Kavanaugh sexual misconduct in High School

[Voltaire 4,558]

 

She only gave up her anonymity after reporters started poking around. She WANTED to be anonymous. She was forced to identify herself.

 

That's unconfirmable and unknowable but it is Dianne Feinstein's spin/explanation for the conveniently perfect timing of it all.

[Strike 3,974]

 

That's unconfirmable and unknowable but it is Dianne Feinstein's spin/explanation for the conveniently perfect timing of it all.

 

No. Diane Feinstein explained why she went public with the report. But she kept the chick anonymous. A few days later the chick did an interview with a newspaper and said she was starting to have reporters poking around and realized they would out her and wanted to get in front of it so she did the interview.

[Sho Nuff 719]

Even though there was no rape, the allegations are still pretty bad.

 

I think a few things ... she's accusing the 17 y/o boy he was, not a 54 y/o man he is. Even if he did it back then, which is unprovable with no evidence, he was a kid and hasn't done anything like this in the ensuing 36 years. But then how can you take her word over his when i

t's all he said/she said with no evidence?

 

As we've seen, there's so much deep emotions over this nomination, consequently, providing a strong, strong motivation for somebody that knew him back in the day that opposes his nomination to thwart him by any means necessary even if that means coming forward and lying her ass off.

Not saying she's a liar, just that there's no shortage of radical leftists that would have a massive incentive to lie.

Few things...we have no other accusations that we know of. If he did it as a 17 year old what was described that alone should be disqualifying...that he has now lied about ever even being there would also be disqualifying.

She spoke of this in therapy years ago so it didnt just come up. She sent his letter before he was the nominee...so the incentive to make this up doesnt logically account for her story.

[KSB2424 3,083]

My theory?

 

35 years ago maybe something "inappropriate" happened, but nothing to the extent of how she explains it now. Much like that fish you caught when you were 15 and now tell the story.......the fish has doubled in size. I'm sure there is some semblance of truth but over time, in her mind, there is so much hyperbole and sugar coated on the story it only has an ounce of truth to it. The "I was almost inadvertently murdered!@#!" is the icing on the cake for me.

 

Sorta like my favorite saying when me and my friends talk about our high school sports stories. The older I get, the better I was.

 

 

Better yet, think of a Digby story on this bored.

[Voltaire 4,558]

Few things...we have no other accusations that we know of. If he did it as a 17 year old what was described that alone should be disqualifying...that he has now lied about ever even being there would also be disqualifying.

She spoke of this in therapy years ago so it didnt just come up. She sent his letter before he was the nominee...so the incentive to make this up doesnt logically account for her story.

Maybe he didn't lie. Maybe she's the liar. They both have strong motivation to lie. It's he said/she said, there's no evidence one way or the other, you can believe whichever one you want.

 

If he gets blocked over this, anybody with a grudge can feel free to pull this #metoo card and lie their ass off from now until forever if they have a casual aquantence with somebody famous they don't like.

 

She may well have been planing ahead to torpedo him. It took her 29 years to feel bad about it, convieniently, when he was whispered as a potential future SCOTUS appointee.

[TimmySmith 2,782]

But should be investigated and all sides heard.

It's a hearing, not an investigation. Therefore no truth will be achieved. She can basically say whatever she wants. So can he. That's why it is a kangaroo court.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Even though there was no rape, the allegations are still pretty bad.

 

I think a few things ... she's accusing the 17 y/o boy he was, not a 54 y/o man he is. Even if he did it back then, which is unprovable with no evidence, he was a kid and hasn't done anything like this in the ensuing 36 years. But then how can you take her word over his when it's all he said/she said with no evidence?

 

As we've seen, there's so much deep emotions over this nomination, consequently, providing a strong, strong motivation for somebody that knew him back in the day that opposes his nomination to thwart him by any means necessary even if that means coming forward and lying her ass off. Not saying she's a liar, just that there's no shortage of radical leftists that would have a massive incentive to lie.

 

How long before we find out someone was willing to pay her to come forward just like the ones they tried paying right before the 2016 election? The one lady was offered nearly $1,000,000 to be the October surprise.

[Sho Nuff 719]

Maybe he didn't lie. Maybe she's the liar. They both have strong motivation to lie. It's he said/she said, there's no evidence one way or the other, you can believe whichever one you want.

 

If he gets blocked over this, anybody with a grudge can feel free to pull this #metoo card and lie their ass off from now until forever if they have a casual aquantence with somebody famous they don't like.

I agree with the maybe...which is why I said if...because you said Even if he did it back then.

[Sho Nuff 719]

It's a hearing, not an investigation. Therefore no truth will be achieved. She can basically say whatever she wants. So can he. That's why it is a kangaroo court.

Which is why I said it should be investigated.

[TimmySmith 2,782]

How long before we find out someone was willing to pay her to come forward just like the ones they tried paying right before the 2016 election? The one lady was offered nearly $1,000,000 to be the October surprise.

I want to know who actually wrote the letter. Clearly wasn't her.

[TimmySmith 2,782]

Which is why I said it should be investigated.

