Examples of voter fraud, you know the problem that doesn't exist.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,631]

Varies by state. But let me dumb this down for you. If you don't vote fraudulently it's not voter fraud. If there are 1000 people who died or moved On the voter rolls and nobody votes under any of those thousand names, it is not voter fraud. Yet we've got Trumpets running all over the place saying there are thousands of cases of voter fraud!

 

It's really not that ###### hard.

Why are you so nasty all the time?

[RaiderHaters Revenge 3,579]

Why are you so nasty all the time?

 

its the internet, people can continue to be douchy with no repercussions

[Baker Boy 1,485]

Study supports Trump: 5.7 million noncitizens may have cast illegal votes

 

A research group in New Jersey has taken a fresh look at postelection polling data and concluded that the number of noncitizens voting illegally in U.S. elections is likely far greater than previous estimates.

As many as 5.7 million noncitizens may have voted in the 2008 election, which put Barack Obama in the White House.

.

For 2012, Just Facts said, 3.2 million to 5.6 million noncitizens were registered to vote and 1.2 million to 3.6 million of them voted.

 

 

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/19/noncitizen-illegal-vote-number-higher-than-estimat/

[Hardcore troubadour 12,631]

Wow. Looks like Trump is right again. The guys like a bloodhound.

[giraldi02 470]

Except for the fact that the very people that did the survey (Harvard, not Just Facts) warned against cherry picking data from their survey due to the fact that the number of non-citizens in their study was such a low percentage that it can't be automatically applicable to the entire voting public.

 

This is the very same problem with polling...the thing that so many here seem to say isn't reliable.

https://cces.gov.harvard.edu/news/perils-cherry-picking-low-frequency-events-large-sample-surveys

[Baker Boy 1,485]

Except for the fact that the very people that did the survey (Harvard, not Just Facts) warned against cherry picking data from their survey due to the fact that the number of non-citizens in their study was such a low percentage that it can't be automatically applicable to the entire voting public.

 

This is the very same problem with polling...the thing that so many here seem to say isn't reliable.

https://cces.gov.harvard.edu/news/perils-cherry-picking-low-frequency-events-large-sample-surveys

Well that is true of every study. Why don't we end them?

 

MMGW is basing its facts on 100 years of data on a 5 billion year old planet.

 

It is much more accurate than saying fraud isnt that bad without conducting a study a study.

[giraldi02 470]

Well that is true of every study. Why don't we end them?

 

MMGW is basing its facts on 100 years of data on a 5 billion year old planet.

 

It is much more accurate than saying fraud isnt that bad without conducting a study a study.

 

100 years of data....

 

You should go back to your juice box and daytime cartoons.

 

Or just log out and sign back in as one of the other aliases

[Hardcore troubadour 12,631]

 

100 years of data....

 

You should go back to your juice box and daytime cartoons.

 

Or just log out and sign back in as one of the other aliases

Typical Libtard. When confronted with a differing viewpoint just hurl some unfunny insults. Sad.

[giraldi02 470]

Typical Libtard. When confronted with a differing viewpoint just hurl some unfunny insults. Sad.

Says the guy using the word Libtard to describe someone who is anything but.

 

It took you long enough to sign out and back in though.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,631]

Says the guy using the word Libtard to describe someone who is anything but.

 

It took you long enough to sign out and back in though.

They're coming to take me away ha ha, they're coming to take me away. Tin foil hats are so 6 months ago.

[Baker Boy 1,485]

100 years of data....

 

You should go back to your juice box and daytime cartoons.

 

Or just log out and sign back in as one of the other aliases

 

And they cherry picked that data!

 

How many years of data did they use because my point does not change?

 

What do you think, 1 billion?

[giraldi02 470]

It's sad when one person goes full tilt using multiple screen names.

 

Maybe another week of banishment is needed for his sanity

[Sho Nuff 719]

Except for the fact that the very people that did the survey (Harvard, not Just Facts) warned against cherry picking data from their survey due to the fact that the number of non-citizens in their study was such a low percentage that it can't be automatically applicable to the entire voting public.

 

This is the very same problem with polling...the thing that so many here seem to say isn't reliable.

