till the Press finds out that it was actually Matt Damon.

 

Dude has been delivering bomb after bomb lately.

 

 

Amirite?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait till the Press finds out that it was actually Matt Damon.

 

Dude has been delivering bomb after bomb lately.

 

 

Amirite?

Does Australia play nice when it comes to extradition?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Black Muslim in late 40's on welfare and here illegally.

Nah something like this is well thought out and planned.

 

50s white guy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonder what odd looking teenagers the news can exploit for the anti-bomb crowd

Because the news only exploits the anti crowd?

 

But damn...this guy did target those bomb free zones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually - sounds like he's a staunch Conservative.

 

There are few traces of a social media presence aside from a blog with six posts all from 2012.........

The short posts riff in support of the death penalty and oppose gay marriage, abortions and sex offender registration lists.

It really does not matter, crazy is crazy regardless of political beliefs.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonder what odd looking teenagers the news can exploit for the anti-bomb crowd

wasn't that little turd CNN rep Hogg sugggesting ways at getting back at fedex for supporting the NRA?

Maybe there's a connection.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually - sounds like he's a staunch Conservative.

 

There are few traces of a social media presence aside from a blog with six posts all from 2012.........

The short posts riff in support of the death penalty and oppose gay marriage, abortions and sex offender registration lists.

2012. What was he, 16? Come on man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Suspected bomber dead. :banana:

Nah- this was the real target- the others were just to throw off authorities and confuse everyone.

 

Now the real bomber will just slink away

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wasn't that little turd CNN rep Hogg sugggesting ways at getting back at fedex for supporting the NRA?

Maybe there's a connection.

Dumb...even for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually - sounds like he's a staunch Conservative.

 

There are few traces of a social media presence aside from a blog with six posts all from 2012.........

The short posts riff in support of the death penalty and oppose gay marriage, abortions and sex offender registration lists.

Time for the Hannity crowd.

 

They use bombs to cover the faces because these guys look exactly like the so-called victims from Sandy Hook. Sure, they might have said they were 6 years old, but I bet they were midgets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Time for the Hannity crowd.

 

They use bombs to cover the faces because these guys look exactly like the so-called victims from Sandy Hook. Sure, they might have said they were 6 years old, but I bet they were midgets.

Whiff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2012. What was he, 16? Come on man.

So let me get this straight:

 

Declaring one a wacko liberal based on absolute nothing - that doesn't garner a "come on man".............but at least some form of validation of his views does - got it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So let me get this straight:

 

Declaring one a wacko liberal based on absolute nothing - that doesn't garner a "come on man".............but at least some form of validation of his views does - got it.

Playing the odds man. Drobeski has an incredible winning Pct.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Playing the odd man. Drobeski has an incredible winning Pct.

I forgot. He's the Nick Foles of the board. lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So let me get this straight:

 

Declaring one a wacko liberal based on absolute nothing - that doesn't garner a "come on man".............but at least some form of validation of his views does - got it.

Sums up the daily political banter here pretty nicely actually. If the source is pro conservative views it could be a nameless faceless homeless man in a psych ward. If its anti conservative the source needs 5 forms of ID, years of credibility, mothers maiden name and references dating back to the 60s.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sums up the daily political banter here pretty nicely actually. If the source is pro conservative views it could be a nameless faceless homeless man in a psych ward. If its anti conservative the source needs 5 forms of ID, years of credibility, mothers maiden name and references dating back to the 60s.

In this case, he was citing something a 15 year old possibly said 6 years ago on the internet. It deserves derision.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In this case, he was citing something a 15 year old possibly said 6 years ago on the internet. It deserves derision.

No, only because if the shoe was on the other foot and his 2012 social media said he was liberal you would be counting it as set in stone proof. Have to call a fair game here. Thats my point. Anti conservative arguments are met with further, smaller goalposts, whereas pro conservative views have the posts widened 50 feet for easy kicks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, only because if the shoe was on the other foot and his 2012 social media said he was liberal you would be counting it as set in stone proof. Have to call a fair game here.

Maybe on reflex, but if someone pointed out he was a kid when (if) he said it I would cede their point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So let me get this straight:

 

Declaring one a wacko liberal based on absolute nothing - that doesn't garner a "come on man".............but at least some form of validation of his views does - got it.

I saw he was a registered democrat before I posted it :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe on reflex, but if someone pointed out he was a kid when (if) he said it I would cede their point.

I’d say the jury is def still out and I won’t hold a 16yr old kid to his beliefs at that age. I’d let evidence of his current beliefs come out first. However leopards rarely change their spots.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

However leopards rarely change their spots.

If you ever watched Trailer Park Boys then that should read "Sh1t leopard". RIP Mr. Lahey. :cry:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sums up the daily political banter here pretty nicely actually. If the source is pro conservative views it could be a nameless faceless homeless man in a psych ward. If its anti conservative the source needs 5 forms of ID, years of credibility, mothers maiden name and references dating back to the 60s.

😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.towleroad.com/2018/03/mark-anthony-conditt/

 

Austin Terrorist Mark Anthony Conditt Attacked Gays, Abortion in Blog Posts Defining Conservative Stance

That's from six years ago? Or is that new?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's from six years ago? Or is that new?

My bad, I misread and thought these were new but thats the already known blog posts from 2012. Id like to say they will dig up newer stuff but most likely they will just run with that old stuff since it makes better clickbait.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My bad, I misread and thought these were new but thats the already known blog posts from 2012.

No sweat. Hey, he could have become even more hard right over the years for all we know. I'm sure it will all come out. Scary stuff though, what's going on with young men in this country.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×