Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Filthy Fernadez

Judge blocks Trump Sanctuary city defunding order

Recommended Posts

Okay let me guess.

 

This judge is on the west coast, probably cali

He was probably appointed by Obama

Obama or Hillary or Pocahontas was in his area recently for a visit.

 

How did I do?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A Federal Judge Rules that municipalities do not have to follow Federal Law.

 

This Is Huge!

 

Welcome back states rights!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to interrupt the circle jerk going on here, but this is a pretty clear cut ruling for ANY judge.

 

The President doesn't have constitutional authority to attach stipulations to already appropriated federal funds. That would take a literal act of congress.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are positives to this.

I've said many times I think I'm middle of the road politically.

But I got so pissed when liberals were acting like Hitler was elected.

I kept saying we do have checks and balances. They work. Liberals covered their ears, went la la la la, and posted on fb.

 

At least this shows why this nation is one of the best in the world.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to interrupt the circle jerk going on here, but this is a pretty clear cut ruling for ANY judge.

 

The President doesn't have constitutional authority to attach stipulations to already appropriated federal funds. That would take a literal act of congress.

Pfft...facts and laws and authority are meaningless to Trumo and his defenders. All things opposing him are fake or liberal and nothing more. Very unfair.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pfft...facts and laws and authority are meaningless to Trumo and his defenders. All things opposing him are fake or liberal and nothing more. Very unfair.

You should try and bring something to the table once in a while like Saint just did. But I doubt it, you'll just continue with the same old boring tripe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Turns out the judge raised 200k for Obama.

 

Not surprising, not sure why anybody is ok with what these cities are doing. These are exactly the types of issues that guarantee the republicans stay in power. Enjoy the battle, you're losing the war.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wake me when they start ignoring federal gun laws.

 

Oh... wait

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another lose for Trump, and for everyone else.

 

Loss? Another phale for the left.

 

Didn't Obama threaten to withhold Federal Dollars if states didn't adopt his transgender rules for schools?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Loss? Another phale for the left.

 

Didn't Obama threaten to withhold Federal Dollars if states didn't adopt his transgender rules for schools?

How many executive orders has he had blocked by those who actually know the law?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Turns out the judge raised 200k for Obama.

 

Not surprising, not sure why anybody is ok with what these cities are doing. These are exactly the types of issues that guarantee the republicans stay in power. Enjoy the battle, you're losing the war.

 

Judges ruling by the law as written and sheeples who don't understanding that being herded by a demagogue...can't argue with that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Looks like Donald may have went about this the wrong way. Shame on him.

 

2. The fact that this is an actual issue where our President and Republican representatives have to find a way to enforce federal immigration laws on cities or municipalities who are outright ignoring them is MORE shameful.

 

3. I don't know campaign laws, but federal judges giving or accepting money to candidates seems odd and doesn't pass a smell test. :dunno:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is getting absurd. Liberal hack judges blocking presidential orders? Gimme a focking break.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is getting absurd. Liberal hack judges blocking presidential orders? Gimme a focking break.

So you believe in dictatorships where the President makes any rule he wants?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is getting absurd. Liberal hack judges blocking presidential orders? Gimme a focking break.

 

 

oh this hasnt happened before?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is getting absurd. Liberal hack judges blocking presidential orders? Gimme a focking break.

I seem to recall an entire party blocking a President's choice for SCOTUS when he still had a year to go in his term. Life isn't always fair.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I seem to recall an entire party blocking a President's choice for SCOTUS when he still had a year to go in his term. Life isn't always fair.

Psst, don't tell anyone else - but nobody on the Right was crying when Obama was getting blocked.. If this got out, some would look awfully silly crying about the authority of "partisan hack Federal Judges".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2. The fact that this is an actual issue where our President and Republican representatives have to find a way to enforce federal immigration laws on cities or municipalities who are outright ignoring them is MORE shameful.

 

Maybe Trump should take these cities to court then let these Liberal Judges try to rule the cities are allowed to refuse to follow Federal Immigration Laws.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

3. I don't know campaign laws, but federal judges giving or accepting money to candidates seems odd and doesn't pass a smell test. :dunno:

Agree here. Judges should remain neutral in such appearances.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I'm Trump I start verifying employment in the restaurants in these cities. Want to play? Let's play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I'm Trump I start verifying employment in the restaurants in these cities. Want to play? Let's play.

