Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
HenryHill9323

Intel Community calling Obama's BS from 60 Minutes Interview.

Recommended Posts

Obama tried to throw them under the bus last night. Looks like they won't let that happen.

 

 

 

Obama has had accurate intelligence about ISIS since BEFORE the 2012 election, says administration insider
  • A national security staffer in the Obama administration said the president has been seeing 'highly accurate predictions' about the rise of the ISIS terror army since 'before the 2012 election'
  • Obama insisted in his campaign speeches that year that America was safe and al-Qaeda was 'on the run'
  • The president said during Sunday's '60 Minutes' program that his Director of National Intelligence had conceded he underestimated ISIS
  • But the administration aide insisted that Obama's advisers gave him actionable information that sat and gathered dust for more than a year
  • 'He knew what was at stake,' the aide said of the president, and 'he knew where all the moving pieces were'
  • Obama takes daily intelligence briefings in writing, he explained, because no one will be able to testify about warning the president in person about threats that the White House doesn't act on

 

 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2774122/Obama-accurate-intelligence-ISIS-BEFORE-2012-election-says-administration-insider.html#ixzz3EkV9SCrO
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dude, get a focking life.

Not surprising that you can't handle reality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obama tried to throw them under the bus last night. Looks like they won't let that happen.

 

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2774122/Obama-accurate-intelligence-ISIS-BEFORE-2012-election-says-administration-insider.html#ixzz3EkV9SCrO

Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

Thanks for the UK Enquirer Link and their STRONG unnamed national security staffer source. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Thanks for the UK Enquirer Link and their STRONG unnamed national security staffer source. :lol:

Hey...I do what I can :mad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not surprising that you can't handle reality.

 

Oh, I think he got reality just right...RP does need to get a life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Thanks for the UK Enquirer Link and their STRONG unnamed national security staffer source. :lol:

Agreed. Pretty pathetic that our own media won't do their job and it's the Limeys that do it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The party of no personal responsibility.

 

Passing the buck is expected.

Nothing to see here, move along.

 

It's probably a white cop or a team mascots fault anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Every poster here agrees that Obama is indefensible on this one. This might be a first.

Well, Newbie went after me and Frank Honcho went after the source reporting the news. I guess that's the best they have.

 

And Sho Nuff is still obsessed with RP, so he chimed in with his usual awesome insight on the subject at hand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe the fact Obama skips almost 60% of his Presidential Daily Briefings has something to do with him not knowing what the Intel Community was telling him.

 

 

 

 

A new Government Accountability Institute (GAI) report reveals that President Barack Obama has attended only 42.1% of his daily intelligence briefings (known officially as the Presidential Daily Brief, or PDB) in the 2,079 days of his presidency through September 29, 2014.

The GAI report also included a breakdown of Obama’s PDB attendance record between terms; he attended 42.4% of his PDBs in his first term and 41.3% in his second.

 

 

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014/09/29/Report-Obama-Has-Missed-Over-Half-His-Second-Term-Daily-Intel-Briefings

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe the fact Obama skips almost 60% of his Presidential Daily Briefings has something to do with him not knowing what the Intel Community was telling him.

 

 

 

 

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014/09/29/Report-Obama-Has-Missed-Over-Half-His-Second-Term-Daily-Intel-Briefings

That would explain why he always finds out about world events by seeing them on tv.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That would explain why he always finds out about world events by seeing them on tv.

:doh: :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing like looking at half of the facts...and I love how the "Government Accountability Institute" tries to sound all impartial by taking a name close to the GAO...but it is known as a right leaning organization.

 

 

Does he read the PDB (you know, the actual document prepared for this meeting)? Yes.

Does he attend the morning meeting with the National Security Advisors? Yes.

 

Clinton was more of a reader as well...Bush preferred being at those actual meetings. Obama attends when he has questions about what is in the actual briefing.

 

But that never stops the uninformed from frothing at the mouth (see the last 3 posts...)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing like looking at half of the facts...and I love how the "Government Accountability Institute" tries to sound all impartial by taking a name close to the GAO...but it is known as a right leaning organization.

