phinsfan51 1 Posted November 14, 2017 Which shot in the dark has the best potential for playoff payoff... Bridgewater or Garropolo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Byrdman5 104 Posted November 14, 2017 I would say Teddy, better team and weapons. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 2,456 Posted November 14, 2017 Besides those two qbs, who else would be available? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ray_T 588 Posted November 15, 2017 I would say Teddy, better team and weapons. This and the coach seems to be pondering whether he can switch to Bridgewater. I dont think he will, but if Keenum slips up, I'm sure Bridgewater will get a shot. Garoppolo may yet have another two to three weeks before he gets a chance to play. and when he does, who can he throw to? can anyone on that team catch footballs? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bobjay00 22 Posted November 15, 2017 Who can predict that? Garrapolo unproven and the Bridgewater I remember sucked, Keenum looks better. Maybe the Bears will take the reins off Trubisky. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phinsfan51 1 Posted November 15, 2017 I have Brees and Bortles (drafted Rodgers but released after injury)... other available include: McCown, Brissett, Cutler, Winston, Flacco, Rodgers Just looking to fortify the QB spot moving into playoff time (where I have already clinched a spot) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 2,456 Posted November 15, 2017 Brissett no question Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lesman 1 Posted November 15, 2017 Brissett no question I agree with this. I'd rank them as Brissett, McCown, Bridgewater, Cutler IMO... I would rather take a flyer on Winston making it back for a playoff run before Garrapolo. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=472210 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
