Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Cdub100

"I plead the 5th" Susan Rice, John Brennan and Samantha Power

Recommended Posts

Oddhow yiu all and Trump whine about anonymous sources but are fine pedaling single anonymous sources.

 

:lol:

 

Your boy's legacy taking yet another hit. The only thing left is the abortion of Obamacare.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Your boy's legacy taking yet another hit. The only thing left is the abortion of Obamacare.

My boy huh?

 

Yeah...big hit based on Fox's single unnamed source.

I'm sure he is really sweating this out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My boy huh?

 

Yeah...big hit based on Fox's single unnamed source.

I'm sure he is really sweating this out.

 

I'm sure he's sweating all right. Running hither and yon, following in Bill's footsteps with enormous speaking fees. Wonder when Barry will get paid by the Russians? Or you think he'll stick with the Ukrainians? Saudis?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Trey Gowdy Votes To Appoint A Second Special Counsel To Investigate James Comey Hillary Clinton Barack Obama And Loretta Lynch Along With Susan Rice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Trey Gowdy Votes To Appoint A Second Special Counsel To Investigate James Comey Hillary Clinton Barack Obama And Loretta Lynch Along With Susan Rice

 

That was a laundry list of sh!t they're looking into and quite the list of people they're looking into.

 

It's about time they grew a set and start going after the real criminal organization a.k.a. the Democrats.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could put this about anywhere.

Buried in a Bloomberg article is this.

Not everyone agrees that what Rice did was improper. She was after all receiving much new intelligence about Russia's role in the election, some of which suggested coordination with Trump associates. National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster has concluded that Rice did nothing wrong, according to two U.S. intelligence officials who spoke to me on condition of anonymity. That might explain why Trump has yet to declassify more information on the prior administration's unmasking requests.

 

 

 

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-08-03/you-can-thank-leakers-for-new-russia-sanctions

And of course now McMasters is getting the business from idiots like Cernovich and the alt right. I'd bet in McMasters in that fight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Slo trying to difuse McMasters bomb.

 

McMasters in April, unbeknownst to Trump gave Susan Rice continued access to Top Secret info she accessed during her tenure. He took away the Need to Know requirement.

 

Why would that be necessary? :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trumps guy says she didn't do wrong...Filthy don't care...not a shock.

McCain recommended***

 

Why would she still need access?

 

Why does McMasters block then fire a guy (his deputy) for wanting to brief Trump on plan that could cancel Iran deal?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Poor Slo.....

 

Can't answer a simple question. Forgot your lithium again?

You want me to answer why someone else did something.

Think about that for a minute...then realize your question was idiotic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You want me to answer why someone else did something.

Think about that for a minute...then realize your question was idiotic.

:lol:

 

You seem to know why people say/do things all the time. Everytime Trump does something you assume it's a crime.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

McMasters gave her the ability to access documents she created or had part in to defend herself in the upcoming trial.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://twitter.com/MoMeetsAisha/status/893772808454639616

 

Lynch used the alias Elizabeth Carlisle to conduct illegal activity while Attorney General.

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/lynch-1.jpg?w=640&h=597

 

"AG Lynch -

 

We are holding on the statement for now."

 

Translation: Let's stick with the bullsh!t about talking to Bill Clinton about children.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I want to know now is how many other politicians and government figures are using aliases to communicate?

Particularly relevant given the amount of inside leaks...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kimdotcom :lol:

Conservative Treehouse

:lol:

 

What was illegal about those statements?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kimdotcom :lol:

Conservative Treehouse

:lol:

 

What was illegal about those statements?

 

What was the purpose of alias email if not to hide her identity? And to that point, why hide your identity if everything is on the up and up? :doh:

 

Some dumba$$ (assuming naming her wasn't intentional) forked up and put 'AG Lynch' in there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So...nothing then.

And still laughing at getting anythjngbfrom those sources...and yiu all complain about CNN is what is laughable in it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So...nothing then.

And still laughing at getting anythjngbfrom those sources...and yiu all complain about CNN is what is laughable in it.

 

Title of email chain she was in "Talking Points/Statement"................... Yeah.........there was nothing nefarious with her meeting Bill Clinton. I guarantee the investigation won't go too far. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Title of email chain she was in "Talking Points/Statement"................... Yeah.........there was nothing nefarious with her meeting Bill Clinton. I guarantee the investigation won't go too far. :lol:

Oh...talking points...I remember that law.

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So...nothing then.

And still laughing at getting anythjngbfrom those sources...and yiu all complain about CNN is what is laughable in it.

 

Because I have to continually school you on government law let me help again. It is illegal for the AG to have an alias like this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Because I have to continually school you on government law let me help again. It is illegal for the AG to have an alias like this.

Continually implies you have ever schooled me in that or anything at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Face it Slo.............in a battle of wits, you're totally unarmed.

Leave em holstered and still kick the out of you two.

 

Also...find a real source for any of that ...and then, investigate her all you want. Probably a reason only conspiracy whackjob sites are running that story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The story is breaking and a source you find credible (CNN) might not cover it for weeks, months if ever. They're finally starting to cover Imran Awan after all these months. :wave:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The story is breaking and a source you find credible (CNN) might not cover it for weeks, months if ever. They're finally starting to cover Imran Awan after all these months. :wave:

I find CNN far more credible than kimdotcom and conservative Treehouse...because they are. It's not even debatable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find CNN far more credible than kimdotcom and conservative Treehouse...because they are. It's not even debatable.

 

http://www.cnn.com/search/?q=awan

 

1 video link (no story) about an Ex-Dem Aide arrested trying to leave country. He was still an aide when arrested (so they're lying) and no coverage at all of the crimes concerning unauthorized access of House Servers.

 

Credible? :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

http://www.cnn.com/search/?q=awan

 

1 video link (no story) about an Ex-Dem Aide arrested trying to leave country. He was still an aide when arrested (so they're lying) and no coverage at all of the crimes concerning unauthorized access of House Servers.

 

Credible? :lol:

Kimdotcom is part of the bogus Seth Rich conspiracy...yes...CNN is more credible than that. FoxNews runs fake all the time and is basically state run media with this administration. Yes...still more credible than that too.

 

And as usual...still stuck in the awan non story. Is Fox still the only one running with that BS?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×