 

https://cces.gov.harvard.edu/news/perils-cherry-picking-low-frequency-events-large-sample-surveys

 

You have to understand that the rightys here have a complete lack of understanding of statistics (comparing % of chance to win polls with national polling...presidential races and winning percentages to that of special elections for a local district seat...)

[RaiderHaters Revenge 3,579]

 

You have to understand that the rightys here have a complete lack of understanding of statistics (comparing % of chance to win polls with national polling...presidential races and winning percentages to that of special elections for a local district seat...)

 

You have to understand that the lefties here have a complete lack of winning, and just can't seem to understand why

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

While I don't believe in the extrapolated figures they're coming up with, there is obviously a problem there since they have illegals admitting they cast ballots.

 

Let's bring on the National Voter ID and make it mandatory to vote in National Elections.

[Baker Boy 1,485]

Election board lists more general election votes than voters in Chicago

 

More than 14,000 votes were cast in Chicago during the 2016 general election than there were voters to cast them, based on separate figures released by the Chicago Board of Elections

http://chicagocitywire.com/stories/511195461-election-board-lists-more-general-election-votes-than-voters-in-chicago

[RaiderHaters Revenge 3,579]

Election board lists more general election votes than voters in Chicago

 

More than 14,000 votes were cast in Chicago during the 2016 general election than there were voters to cast them, based on separate figures released by the Chicago Board of Elections

http://chicagocitywire.com/stories/511195461-election-board-lists-more-general-election-votes-than-voters-in-chicago

 

Racist Bigot

 

thats all they have

[giraldi02 470]

Election board lists more general election votes than voters in Chicago

 

More than 14,000 votes were cast in Chicago during the 2016 general election than there were voters to cast them, based on separate figures released by the Chicago Board of Elections

http://chicagocitywire.com/stories/511195461-election-board-lists-more-general-election-votes-than-voters-in-chicago

 

So you're using LGIS - local government information as a source and you complain about fake news?

 

You realize there is no such publication called Chicago City Wire. It's a spawn of a bunch of fake news websites. Next thing you'll do is post a link to the Sangamon Sun.

 

Oh, and the guy in charge of those websites, one Brian Timpone, was fired by the Chicago Tribune for "ethical breaches, including false bylines, plagiarism and fake quotations"

 

 

Nice attempt though.

[Sho Nuff 719]

So you're using LGIS - local government information as a source and you complain about fake news?

 

You realize there is no such publication called Chicago City Wire. It's a spawn of a bunch of fake news websites. Next thing you'll do is post a link to the Sangamon Sun.

 

Oh, and the guy in charge of those websites, one Brian Timpone, was fired by the Chicago Tribune for "ethical breaches, including false bylines, plagiarism and fake quotations"

 

 

Nice attempt though.

Nothing new from Baker...or the right. Those who complain most about fake news believe and spread more fake BS than anyone . They take after Trump that way.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

So you're using LGIS - local government information as a source and you complain about fake news?

 

You realize there is no such publication called Chicago City Wire. It's a spawn of a bunch of fake news websites. Next thing you'll do is post a link to the Sangamon Sun.

 

Oh, and the guy in charge of those websites, one Brian Timpone, was fired by the Chicago Tribune for "ethical breaches, including false bylines, plagiarism and fake quotations"

 

 

Nice attempt though.

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/09/05/chicago-reported-thousands-more-votes-than-voters-in-2016-gop-official-says.html

 

From Detroit:

 

http://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2016/12/12/records-many-votes-detroits-precincts/95363314/

 

Don't stoop to Slo's tactic of laughing off the whole story because of one source someone posts. You're better than that man.

[Sho Nuff 719]

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/09/05/chicago-reported-thousands-more-votes-than-voters-in-2016-gop-official-says.html

 

From Detroit:

 

http://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2016/12/12/records-many-votes-detroits-precincts/95363314/

 

Don't stoop to Slo's tactic of laughing off the whole story because of one source someone posts. You're better than that man.

Says the guy who whines about sources all the time.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Says the guy who whines about sources all the time.

 

You're projecting again. It's you that tries to discredit every story that isn't published by CNN or Buzzfeed.

[Sho Nuff 719]

 

You're projecting again. It's you that tries to discredit every story that isn't published by CNN or Buzzfeed.

Actually...your post here just proved me right.