Yes, because Trump really needs to have even more people hate him. Is he shooting for 20% approval? lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, because Trump really needs to have even more people hate him. Is he shooting for 20% approval? lol

You're in favor of illegal immigration? How come?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're in favor of illegal immigration? How come?

I'm in favor of giving those who are already here a path to citizenship. hth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in favor of giving those who are already here a path to citizenship. hth

Well that would have to be voted on. In the meantime, we have laws already voted on. So just disregard those laws? Why?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Looks like Donald may have went about this the wrong way. Shame on him.

 

2. The fact that this is an actual issue where our President and Republican representatives have to find a way to enforce federal immigration laws on cities or municipalities who are outright ignoring them is MORE shameful.

 

3. I don't know campaign laws, but federal judges giving or accepting money to candidates seems odd and doesn't pass a smell test. :dunno:

:pointstosky:

 

Good posting. Those first two points are spot on. (Not that the third isn't but I'm 100% positive it's super common on both sides)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in favor of giving those who are already here a path to citizenship. hth

 

Cool, me too.

 

Doesn't mean a city should not report illegals who commit crimes or refuse Federal Agents access to illegals if needed.

 

Pssst. Sanctuary cities have been around before Trump was sworn in, this isn't a "Trump" issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Judges ruling by the law as written and sheeples who don't understanding that being herded by a demagogue...can't argue with that.

 

Yes Honcho, we're all idiots. How about forming a sentence with comprehensible English next time?

 

Thanks in advance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Cool, me too.

 

Doesn't mean a city should not report illegals who commit crimes or refuse Federal Agents access to illegals if needed.

 

Pssst. Sanctuary cities have been around before Trump was sworn in, this isn't a "Trump" issue.

I am for the deportation of illegals that commit crimes. (cue the retards saying "it's a crime for illegals to be here in the first place")

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Looks like Donald may have went about this the wrong way. Shame on him.

 

2. The fact that this is an actual issue where our President and Republican representatives have to find a way to enforce federal immigration laws on cities or municipalities who are outright ignoring them is MORE shameful.

 

3. I don't know campaign laws, but federal judges giving or accepting money to candidates seems odd and doesn't pass a smell test. :dunno:

 

Maybe I don't fully understand what's going on here, but living in California it's obviously a hot topic. How I understand it, California is just not using local funds and law enforcement to perform what should be the job of the federal government to begin with (border protection and immigration). I don't really see a problem with that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am for the deportation of illegals that commit crimes. (cue the retards saying "it's a crime for illegals to be here in the first place")

Well Newbie, they can't get deported if the local cops don't turn them over to ICE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Maybe I don't fully understand what's going on here, but living in California it's obviously a hot topic. How I understand it, California is just not using local funds and law enforcement to perform what should be the job of the federal government to begin with (border protection and immigration). I don't really see a problem with that?

They are refusing to cooperate with federal immigration agencies. LAPD locks up an illegal immigrant for a crime and they don't notify ICE so he can possibly be deported.
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Maybe I don't fully understand what's going on here, but living in California it's obviously a hot topic. How I understand it, California is just not using local funds and law enforcement to perform what should be the job of the federal government to begin with (border protection and immigration). I don't really see a problem with that?

 

HB sorta hit on it above. I think there are varying degrees of a "Sanctuary City". It's one thing to do what you state above. Okay fine, whatever. But there are cities that outright refuse to work with Federal Agencies. That is the aspect that most people can't understand.

 

As an example:

 

Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, an undocumented immigrant, had seven felony convictions in the United States and had been deported from the country five times. Yet, the city of San Francisco declined to detain him for Immigration and Customs Enforcement Officials (ICE) officials and released him into the community. In July 2015, Lopez-Sanchez was charged with murdering Katie Steinle in San Francisco.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am for the deportation of illegals that commit crimes. (cue the retards saying "it's a crime for illegals to be here in the first place")

 

So you're aware you're ignorant?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

HB sorta hit on it above. I think there are varying degrees of a "Sanctuary City". It's one thing to do what you state above. Okay fine, whatever. But there are cities that outright refuse to work with Federal Agencies. That is the aspect that most people can't understand.

 

As an example:

 

 

Got it. That, I 100% disagree with. Even if a beat cop picks up an illegal with a prior felony, it should trigger some sort of system, where immigration authorities are notified and they're processed properly.

 

I just don't think cities/states should be using local resources to perform the job of immigration agents (ICE raids, etc). Also, living in the agriculture capital of America, I see the value of your basic immigrant working illegally. I'd like to see a path to citizenship for those people. There's a lot of gray area I guess...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×