By whom? And for what reason?

[Voltaire 4,558]

And why would she want that?

 

Well, have you considered that maybe it's because she's one of the tens of thousands of leftists losing their mind that he might become a SCOTUS justice and would stop at nothing to thwart him?

 

If I grew up in New York, to save America, I might have taken one for the team and alleged that Sonia Sotomayor had sexually assaulted me. Evidence/Schmevidence. Just make up sh*t. It's plausible after all, she's built like a nose tackle and it's hard to believe anybody would touch her willingly.

[Sho Nuff 719]

By whom? And for what reason?

Not by senators? Because it appears possible its a credible accusation about a man about to have a lifetime seat in the highest court in the land and there are already honesty issues surrounding him. There is a reason some urged Trump not to select thisman.

[Sho Nuff 719]

 

Well, have you considered that maybe it's because she's one of the tens of thousands of leftists losing their mind that he might become a SCOTUS justice and would stop at nothing to thwart him?

 

If I grew up in New York, to save America, I might have taken one for the team and alleged that Sonia Sotomayor had sexually assaulted me. Evidence/Schmevidence. Just make up sh*t. It's plausible after all, she's built like a nose tackle and it's hard to believe anybody would touch her willingly.

So she went to therapy years ago and talked about this just in case? Again...the entire story makes this she just did this as a leftist isnt logical.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

There is a reason some urged Trump not to select thisman.

 

Because the Dems don't think it's fair? Poor snowflakes.

[TimmySmith 2,782]

Not by senators? Because it appears possible its a credible accusation about a man about to have a lifetime seat in the highest court in the land and there are already honesty issues surrounding him. There is a reason some urged Trump not to select thisman.

It's a hearing dimwit, not an investigation. People can get in the chair and spout any story they want with no repercussions. No judges, no juries. Yes, I know they are under oath, doesn't matter. Credible, true, false or otherwise we will never find out. I will not condemn a nominee under those circumstances. If you will, so be it.

[Voltaire 4,558]

So she went to therapy years ago and talked about this just in case? Again...the entire story makes this she just did this as a leftist isnt logical.

Did you notice that she brought up the man's occupation when she talked to the therapist? Would she have brought it up if he were a Walmart greeter instead?

[Patriotsfatboy1 1,432]

You guys aren't so good at math. He is 53 now and 35 years ago he would have been 17 or 18. This isn't some 14 year old fooling around.

[Voltaire 4,558]

You guys aren't so good at math. He is 53 now and 35 years ago he would have been 17 or 18. This isn't some 14 year old fooling around.

I didn't know how old he is, I knew a few years older than me and pulled a reasonably close number.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

You guys aren't so good at math. He is 53 now and 35 years ago he would have been 17 or 18. This isn't some 14 year old fooling around.

 

Because you mature so well in those 3 years?

[KSB2424 3,083]

You guys aren't so good at math. He is 53 now and 35 years ago he would have been 17 or 18. This isn't some 14 year old fooling around.

She was 15

He was 17

 

Both in High School.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

She was 15

He was 17

 

Both in High School.

 

Coincidence in the age at which she's claiming this happened? I tend to think not. That would be criminal had the statute of limitations not run on it.

 

This is a focking hit job............nothing more or less.

[Patriotsfatboy1 1,432]

 

Because you mature so well in those 3 years?

 

Umm, yes you should. In the eyes of the law, it makes a huge difference as well.

[KSB2424 3,083]

Politics is a dirty game. Sheesh.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

 

Umm, yes you should. In the eyes of the law, it makes a huge difference as well.

 

No boy suddenly turns into a man from 14 to 17. Legally, I agree there's a difference as I previously stated. That time frame was chosen for that reason.

[Patriotsfatboy1 1,432]

 

No boy suddenly turns into a man from 14 to 17. Legally, I agree there's a difference as I previously stated. That time frame was chosen for that reason.

 

I have a 15 year old and a 17 year old. Both boys. There is a tremendous amount of maturity that occurs between 14 and 17.

[KSB2424 3,083]

Oh Dear God

[Sho Nuff 719]

It's a hearing dimwit, not an investigation. People can get in the chair and spout any story they want with no repercussions. No judges, no juries. Yes, I know they are under oath, doesn't matter. Credible, true, false or otherwise we will never find out. I will not condemn a nominee under those circumstances. If you will, so be it.

No ...I want it investigated and not by the shitshow a hearing would be where the same fools on one side will attack this woman. Though, that would actually be good for the opposing party before midterms to have them questioning her that way.

I think you can determine credible by hearing testimony...and if stories have changed and who is more forthcoming vs. trying to hide things.

[crackattack 513]

Felons can serve in the Senate and House. Become a Mayor or serve in local government.

 

Felons can make millions in entertainment and sports.

 

Felons can become President.

 

Felons can become CEO's and employ 1000's.

 

Felons can vote in certain states and other states are trying to make it law.

 

Felony charged illegal immigrants are are allowed to stay in the US in certain states and allowed to strive for their dreams by attending college, become small business owners, earn high paying jobs etc.

 

People can still reach the highest or peak of their jobs with convictions.

 

Yet a man with no other accusations as an adult, no other accusations what so ever can be taken down by a non provable accusation of a 15 y/o who had been drinking also some 35 years ago. A "possible" one time "forcibly groped" by a "extremely intoxicated" (her words I believe) 17 y/o can stop someone from achieving their dream job.

 

Let that sink in. It's a hit job and nothing more. It's politics at it's ugliest. It's sickening.

[Sho Nuff 719]

Did you notice that she brought up the man's occupation when she talked to the therapist? Would she have brought it up if he were a Walmart greeter instead?

You mean she brought up the power he may have over her...how about the power at 15 years old of the boy's mother being a judge as a reason not to come forward.

You aren't really helping your own case here.

[Sho Nuff 719]

Felons can serve in the Senate and House. Become a Mayor or serve in local government.

 

Felons can make millions in entertainment and sports.

 

Felons can become President.

 

Felons can become CEO's and employ 1000's.

 

Felons can vote in certain states and other states are trying to make it law.

 

Felony charged illegal immigrants are are allowed to stay in the US in certain states and allowed to strive for their dreams by attending college, become small business owners, earn high paying jobs etc.

 

People can still reach the highest or peak of their jobs with convictions.

 

Yet a man with no other accusations as an adult, no other accusations what so ever can be taken down by a non provable accusation of a 15 y/o who had been drinking also some 35 years ago. A "possible" one time "forcibly groped" by a "extremely intoxicated" (her words I believe) 17 y/o can stop someone from achieving their dream job.

 

Let that sink in. It's a hit job and nothing more. It's politics at it's ugliest. It's sickening.

 

Its a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the land...I think its reasonable to expect those people to be above entertainers and illegal immigrants that the right wants to demonize as well.

Forcibly groped and held her mouth...and then lied up and down about it is what would make it disqualifying.

[crackattack 513]

 

I have a 15 year old and a 17 year old. Both boys. There is a tremendous amount of maturity that occurs between 14 and 17.

And if they were "extremely intoxicated"? Would you want their career capped due to something unprovable they might have done while drunk? As teens?

[drobeski 3,061]

 

Its a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the land...I think its reasonable to expect those people to be above entertainers and illegal immigrants that the right wants to demonize as well.

Forcibly groped and held her mouth...and then lied up and down about it is what would make it disqualifying.

prove it

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

No ######...I want it investigated and not by the shitshow a hearing would be where the same fools on one side will attack this woman.

 

But you're okay with the Dems already vicious attacks on Kavanaugh (which are sure to ramp up during this sh!tshow)

 

Not to mention this woman hasn't agreed to testify in the hearing yet. Why; because it's open for everyone to see? Funny how the Dems for the last several months have preferred closed door sh!tshows where they can try and frame the narrative once the cameras are on them.

[MDC 5,890]

Donald sure seems to like the gropey wont take no for an answer sexual harassment / child pedo type. Bunch of sex criminal creepers.

[crackattack 513]

 

Its a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the land...I think its reasonable to expect those people to be above entertainers and illegal immigrants that the right wants to demonize as well.

Forcibly groped and held her mouth...and then lied up and down about it is what would make it disqualifying.

So what he possibly did once, as an intoxicated teen should stop him? He has an entire body of work as an adult that shows he's not a sexual predator. He has no other accusers. He's been an upstanding legal expert. But this, this one time teenage, unprovable, can't be charged, possible drunken incident should stop him? No. No it shouldn't.

[Sho Nuff 719]

prove it

 

What part of "is what would make it disqualifying" don't you understand?

Im saying if that happened...that is why its disqualifying and any list of felon can do this and that is idiotic to compare to a seat on the SC.

[drobeski 3,061]

Donald sure seems to like the gropey wont take no for an answer sexual harassment / child pedo type. Bunch of sex criminal creepers.

pretty sure he's not too keen on Biden, Barry and the molesta bros.

 

The quadfecta of pedos

[Sho Nuff 719]

So what he possibly did once, as an intoxicated teen should stop him? He has an entire body of work as an adult that shows he's not a sexual predator. He has no other accusers. He's been an upstanding legal expert. But this, this one time teenage, unprovable, can't be charged, possible drunken incident should stop him? No. No it shouldn't.

 

That he did it...and lied about it and allowed his party to drag the woman through the mud? Yes...his entire body of work is then meaningless when talking about a SC justice. I don't think its unreasonable to want SC justices to be of higher moral character than that.

Doing that is bad even at 17....lying about it is what should then stop him.

Do you think if its proven he did it...he was there...and he lied about it while people call this woman all sorts of names...that he should still be a part of the Supreme Court for the rest of his life?

[Sho Nuff 719]

pretty sure he's not too keen on Biden, Barry and the molesta bros.

 

The quadfecta of pedos

Biden...no actual pedo accusations.

Barry...no actual pedo accusations.

Podestas...you always act as if they are the same person...it helps your little narrative I guess. For normal people...it just makes you look like the trolling hack that you are.

 

Swing and a miss as usual drobeski.