Dumbass.

[Cdub100 3,380]

CNN = Very Fake News

[Sho Nuff 719]

CNN = Very Fake News

Liar

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Actually...your post here just proved me right.

Dumbass.

 

 

Try again sunshine. Me stating YOU discredit anything other than CNN or Buzzfeed isn't proving your point that I whine about sources.

[Cdub100 3,380]

Liar

 

That only works on actual liars, which is why it bothers you so much.

[Sho Nuff 719]

 

 

Try again sunshine. Me stating YOU discredit anything other than CNN or Buzzfeed isn't proving your point that I whine about sources.

You're whining about two sources I don't actually use.

Dipshit

[Sho Nuff 719]

 

That only works on actual liars, which is why it bothers you so much.

It never bothers me as you are always wrong in calling me a liar.

 

Your post about CNN was actually a lie.

 

HTH

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

You're whining about two sources I don't actually use.

Dipshit

 

 

You're going full retard. I'm not whining about sources jacka$$ but pointing out your lame tradition of throwing out the whole story because someone used a source not 'Slo-Nutt Certified'.

 

And you have used CNN before...........also you were all in on the Dossier when only Buzzfeed carried it.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,631]

 

 

You're going full retard. I'm not whining about sources jacka$$ but pointing out your lame tradition of throwing out the whole story because someone used a source not 'Slo-Nutt Certified'.

 

And you have used CNN before...........also you were all in on the Dossier when only Buzzfeed carried it.

Yup. He was already working out the lines of succession after pee-pee gate. Lol.

[Sho Nuff 719]

 

 

You're going full retard. I'm not whining about sources jacka$$ but pointing out your lame tradition of throwing out the whole story because someone used a source not 'Slo-Nutt Certified'.

 

And you have used CNN before...........also you were all in on the Dossier when only Buzzfeed carried it.

I do so when it comes from sites that do little more than fabricate stories. Conservative Treehouse and so on.

 

I haves used CNN...usually when quotes are involved. Any of it fake?

 

And Buzzfeed was the one who published the dossier. Which is why it was ever even brought up.

 

A dossier that exists...in fact. A dossier that I have shown that much has been corroborated.

 

The only think your showing is you whine about things that were proven to be actual real stories.

 

Dumbass

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

You're whining about two sources I don't actually use.

Dipshit

 

You claim not to use CNN here..............

 

I do so when it comes from sites that do little more than fabricate stories. Conservative Treehouse and so on.

 

I haves used CNN...usually when quotes are involved. Any of it fake?

 

And here (on the same focking page) you admit to using it. So we can draw one of three conclusions from this.

 

A. You're a liar.

B. You're completely batsh!t crazy and should seek help immediately.

C. You're ignorant and can't keep track of all your assertions.

 

Anyone like to pick an option?

[Sho Nuff 719]

 

You claim not to use CNN here..............

 

 

And here (on the same focking page) you admit to using it. So we can draw one of three conclusions from this.

 

A. You're a liar.

B. You're completely batsh!t crazy and should seek help immediately.

C. You're ignorant and can't keep track of all your assertions.

 

Anyone like to pick an option?

You have a fun night being an idiot...

[Cdub100 3,380]

 

You claim not to use CNN here..............

 

 

And here (on the same focking page) you admit to using it. So we can draw one of three conclusions from this.

 

A. You're a liar.

B. You're completely batsh!t crazy and should seek help immediately.

C. You're ignorant and can't keep track of all your assertions.

 

Anyone like to pick an option?

 

A

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

You have a fun night being an idiot...

 

So I'm an idiot for calling you out on your mistake/lie?

[SUXBNME 1,328]

Uhh...Back to the topic at hand before the sissy slap fight, was Bakers link factual or not?

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Uhh...Back to the topic at hand before the sissy slap fight, was Bakers link factual or not?

 

Yes. I posted a link from FoxNews that showed the same story basically.

[Sho Nuff 719]

 

So I'm an idiot for calling you out on your mistake/lie?

Your an idiot for the whole CNN buzzfeed thing you brought up in the first place.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Your an idiot for the whole CNN buzzfeed thing you brought up in the first place.

 

Poor Slo.........Still hasn't grasped the concept of calling someone an idiot while not being able to master grammar.