 

 

Does he read the PDB (you know, the actual document prepared for this meeting)? Yes.

Does he attend the morning meeting with the National Security Advisors? Yes.

 

Clinton was more of a reader as well...Bush preferred being at those actual meetings. Obama attends when he has questions about what is in the actual briefing.

 

But that never stops the uninformed from frothing at the mouth (see the last 3 posts...)

Still deflecting the topic at hand I see.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hack

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing like looking at half of the facts...and I love how the "Government Accountability Institute" tries to sound all impartial by taking a name close to the GAO...but it is known as a right leaning organization.

 

 

 

Here is their mission statement:

 

TO INVESTIGATE AND EXPOSE CRONY CAPITALISM, MISUSE OF TAXPAYER MONIES,

AND OTHER GOVERNMENTAL CORRUPTION OR MALFEASANCE.

 

 

I guess you may be right since most libs support the things they are trying to stop.

Then again, when you look at their Newsroom page they have links to Huffingtonpost, CNN, 60 Minutes, and USA Today on the first page. Hardly bastions of right-wing extremists.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still deflecting the topic at hand I see.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hack

 

You mean by looking at the facts about the briefing rather than believing right wing hack writers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Does he read the PDB (you know, the actual document prepared for this meeting)? Yes.

Does he attend the morning meeting with the National Security Advisors? Yes.

 

Does he?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is their mission statement:

 

 

 

I guess you may be right since most libs support the things they are trying to stop.

Then again, when you look at their Newsroom page they have links to Huffingtonpost, CNN, 60 Minutes, and USA Today on the first page. Hardly bastions of right-wing extremists.

 

I know I shouldn't even try with you...but look at any search about the GAI...

Try wiki to start.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Accountability_Institute

 

Their president was the foreign policy advisor to Palin...he is a long time conservative.

But hey...you believed his mission statement rather than his full past huh.

 

And who was the writer getting the information out? Oh, thats right...his buddy Thiessen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does he?

 

Do you have any factual information from a credible source saying otherwise?

As I said...probably no reason to even try with you. You won't ever see the whole truth...just what your right win sources and TV ads want you to see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wiki. :overhead:

 

So, is the story inaccurate? Does he only attend about 40% of the PDBs or not? Unless you can show the story is inaccurate you are getting nothing done here beyond exposing your hackiness.

 

So, any evidence or just more defending Obama no matter what the facts are?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Do you have any factual information from a credible source saying otherwise?

As I said...probably no reason to even try with you. You won't ever see the whole truth...just what your right win sources and TV ads want you to see.

You made the claim, not me.

 

Is making some claim and then telling others they have to disprove it really the best you have?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wiki. :overhead:

 

So, is the story inaccurate? Does he only attend about 40% of the PDBs or not? Unless you can show the story is inaccurate you are getting nothing done here beyond exposing your hackiness.

 

So, any evidence or just more defending Obama no matter what the facts are?

 

I have never said he attends more...I am saying it does not tell the whole story.

Or is that too much information for you to comprehend.

BTW...do you have anything to prove what wiki stated was inaccurate?

 

The facts are that he gets the briefing (like every president) and that he attends the National Security meetings...that he does not always attend the intel briefing meetings but has the information in hand.

 

Time to do what I have done with the rest of your aliases...good bye.

Have fun being a hack whose only life is trolling this board.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

BTW...do you have anything to prove what wiki stated was inaccurate?

 

Other than their Newsroom that had reports from both liberal and conservative sources? The one that was right down the middle?

 

Nope. Nothing beyond that.......mostly because I have no inclination to keep looking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would take my briefings on writing too. For several reasons....

 

1. It forces the writer to be more thoughtful and deliberate, and not just pop of and tell me what I want to hear in the oval.

 

2. It creates a record.

 

3. I read a hell of a lot faster than people talk. As POTUS, my time is the most valuable thing I've got.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wiki. :overhead:

 

So, is the story inaccurate? Does he only attend about 40% of the PDBs or not? Unless you can show the story is inaccurate you are getting nothing done here beyond exposing your hackiness.

