edjr 5,547 Posted May 25, 2017 oh yeah, his statistics are super impressive, playing with and against the likes of these scrubs. https://www.boston.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Babe-Ruth-Braves-850x478$large.jpg Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alias Detective 1,179 Posted May 25, 2017 oh yeah, his statistics are super impressive, playing with and against the likes of these scrubs. https://www.boston.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Babe-Ruth-Braves-850x478$large.jpg Their hands. Look at the age on them. Wow. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 540 Posted May 25, 2017 And the fielders didn't even have modern looking gloves! No wonder his numbers were so good. ROFL Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vuduchile 1,940 Posted May 25, 2017 oh yeah, his statistics are super impressive, playing with and against the likes of these scrubs. https://www.boston.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Babe-Ruth-Braves-850x478$large.jpg That's like saying Sir Isaac Newton was a clown because other scientists during his time were so much dumber than scientists today. These guys accomplished way more with much less. Gimme today's training routines, steroids, Hubble telescopes, satellites, bats, balls and clubs and I'll take Newton, Ruth, Einstein, Cobb, and Bobby Jones vs. your Hawking, Bonds, Tyson, ARoid, and Tiger any day of the week. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,547 Posted May 25, 2017 you think Babe Ruth would have worked out if he were alive today Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vuduchile 1,940 Posted May 25, 2017 you think Babe Ruth would have worked out if he were alive today Maybe. Doctors used to smoke while giving you an exam. But we know better now don't we? But keep on dodging White Goodman. My point is solid and you have 0 regard for history or anyone who came before you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cruzer 1,992 Posted May 25, 2017 I agree... That's why I pointed out damn near 125 guys were hitting 714 hrs back then too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,547 Posted May 25, 2017 I agree... That's why I pointed out damn near 125 guys were hitting 714 hrs back then too. combined? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,547 Posted May 25, 2017 Maybe. Doctors used to smoke while giving you an exam. But we know better now don't we? But keep on dodging White Goodman. My point is solid and you have 0 regard for history or anyone who came before you. What's Pablo Sandovals excuse or Prince Fielder? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,479 Posted May 25, 2017 Mark Twain once commented that “to arrive at a just estimate of a renowned man’s character one must judge it by the standards of his time, not ours.” 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iam90sbaby 2,121 Posted May 25, 2017 Mark Twain once commented that “to arrive at a just estimate of a renowned man’s character one must judge it by the standards of his time, not ours.” Bingo. Drives me nuts when people lose sight of that. He was the best of his time, end of story. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,547 Posted May 25, 2017 Mark Twain once commented that “to arrive at a just estimate of a renowned man’s character one must judge it by the standards of his time, not ours.” Who? was he a golfer? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vuduchile 1,940 Posted May 25, 2017 Who? was he a golfer? You're done here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,547 Posted May 25, 2017 You're done here. I was done before I started. I was kidding anyway, I know he was NASCAR 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
supermike80 1,285 Posted May 25, 2017 Year Age Tm Lg G PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS 1921 26 NYY AL 152 693 540 177 204 44 16 59 168 17 13 145 81 .378 .512 .846 1.359 Babe Ruth's stat line from 1921. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,566 Posted May 25, 2017 did anyone else notice the whole team is wearing a Boston uniform while Babe is wearing a Braves uniform? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tanatastic 2,061 Posted May 25, 2017 Since sports changed so much with blacks and just athletes in general, you have to move the goalposts. It's unfair but you can't judge a guy based on his era, you have to judge him vs the best competition available. A huge black guy abusing white dock workers and chai smokers doesn't count. A batter smashing homers off of those pitchers with floppy hats and bugs bunny wind ups doesn't count. If they did, Otto Graham and Don Hutson should be considered the best qb and wr ever, but they are not. Babe was a fine player, but let's put him against the best pitchers of the last 30 years and see what happens. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,547 Posted May 25, 2017 Year Age Tm Lg G PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS 1921 26 NYY AL 152 693 540 177 204 44 16 59 168 17 13 145 81 .378 .512 .846 1.359 Babe Ruth's stat line from 1921. league average per team was 59 HR 9 teams didn't even hit 59 total. Buncha legends Ruth played against Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iam90sbaby 2,121 Posted May 25, 2017 Since sports changed so much with blacks and just athletes in general, you have to move the goalposts. It's unfair but you can't judge a guy based on his era, you have to judge him vs the best competition available. A huge black guy abusing white dock workers and chai smokers doesn't count. A batter smashing homers off of those pitchers with floppy hats and bugs bunny wind ups doesn't count. If they did, Otto Graham and Don Hutson should be considered the best qb and wr ever, but they are not. Babe was a fine player, but let's put him against the best pitchers of the last 30 years and see what happens. You've lost perspective, thats sad. Sports will continue to evolve and things will continue to change. I hope one day there isn't a debate if Tom Brady or Aaron Rodgers are ACTUALLY good players because now AI plays in the NFL or something crazy that is a paradigm shift in sports. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 540 Posted May 25, 2017 league average per team was 59 HR 9 teams didn't even hit 59 total. Buncha legends Ruth played against But I thought the pitching was so bad. Hmmm Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 540 Posted May 25, 2017 Jim Brown played against linebackers that would be safeties nowadays. I guess we should stop considering him at all time great. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,547 Posted May 25, 2017 1921 - 16 Teams 2458 games played 1273 complete games 2016 - 32 teams 4856 games played 83 complete games How fast did they throw back then? 75? A lot of Chad Pennington's back then case rested Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tanatastic 2,061 Posted May 25, 2017 Jim Brown played against linebackers that would be safeties nowadays. I guess we should stop considering him at all time great.Yea I agree, I already don't. We already had this discussion, I don't put Brown in my top 5rbs, there are just too many guys who played in the modern era that he can't touch. You have to have played during the Super Bowl era for me to count anything you did. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 540 Posted May 25, 2017 Yea I agree, I already don't. We already had this discussion, I don't put Brown in my top 5rbs, there are just too many guys who played in the modern era that he can't touch. You have to have played during the Super Bowl era for me to count anything you did. this is where you're wrong. The same goes for Babe Ruth. As times Change, they would change too. Year-round football as a kid. Camps. Advanced training techniques and supplementation. If you were the best player in the world, that's from Talent. And you would be great in any era. Jim Brown would do great against the defense is that Walter Payton played against. Or Emmitt Smith. Or Adrian Peterson. And Babe Ruth would be a monster of a hitter. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vuduchile 1,940 Posted May 25, 2017 1921 - 16 Teams 2458 games played 1273 complete games 2016 - 32 teams 4856 games played 83 complete games How fast did they throw back then? 75? A lot of Chad Pennington's back then case rested You should rest your brain. None of that is relevant. Again, people, equipment, training and knowledge have all evolved in step over time. You had to run the same distance to beat a throw to first in 1920 as you do now. But hitters and infielders have progressed at the same rate over time, so routine grounders are still close plays Ricky Henderson would have a quadrillion stolen bases if he was transported to 1900. In the year 3000 he wouldn't crack the top 10. I'd have thought someone who believes in evolution would get this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
supermike80 1,285 Posted May 26, 2017 1921 - 16 Teams 2458 games played 1273 complete games 2016 - 32 teams 4856 games played 83 complete games How fast did they throw back then? 75? A lot of Chad Pennington's back then case rested Ok troll Share this post Link to post Share on other sites