Bucs acquired Jason Pierre-Paul and a fourth-round pick from the Giants in exchange for a third-round pick and a fourth-round pick.
Wow... They also cut DRC. I loved the Solder signing, but the rest of this off-season has me scratching my head.
Posted 22 March 2018 - 08:50 AM
Bucs acquired Jason Pierre-Paul and a fourth-round pick from the Giants in exchange for a third-round pick and a fourth-round pick.
Wow... They also cut DRC. I loved the Solder signing, but the rest of this off-season has me scratching my head.
Posted 22 March 2018 - 09:11 AM
Posted 22 March 2018 - 09:11 AM
Does this mean now that the Giants are drafting Chubb?
Posted 22 March 2018 - 10:29 AM
This is to free up for OBJ next season
Posted 22 March 2018 - 11:17 PM
Posted 23 March 2018 - 06:21 AM
Posted 23 March 2018 - 08:04 AM
I don't think Denver is taking a QB.
I think they could potentially take one if the one they like falls to them here, but I don't think they'll move up to get one. I think if any team deals with the Giants it will be the Bills. If the Giants aren't going QB this year, they have so many needs it would make sense to take Buffalo's 2 #1's and get some OL help.
Posted 23 March 2018 - 08:26 AM
I think they could potentially take one if the one they like falls to them here, but I don't think they'll move up to get one. I think if any team deals with the Giants it will be the Bills. If the Giants aren't going QB this year, they have so many needs it would make sense to take Buffalo's 2 #1's and get some OL help.
You could be right. I'd say your scenario of taking a QB if one falls to them, is much more likely than them trading up to get one. I believe that the odds on favorite are of them taking Chubb, Barkley, or Ward.
Posted 24 March 2018 - 02:11 AM
Posted 24 March 2018 - 09:53 AM
They need to take Barkley.
Posted 24 March 2018 - 10:59 AM
Posted 24 March 2018 - 11:37 AM
Yes indeed they do need to take him, and it would be a disappointment too Gmen fans if they do not.
Thanks for the reply.
Posted 24 March 2018 - 12:06 PM
Taking Barkley would definitely help the Giants be in position for a top pick again next year for sure. Making poor decisions with top draft picks can really help a bad team stay bad.Yes indeed they do need to take him, and it would be a disappointment too Gmen fans if they do not.
Thanks for the reply.
Posted 24 March 2018 - 12:35 PM
Taking Barkley would definitely help the Giants be in position for a top pick again next year for sure. Making poor decisions with top draft picks can really help a bad team stay bad.
Then next year when they pick 1st overall, they can get the best punter at #1, then earn another top pick the following year. Do this until Manning finally leaves. Then they can start over completely and try to build a solid team.
Go Ramblers.
I don't think drafting Barkley would hurt the Giants. I think with Barkley they're in position to win 10+ games. That said, I think they're drafting Chubb.
Posted 24 March 2018 - 01:11 PM
Maybe they should take him? Not need.
Posted 24 March 2018 - 01:13 PM
Taking Barkley would definitely help the Giants be in position for a top pick again next year for sure. Making poor decisions with top draft picks can really help a bad team stay bad.
Then next year when they pick 1st overall, they can get the best punter at #1, then earn another top pick the following year. Do this until Manning finally leaves. Then they can start over completely and try to build a solid team.
Go Ramblers.
Posted 24 March 2018 - 01:31 PM
Wayne Gallman was drafted last year as was Davis Webb
Giants shound trade down a bit and take the pass rusher or trade down a bit mire and get one of the top o-linemen.
Posted 24 March 2018 - 01:32 PM
Posted 24 March 2018 - 01:36 PM
Posted 24 March 2018 - 01:47 PM
Posted 24 March 2018 - 05:08 PM
Posted 24 March 2018 - 07:01 PM
Yes they should, because they need too.
They lack any since of a rb1, and Barkley can help create instead help, which would help Manning and that entire offence.
Posted 24 March 2018 - 10:03 PM
Yeah, but it's not a need.
Posted 25 March 2018 - 09:33 AM
I think they could be a playoff team with a player like Barkley
Posted 25 March 2018 - 11:02 AM
Dallas missed the playoffs last year solely because Elliott was out 6 games. There are some RB's who are legit difference makers.And what without Barkley? The only position that is worth multiple extra wins is QB.
If the Giants are favored by 3 and Barkley randomly is out for the week, the ljne would hardly move. Maybe to 2.5.
Giants should start over and not ###### around
Posted 25 March 2018 - 12:32 PM
Dallas missed the playoffs last year solely because Elliott was out 6 games. There are some RB's who are legit difference makers.
If Lev Bell says "screw it" and retires, the Steelers will have a losing record. With him,they are a Super Bowl contender.
Dallas lost 3 of their first 5 games with Elliott playing. Those games count too. There is no way to tell that they would have made the playoffs if he wasn't suspended. Plus, the Dallas o-line was, and still is, light years ahead of the Giants..
Posted 25 March 2018 - 02:10 PM
Posted 25 March 2018 - 04:31 PM
As a fan of the team, I think they cant make a bad choice here.
Posted 25 March 2018 - 06:31 PM
And what without Barkley? The only position that is worth multiple extra wins is QB.
If the Giants are favored by 3 and Barkley randomly is out for the week, the ljne would hardly move. Maybe to 2.5.
Giants should start over and not ###### around
Posted 26 March 2018 - 12:08 AM
It's good to know that every year the top picks in the draft are a sure homerun no matter who gets picked.
Posted 26 March 2018 - 05:03 AM
You're a dumbass. I'm talking strategy, anyone can see that. But you got your unfunny, unoriginal quip in.
Posted 26 March 2018 - 07:41 AM
Posted 26 March 2018 - 08:35 AM
HT does your user name have anything to do with the musician Steve Earl?
Posted 26 March 2018 - 08:37 AM
Your strategy was, "they can't make a bad choice here". That is not true.
Posted 26 March 2018 - 10:12 AM
Can't listen to non Giants fans about this upcoming draft. As a fan of the team, I think they cant make a bad choice here. QB, Barkley, Chubb, trade down. They were 3-13, but a year removed from 11 wins with a numbskull at the helm. They either get a big time player for now or build for the the future. I'm good either way. But the rest of you are going to dog them no matter what. Enjoy.
Posted 26 March 2018 - 10:14 AM
That's impossible for you to even know how much a line would move if the Gmen had Barkely and he missed a game.
That's a really silly post.
Thanks for the reply.
Proverbs 22:4
Posted 26 March 2018 - 10:18 AM
Posted 26 March 2018 - 10:20 AM
They are 0-1 in playoff games over the past 6 years. Similar to a bunch of bad teams in the league. And that makes you perfectly content in their decision making and strategies? The team is a mess right now.The strategy they employ won't be wrong. Of course the player can bust. That has to be said? Stop being a nuge
Posted 26 March 2018 - 10:32 AM
Yeah actually when it comes too this issue of drafting Barkley I think your post was very silly.
Line moves, oh my soul please.
Move on now.
Psalm 126:5&6
Posted 26 March 2018 - 10:35 AM
They are 0-1 in playoff games over the past 6 years. Similar to a bunch of bad teams in the league. And that makes you perfectly content in their decision making and strategies? The team is a mess right now.
Ian Rappaport recently reported Beckham won't set foot on a football field unless he get's his new contract that he wants. So now the giants have a problem with him (on and off the field) as well as bad lines, old QB, no running game, etc. This team is not set up well.