 

So, any evidence or just more defending Obama no matter what the facts are?

 

Well, Newbie went after me and Frank Honcho went after the source reporting the news. I guess that's the best they have.

 

And Sho Nuff is still obsessed with RP, so he chimed in with his usual awesome insight on the subject at hand.

 

:doh:

 

 

Wiki >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daily Mail.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have any factual information from a credible source saying otherwise?

As I said...probably no reason to even try with you. You won't ever see the whole truth...just what your right win sources and TV ads want you to see.

I haven't seen your source that says he does. Let''s start there

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would take my briefings on writing too. For several reasons....

 

1. It forces the writer to be more thoughtful and deliberate, and not just pop of and tell me what I want to hear in the oval.

 

2. It creates a record.

 

3. I read a hell of a lot faster than people talk. As POTUS, my time is the most valuable thing I've got.

I thinking reading the briefings, and then meeting with those who wrote them to ask questions, get clarifications, and ask for more details would be even better than just reading them on the turn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait, I'm a little out of the loop. Is this HenryHill moron the latest RP alias or a brand new, no-life politically obsessed loser?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Executive Chairman and co-founder of the GAI, Stephen Bannon, is the Executive Chairman of Breitbart News LLC, the parent company of Breitbart.com, a conservative news and opinion website, founded by conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart.

 

:lol: :lol: :lol:

 

Are you kidding me? Can I have "The epitome of biased sources" for a thousand, Alex?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Executive Chairman and co-founder of the GAI, Stephen Bannon, is the Executive Chairman of Breitbart News LLC, the parent company of Breitbart.com, a conservative news and opinion website, founded by conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart.

 

:lol: :lol: :lol:

 

Are you kidding me? Can I have "The epitome of biased sources" for a thousand, Alex?

 

Hey, now, calm down, or this Henry fella will start accusing you of being an alias of mine!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Executive Chairman and co-founder of the GAI, Stephen Bannon, is the Executive Chairman of Breitbart News LLC, the parent company of Breitbart.com, a conservative news and opinion website, founded by conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart.

 

:lol: :lol: :lol:

 

Are you kidding me? Can I have "The epitome of biased sources" for a thousand, Alex?

Another hack already tried this deflection.

 

Apparently you are unaware of the testimony of Intel officials in front of Congress saying ISIS would be doing exactly what it is now doing.....going back to Obama's "JV" days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another hack already tried this deflection.

 

Apparently you are unaware of the testimony of Intel officials in front of Congress saying ISIS would be doing exactly what it is now doing.....going back to Obama's "JV" days.

 

I just wanted to point out that your source is once again, worthless. You can't makes this sh!t up people. Like shooting fish in a barrel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's another Breitbart-type site and these Foxnews sheep fall for it hook, line, & sinker every single time. :doh: Dumbest portion of the country BY FAR.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just wanted to point out that your source is once again, worthless. You can't makes this sh!t up people. Like shooting fish in a barrel.

Just crying about who is reporting this proves nothing, hack.

 

 

President Obama admitted some failure in assessing and confronting the Islamic State before the group grew into a regional threat, telling 60 Minutes that U.S. intelligence had underestimated how rapidly the group could expand.

 

I think our head of the intelligence community, Jim Clapper, has acknowledged that, I think, they underestimated what had been taking place in Syria, Obama said.

 

But the intelligence community disagrees, saying that the White House was repeatedly warned about the Islamic State threat. Either the president doesnt read the intelligence hes getting or hes bulls***ing, a former Pentagon official told the Daily Beast on Sunday.

 

The Islamic State took the Iraqi city of Fallujah back in January, prompting warnings at the time that the jihadist threat could soon spiral out of control. Public testimony from the intelligence community soon after, in February and March, predicted that the group would soon try to seize more territory.

 

 

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/389073/obama-blames-intel-community-underestimating-isis-intel-community-begs-differ-brendan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait, I'm a little out of the loop. Is this HenryHill moron the latest RP alias or a brand new, no-life politically obsessed loser?

 

That is one of his...pretty sure he is using 2 right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×