Jump to content



Photo

Not relevant


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#1 JCW412

JCW412

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 3,227 posts

Posted 20 July 2005 - 09:47 PM

Not relevant

Edited by singman, 17 March 2009 - 09:26 AM.


#2 GameDay Guru

GameDay Guru

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 1,343 posts

Posted 21 July 2005 - 03:15 AM

Any chance we could expand rosters to 25 as part of this change?

#3 Wuerffel for MVP

Wuerffel for MVP

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 2,809 posts

Posted 21 July 2005 - 04:38 AM

Any chance we could expand rosters to 25 as part of this change?

:pointstosky:

#4 JCW412

JCW412

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 3,227 posts

Posted 21 July 2005 - 05:35 AM

Please vote on the proposal as well as bumping the roster limit to 25.

I vote yes to the roster limit and the change for 2006


#5 GameDay Guru

GameDay Guru

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 1,343 posts

Posted 21 July 2005 - 06:28 AM

Yes to both

#6 Wuerffel for MVP

Wuerffel for MVP

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 2,809 posts

Posted 21 July 2005 - 07:29 AM

Yes to both as a package deal.
No to the addition of a wide receiver slot WITHOUT a roster limit increase.
Yes to roster limit increase without the addition of a wide receiver slot.

#7 JCW412

JCW412

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 3,227 posts

Posted 21 July 2005 - 08:01 AM

Current vote for adding a WR to the starting lineup and increasing the roster limit to 25 for the 2006 season.

Yes :angry: -
JCW
GDG
W4MVP

NO :angry: -

#8 The Moz

The Moz

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 29,101 posts

Posted 21 July 2005 - 08:32 AM

I would vote No to this

however if it was ammended to a RBWRWRFlexFlex instead I would :banana:

#9 JCW412

JCW412

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 3,227 posts

Posted 21 July 2005 - 08:34 AM

Current vote for adding a WR to the starting lineup and increasing the roster limit to 25 for the 2006 season.

Yes :pointstosky: -
JCW
GDG
W4MVP

NO :banana: -
Moz

Still waiting on 8 votes

#10 Dr. Octopus

Dr. Octopus

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 7,160 posts

Posted 21 July 2005 - 10:18 AM

I vote "yes" to both for '06.
Slipped my tongue in someone else's pie
Tasting better ev'ry time
He turned green and tried to make me cry
Being hungry it ain't no crime

- M. Jagger/K. Richards

#11 Shox

Shox

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 2,062 posts

Posted 21 July 2005 - 05:12 PM

yes to both

#12 JCW412

JCW412

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 3,227 posts

Posted 21 July 2005 - 05:46 PM

Current vote for adding a WR to the starting lineup and increasing the roster limit to 25 for the 2006 season.

Yes :D -
JCW
GDG
W4MVP
Dr.O
Shox

NO :mad: -
Moz

6 votes to go or 2 yes votes.

#13 The Brain

The Brain

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 892 posts

Posted 21 July 2005 - 06:15 PM

yes for roster change
no for expanded roster

#14 JCW412

JCW412

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 3,227 posts

Posted 21 July 2005 - 06:23 PM

yes for roster change
no for expanded roster

We are voting on a the two as a pair right now - an all or none type thing. How would you vote then?

#15 Captain Lou

Captain Lou

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 1,863 posts

Posted 21 July 2005 - 11:25 PM

I am in, Yes to both <_<

#16 The Brain

The Brain

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 892 posts

Posted 22 July 2005 - 07:30 PM

yes for roster change
no for expanded roster

We are voting on a the two as a pair right now - an all or none type thing. How would you vote then?

Then it is yes, it is only 1 additional player, but I don't see the need

#17 JCW412

JCW412

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 3,227 posts

Posted 23 July 2005 - 03:22 PM

It looks like the change will be effective for the 2006 season regardless of how the others vote.

Current vote for adding a WR to the starting lineup and increasing the roster limit to 25 for the 2006 season.

Yes  :banana:  -
JCW
GDG
W4MVP
Dr.O
Shox
The Brain
Captain Lou

NO  :bandana:  -
Moz



#18 pmoe33

pmoe33

    FF Rookie

  • Members
  • 31 posts

Posted 27 July 2005 - 01:30 PM

I know I'm late and my vote doesn't matter, but I'm with Moz on this.

#19 JCW412

JCW412

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 3,227 posts

Posted 28 July 2005 - 10:32 AM

Singman - can you possibly send out an email or stick this for a bit so everyone is aware of the change for 2006? We don't want to have any issues with that.

#20 The Moz

The Moz

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 29,101 posts

Posted 28 July 2005 - 03:14 PM

I just don't see the need to add a postion - I just think it would be better just to ammend it a little and make 1 of the mandatory RB slots into another flex. To me that just makes more sense.

I will live with the decision here but just am personally against it.

#21 Captain Lou

Captain Lou

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 1,863 posts

Posted 28 July 2005 - 08:26 PM

I just don't see the need to add a postion - I just think it would be better just to ammend it a little and make 1 of the mandatory RB slots into another flex.  To me that just makes more sense. 

I will live with the decision here but just am personally against it.


I think by adding another receiver to the roster will balance the head to head
scoring a little more. I have not spent time lately on the math, but any team in this league who owns three of the 32 starting tail backs has a clear advantage in yards and points on a weekly basis.

With more and more teams going to two backs, specialty backs, or RBBC, the teams in this league who do own three legit starters who produce yards and touches every week should outpoint every team who may just have a legit starter, and a roster full of RBBC.

I have never been a big fan of any leagues that allowed a three back starting
lineup using the flex. I would much prefer a flex to be used for other positions
due to the shrinking population of legit every down backs. Plus you almost have to nuke your team in order to cut a deal for one of these guys since the value of them continues to increase each and every season.

I would have no problem keeping the roster at the same starting number, but would not allow the flex position to be used for a third running back. Do the math,
and see what I mean.

#22 pmoe33

pmoe33

    FF Rookie

  • Members
  • 31 posts

Posted 09 August 2005 - 02:27 PM

So what would the choices for the flex spot be then? Just WR or TE?

#23 Evil number

Evil number

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 712 posts

Posted 09 April 2006 - 02:54 PM

hi