Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
kutulu

Self Defense Killing in Florida...Geeks got an opinion?

Recommended Posts

 

Case in point. :thumbsup:

From what little I've read ... Seems like, etc. yeah I really had him tried and convicted. Also I was laughing at your editorial commentary not the report.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Well see, already this morning I've been accused by Worms of seeing what I want to see to fit my own personal narrative of the case (there are not enough :rolleyes: on the internets to fully convey my feeling of :rolleyes: on that front) and laughed at by MDC for quoting the police transcript, one of the few incontrovertible pieces of evidence available in this case. So I figured it was worth pointing out how early in the case, and on what flimsy information, these two had made up their minds about what occurred. Of course they have slowly been forced to change their opinions, until the character assault on Zimmerman is all they have left to work with.

 

You mean someone on the internet came to a possibly incorrect conclusion based on limited information and shared their opinion on a message board?

 

Oh, the horror!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You mean someone on the internet came to a possibly incorrect conclusion based on limited information and shared their opinion on a message board?

 

Oh, the horror!!!

 

Yeah, and then later tried to bust someone else's balls for "seeing what you want to see". Maybe you can see the irony there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From what little I've read ... Seems like, etc. yeah I really had him tried and convicted. Also I was laughing at your editorial commentary not the report.

 

The editorial commentary where I pointed out the simple fact that at no point was Zimmerman given any kind of directive or order not to follow, just a simple "we don't need you to do that" ? Go ahead and laugh I guess. I realize you don't have much to work with at this point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do Dems wanted Guilty and Reps wanted innocent?

 

You people are focking monkees.

Reps tend to base things on substantive things like facts, while demwits base everything on emotion and wanting to whip up the latest faux racism.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The editorial commentary where I pointed out the simple fact that at no point was Zimmerman given any kind of directive or order not to follow, just a simple "we don't need you to do that" ? .

Yes, that was the funny part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do Dems wanted Guilty and Reps wanted innocent?

 

You people are focking monkees.

Of all forms of slavery there is none that is so harmful and degrading as that form of slavery which tempts one human being to hate another by reason of his race or color. - Booker T. Washington

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, some of you guys really need to get me put of your head. It's flattering and all, but seriously it's getting a little weird too. :unsure:

 

Anyway, like I said in the other thread--the one that didn't have to be bumped from months ago--I admit I was wrong per the jury's verdict. I still think Zimmerman was guilty in the grand sense but there was plenty of reasonable doubt as evidenced by the jury's decision.

 

HTH :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, some of you guys really need to get me put of your head. It's flattering and all, but seriously it's getting a little weird too. :unsure:

 

Anyway, like I said in the other thread--the one that didn't have to be bumped from months ago--I admit I was wrong per the jury's verdict. I still think Zimmerman was guilty in the grand sense but there was plenty of reasonable doubt as evidenced by the jury's decision.

 

HTH :thumbsup:

 

Uh yeah, everyone I engage in discussion on a discussion bored is clearly in my head.

 

But just so we're all on the same page; that "other thread" would be the one where you, already having formed a strong opinion based on very limited information very early in the process, only to have your theory to be shown repeatedly to be way off base, accused me of seeing what I wanted to see to fit my "narrative", even though I've said very little about the case that doesn't fit with the available evidence. Is that about right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Uh yeah, everyone I engage in discussion on a discussion bored is clearly in my head.

 

But just so we're all on the same page; that "other thread" would be the one where you, already having formed a strong opinion based on very limited information very early in the process, only to have your theory to be shown repeatedly to be way off base, accused me of seeing what I wanted to see to fit my "narrative", even though I've said very little about the case that doesn't fit with the available evidence. Is that about right?

That's the one. Although, again, you're distorting the facts to fit your agenda. :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Reps tend to base things on substantive things like facts, while demwits base everything on emotion and wanting to whip up the latest faux racism.

 

Hah...funniest thing you have said in a while.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the one. Although, again, you're distorting the facts to fit your agenda. :thumbsup:

 

Which facts, specifically?

 

I don't have an agenda.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×