wiffleball 4,640 Posted November 3, 2017 I don't know what the rule is now. But the next time they renegotiate contracts all I want the owners to do is force every God damn issue into binding arbitration. Jesus Christ, a coach can't make a player run laps without it turning into a Supreme Court case. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,640 Posted November 3, 2017 I think he might win He'll still be a kneegrow. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jesus Chrysler 29 Posted November 3, 2017 Vuducville, stop picking on me. You're intimidating me. I don't like when people are nasty. I would rather just lie and exaggerate all day long and have no one call me out on it. Now get over here and wipe my tears you big meanie. Lol. Holy crap, Dgib is a pansy ass. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Djgb13 2,338 Posted November 3, 2017 Vuducville, stop picking on me. You're intimidating me. I don't like when people are nasty. I would rather just lie and exaggerate all day long and have no one call me out on it. Now get over here and wipe my tears you big meanie. Lol. Holy crap, Dgib is a pansy ass. Oompah loompah doopadah dee. Newbie cries "everyone picks on me" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fireballer 2,381 Posted November 3, 2017 Shut up Newbie. Has this guy admitted he's newbie yet? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Djgb13 2,338 Posted November 3, 2017 Has this guy admitted he's newbie yet? No but the fact that he knows who Adam was pretty much confirms it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
12th Man 884 Posted November 3, 2017 but if you're game is to go around stalking certain posters who you don't agree with and being a tool: *your* what a tool bag. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
12th Man 884 Posted November 3, 2017 Has this guy admitted he's newbie yet?Nope. Too much of a pvssy to admit it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gepetto 985 Posted November 4, 2017 The very first reply was a Hillarv attack. How is this Kaepernick story related in any way to the Clintons? Don't be such an ass hole all your life. You have Hillary's finger so far up your asz and Bill's d!ck deep in your throat you are experiencing so much joy, pain, sorrow, embarrassment and shame you can't possibly follow this story with a clear thinking mind. Enjoy your debauchery. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gepetto 985 Posted November 4, 2017 Just smash the phones with hammers. It worked for Clinton. And Tom Brady. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Beyond Chaos 75 Posted November 4, 2017 I could care less about either the owners or Kaepernick, but is this all it takes these days to get access to someone's e-mails and phone records? I think (insert names) is conspiring against me, I want access to all their e-mails and phone records. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,584 Posted November 4, 2017 I could care less about either the owners or Kaepernick, but is this all it takes these days to get access to someone's e-mails and phone records? I think (insert names) is conspiring against me, I want access to all their e-mails and phone records. Yep I'd say come and get it focker Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 2,515 Posted November 4, 2017 I don't know how a judge just signs off on "Okay, Give 'em all your cell phone records" because some guy doesn't want to admit the truth. This smells more like Kaep is fishing for information more than anyone colluded. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,584 Posted November 4, 2017 Is it collusion if bob calls jerry and asks what do you think about signing kaep. And jerry says I wouldn't do it. That's media suicide Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gepetto 985 Posted November 4, 2017 Is it collusion if bob calls jerry and asks what do you think about signing kaep. And jerry says I wouldn't do it. That's media suicide I would say no, but crybabies would say it is. It's not though. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
penultimatestraw 473 Posted November 4, 2017 No but the fact that he knows who Adam was pretty much confirms itHe was referring to Eve's Adam, not GFIAFP. Are you suggesting Newbie is religious? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jesus Chrysler 29 Posted November 4, 2017 No but the fact that he knows who Adam was pretty much confirms it what does this even mean? Who is Adam and when was he ever referred to? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TommyGavin 788 Posted November 4, 2017 Yeah but wayne brady is a white black guy. Don't think Colin K is ghey though Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TommyGavin 788 Posted November 4, 2017 No but the fact that he knows who Adam was pretty much confirms it You do know "I don't know you from Adam" is a common phrase right ? Dumb Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jesus Chrysler 29 Posted November 4, 2017 You do know "I don't know you from Adam" is a common phrase right ? Dumb OMFG. That's what he meant? Lolol Dumb as the day is long. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,485 Posted November 4, 2017 If Kaep can prove that someone told someone else that they would not sign him under any circumstance, he might have something. What he is really trying to do is embarrass the owners here. That is not collusion by itself. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kutulu 1,545 Posted November 5, 2017 I don't know how a judge just signs off on "Okay, Give 'em all your cell phone records" because some guy doesn't want to admit the truth. This smells more like Kaep is fishing for information more than anyone colluded. from what I read the email and text searches are limited to what certain word searches pull as results ...I don't believe it's open to "all" records. The list of searchable words was recently expanded though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DonS 3,067 Posted November 5, 2017 from what I read the email and text searches are limited to what certain word searches pull as results ...I don't believe it's open to "all" records. The list of searchable words was recently expanded though. They're focked if there is an email thread with the subject of "Let's collude against Kaepernick because he knelt for the anthem". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kutulu 1,545 Posted November 5, 2017 They're focked if there is an email thread with the subject of "Let's collude against Kaepernick because he knelt for the anthem". it does seem like it would have to be something about as blatant as that for it to stick, imo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted November 5, 2017 That is not collusion by itself.According to the CBA it is. 1 team can collude against an available athlete. Still has to be proven that it was team policy. Such as an owner instructing a gm. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,584 Posted November 5, 2017 According to the CBA it is. 1 team can collude against an available athlete. Still has to be proven that it was team policy. Such as an owner instructing a gm. so the owner has no say over the type of players on his team? I gotta call BS Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gepetto 985 Posted November 5, 2017 It's never going to be collusion if an owner states his opinion about signing or not signing a free agent player to his team. He's not telling the other owner what he should do then there is no collusion. I wish Johnnie Cochrane was still alive to explain this in the elegant way only he could. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,485 Posted November 5, 2017 According to the CBA it is. 1 team can collude against an available athlete. Still has to be proven that it was team policy. Such as an owner instructing a gm. Collusion is an agreement between two or more parties, sometimes illegal and therefore secretive, to limit open competition by deceiving, misleading, or defrauding others of their legal rights, or to obtain an objective forbidden by law typically by defrauding or gaining an unfair market advantage. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collusion Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted November 5, 2017 so the owner has no say over the type of players on his team? I gotta call BS Well think about it thos way. The CBA is an agreement to protectboth sides. The NFL job market is limited. If each of the teams makes an independent decision not to sign a player he is forced out. The NFLPA can't allow that. Therefore 1 team colluding is no different than 2 or 32. Look in the CBA under collusion. It's right there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thornton Melon 544 Posted November 5, 2017 It's never going to be collusion if an owner states his opinion about signing or not signing a free agent player to his team. He's not telling the other owner what he should do then there is no collusion. I wish Johnnie Cochrane was still alive to explain this in the elegant way only he could. Jackie Chiles would do it better 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,584 Posted April 12, 2018 ESPN's Adam Schefter reports the Seahawks postponed free agent Colin Kaepernick's visit when he declined to stop kneeling during the national anthem next season. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,584 Posted April 12, 2018 Well think about it thos way. The CBA is an agreement to protectboth sides. The NFL job market is limited. If each of the teams makes an independent decision not to sign a player he is forced out. The NFLPA can't allow that. Therefore 1 team colluding is no different than 2 or 32. Look in the CBA under collusion. It's right there. so why does Fred Jackson not have a job, each team independently decided not to sign him, so there is collusion there Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,564 Posted April 12, 2018 Days like these are when I miss newbie most Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,080 Posted April 12, 2018 Jackie Chiles would do it better Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LOD01 191 Posted April 12, 2018 ESPN's Adam Schefter reports the Seahawks postponed free agent Colin Kaepernick's visit when he declined to stop kneeling during the national anthem next season. I love it when the NFL punches this dickhead right in the face. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
posty 2,296 Posted April 12, 2018 Days like these are when I miss newbie most Words that no one should ever say together... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,642 Posted April 12, 2018 ESPN's Adam Schefter reports the Seahawks postponed free agent Colin Kaepernick's visit when he declined to stop kneeling during the national anthem next season. Didn't he say at one point he wouldn't kneel? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,080 Posted April 12, 2018 Words that no one should ever say together... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,584 Posted April 12, 2018 Didn't he say at one point he wouldn't kneel? yes he did, and he probably realized that was dumb to say, as it makes him seem like a hypocrite, also then his football skills would actually show hes garbage, and he wouldn't be able to whine foul play anymore 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kilroy69 994 Posted April 12, 2018 yes he did, and he probably realized that was dumb to say, as it makes him seem like a hypocrite, also then his football skills would actually show hes garbage, and he wouldn't be able to whine foul play anymore He absolutely 100% never ever said he would stand. Ever. Word leaked out of his camp that said he would and the media took it as confirmation. At NO TIME did he PERSONALLY ever make the claim himself. That way he can ride the razors edge. He can claim to the NFL that he won't kneel and keep face with the black community he is so ingrained into now that he dates a black girl. "Colin Kaepernick,would not assure Seattle that he will not continue to kneel during the national anthem, so the Seahawks postponed a visit with the free agent quarterback" from A story published today. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites