Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
drobeski

Q Anon, legit insider or fake ?

Recommended Posts

 

You sure are...you know your narratives have been crumbling bit by bit...you may have to admit you were duped by a bunch of con men and supported absolute corruption and believed in bogus conspiracy theories.

But you won't ever admit that...

I've never believed in the Russian collusion illusion, that's for sore losing fruitcake conspiracy theorists like you and wiff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never believed in the Russian collusion illusion, that's for sore losing fruitcake conspiracy theorists like you and wiff.

 

I know you never believed in something that actually has a factual basis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So far we have a LOT of predictions from this crazy person in this thread. How many of these have come true?

 

  1. Activation codes
  2. JFK style assassination plot
  3. One of the Rothschild's committing suicide (the only one that had a date set with it that has passed, didn't happen)
  4. Hillary's head is gonna roll because they found her emails
  5. "Something" coming about Ginsburg (then it being her resignation, then she is in cahoots with big pharma hiding the cure for cancer)
  6. The "end is near" for people who are "in front of the camera who scream the loudest" (who exactly would this be?)
  7. NSA has a killbox with a traffic cam setup on it with a warning of an upcoming attack (nevermind the fact that the NSA wouldn't put something they wanted hidden on the public internet)
  8. We'll find out Hillary was selling SAPs

When do these start coming true? How long are you going to wait with them not happening before you stop believing crap he posts?

 

I've missed the last few pages. Has all this stuff you guys said was going to happen, happened yet? Or did you guys realize this Q guy is posting tons of random crap, hoping you guys go back and make some weak association to one of the thousands of posts he's made every time an event happens? The guy spouts line after line of random nonsense which you guys predict will be X. Later on, Y happens and you point back to the random nonsense he posted saying that was what he was saying, completely ignoring that he made 5 other statements with that tweet that still make zero sense. JFC you guys are crazy over this dude.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1014600936017125376.html

 

If you need proof QANON is legit.

 

 

"We have the server" might be referring to the House Dem server that was stolen (the one Awan brothers hacked)

 

 

I've missed the last few pages. Has all this stuff you guys said was going to happen, happened yet? Or did you guys realize this Q guy is posting tons of random crap, hoping you guys go back and make some weak association to one of the thousands of posts he's made every time an event happens? The guy spouts line after line of random nonsense which you guys predict will be X. Later on, Y happens and you point back to the random nonsense he posted saying that was what he was saying, completely ignoring that he made 5 other statements with that tweet that still make zero sense. JFC you guys are crazy over this dude.

 

Read that thread.........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never believed in the Russian collusion illusion, that's for sore losing fruitcake conspiracy theorists like you and wiff.

Nailed it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Q has been quiet but he's back today. God Bless America! WWG1WGA!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does FOIA cover FISA?

No.

[FISA highest level of CLAS]

How did FOIA generate redacted FISA [Page]?

DECLAS.

Who DECLAS?

Section 5.2 CLAS [Office of President]

Why redacted?

Think HUBER.

WWG1WGA!

Q

 

 

Interesting point.

 

NFW does the FISA application drop unless it's declassified.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Read that thread.........

 

I read what I could of that page. Maybe I'm doing something wrong but there is focking tiny and if you expand it, blurry as hell. For the 4 pieces of "evidence":

 

Evidence 1. The graphic was too small to read in a lot of parts (and got blurry as hell when increasing the size). The first two sections (the "start here" and the one with the arrow next to it) reference the "fog of war" and since the next article had the word fog in it, it's a clear connection. Section 3 was too small to read. 4 appeared to be an article that NK was willing to negotiate nuclear weapons, although the rest of the section I couldn't read. Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 were too small to read. 11 was a selfie of Un but you could not read the QAnon post. 11 and 12 were too small to read. 13 was a google image search of the building that appears in section 8 and in text in section 12. The summary is too small to read.

 

Evidence 2. Q posted in December that contained term #2 and 19. Used a foxnews article to point out #2. 3 months later McCabe (the #2 at the FBI) was fired and there is a tweet about 19 people at the FBI being fired although when trying to verify that myself, all I could find was McCabe stuff. Is there a list somewhere of the other 18 people who were fired or are you taking a tweet as evidence? What do the other 6 lines in Qs original post mean?

 

Evidence 3. Q used the word "FIRE" in a post and then weeks later there was a fire at one of the Clinton houses. There was some random stuff about a scif and some dude helping send faxes and the word "server" is highlighted a couple of times. This is stretching it to say the least.

 

Evidence 4. Q and Trump made the same spelling mistake so clearly Q is Nostradamus.

 

 

It's crazy to think this is some sort of group of generals with inside info trying to overthrow the deep state via twitter. This account throws a TON of crap at the wall and occasionally some sticks (or can be somehow linked to sticking under the right conditions in retrospect). There's so much going on that I could throw out 10 predictions a day and hit on one every month if I followed politics as closely as you all do. Even if this dude was 100% on every prediction he made, what the fock good is that doing against the deep state? Like focking twitter is going to be the downfall of an uber-powerful illuminati organization.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Media is starting to lose their over Q. Already prepping the public for a false flag.

 

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/qanon-conspiracy-real-life_us_5b54bbafe4b0b15aba8fe484

 

Just like they did with #pedogate (send a literal IMDB actor in to shoot the computer server in the hallway closet, paint it as some deranged alt-right gun nut looking for a basement full of kid :lol:) they will commit violent acts "in the name of Q".

 

I predict we get a Q false flag in the month of August.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I've kinda given up on this qanon thing. Too cryptic to where he can later claim anything. Whoever it is is very smart....very creative but I lean towards also full of crap as far as having Intel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://qanon.pub/?#1687

 

All for a baseless conspiracy?
Enjoy the show!
Sample [2]
https://twitter.com/NBCNightlyNews/status/1019744881844113408
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/qanon-conspiracy-real-life_us_5b54bbafe4b0b15aba8fe484
https://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/massachusetts-senate-candidate-shiva-ayyadurai-spreads-qanon-conspiracy-theory/
https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/fringe-conspiracy-theory-qanon-there-s-plenty-merch-sale-amazon-n892561
https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2018/07/15/gop-twitter-account-helping-spread-baseless-internet-conspiracy-theory-qanon/220677
https://www.thedailybeast.com/what-is-qanon-the-craziest-theory-of-the-trump-era-explained
Something BIG is about to DROP.
Q

 

(interesting the fake news is finally starting to cover q; no surprise they try to portray q as some sort of alt-right nazi :lol: )

 

 

 

https://qanon.pub/?#1688

 

There is no greater [current] threat to the American people than the FAKE NEWS MEDIA.
#ControlledMSM
Study Nazism.
Compare/contrast ANTIFA.
Compare/contrast SOCIALISM push.
Push for REBIRTH.
Who financed then?
Who is financing now?
Dark to LIGHT.
GOOD WINS.
Q

 

 

 

 

BOOM! I expect a strong push by the blue check twitter bots over the next week attacking Q. And Q related false flag event in August. Dey scurred.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fake news is you...and your thread about Podesta that yiu predictably now avoid.

 

Q and his followers are morons. Well he probably isnt a moron...smart enough to get a bunch of idiots to believe ridiculous conspiracy theories.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fake news is you...and your thread about Podesta that yiu predictably now avoid.

 

Q and his followers are morons. Well he probably isnt a moron...smart enough to get a bunch of idiots to believe ridiculous conspiracy theories.

like the Russian collusion illusion? Who got you to believe that nonsense? Was it Maxine or Schiff?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

like the Russian collusion illusion? Who got you to believe that nonsense? Was it Maxine or Schiff?

You just keep trying drobeski...but it wont make your point true.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Q and his followers are morons. Well he probably isnt a moron...smart enough to get a bunch of idiots to believe ridiculous conspiracy theories.

 

So Q is to us what Clapper, Brennan and Comey is to you idiots that bought into and still believe in the Russian Collusion angle?

 

At least there is evidence supporting the Q stuff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fake news is you...and your thread about Podesta that yiu predictably now avoid.

 

Q and his followers are morons. Well he probably isnt a moron...smart enough to get a bunch of idiots to believe ridiculous conspiracy theories.

You support pedos and treasonous anti American pigs. We support Patriots.
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I've kinda given up on this qanon thing. Too cryptic to where he can later claim anything. Whoever it is is very smart....very creative but I lean towards also full of crap as far as having Intel.

 

This is it. You guys so want this to be true that you're letting it cloud your vision as to how asinine it is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

This is it. You guys so want this to be true that you're letting it cloud your vision as to how asinine it is.

 

Is the FISA application that was released last Friday declassified? If so, link to it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Is the FISA application that was released last Friday declassified? If so, link to it?

 

I don't know. I don't follow this crap as closely as you guys do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I don't know. I don't follow this crap as closely as you guys do.

 

It has not been reported to have been declassified and just 'appeared' to Judicial Watch. Q has been saying for awhile some stuff has been declassified and it would appear he's correct. Even that redacted one could not have been released unless it was declassified.

 

More releases in the coming days/weeks to be sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It has not been reported to have been declassified and just 'appeared' to Judicial Watch. Q has been saying for awhile some stuff has been declassified and it would appear he's correct. Even that redacted one could not have been released unless it was declassified.

 

More releases in the coming days/weeks to be sure.

 

But Q has said 1000 other things that have not come true also. He's shooting a shotgun at a quarter. Most of the things he says are complete misses that you are ignoring because he hit the quarter with one of the pellets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

But Q has said 1000 other things that have not come true also. He's shooting a shotgun at a quarter. Most of the things he says are complete misses that you are ignoring because he hit the quarter with one of the pellets.

 

 

My guess is that he is a far left Antifa troll. I have been following what he has said for a while. He posts stuff that either reaffirm the beliefs of his followers or is so vague that it can be interpreted in any number of ways. I am waiting for a gotcha moment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

But Q has said 1000 other things that have not come true also. He's shooting a shotgun at a quarter. Most of the things he says are complete misses that you are ignoring because he hit the quarter with one of the pellets.

 

Also it didn't just appear to judicial watch...a totally different group one a FOIA request and Judicial Watch got it as well. Gizmodo I believe may have been the first...but other requests were filed by Judicial Watch, New York Times and USA Today

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

My guess is that he is a far left Antifa troll. I have been following what he has said for a while. He posts stuff that either reaffirm the beliefs of his followers or is so vague that it can be interpreted in any number of ways. I am waiting for a gotcha moment.

 

Id laugh if it was all more Sacha Baron Cohen trolling the dumbest of the dumb.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

My guess is that he is a far left Antifa troll. I have been following what he has said for a while. He posts stuff that either reaffirm the beliefs of his followers or is so vague that it can be interpreted in any number of ways. I am waiting for a gotcha moment.

 

I don't think it's anyone on the left at all. I think it's someone is a major conspiracy theorist who actually believes in all this stuff and is trying to "wake" everyone else (and someone who gets off on the attention).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I don't think it's anyone on the left at all. I think it's someone is a major conspiracy theorist who actually believes in all this stuff and is trying to "wake" everyone else (and someone who gets off on the attention).

This is old news, but wikileaks thinks that Qanon is a LARP troll, ie someone that is treating this whole thing as a game. Since wikileaks is in the business of actually posting real government inside stories they may have some credibility with this.

 

I still think it is someone on the far left though. Everything seems over the top and vague.

 

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1001139404805738498?lang=en

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

This is it. You guys so want this to be true that you're letting it cloud your vision as to how asinine it is.

I personally wasn't looking at it that way but I see how people could.

I was looking at it more for a little inside information if you could read between the lines. I'm apparently just too stupid to read between the lines. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

This is old news, but wikileaks thinks that Qanon is a LARP troll, ie someone that is treating this whole thing as a game. Since wikileaks is in the business of actually posting real government inside stories they may have some credibility with this.

 

I still think it is someone on the far left though. Everything seems over the top and vague.

 

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1001139404805738498?lang=en

Wiki posts the real documents...their analysis and opining is pretty weak and where they get into issues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wiki posts the real documents...their analysis and opining is pretty weak and where they get into issues.

 

So you are saying their opinion that Qanon is a troll is wrong..........

 

 

Why do you disagree with everything anyone says.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So you are saying their opinion that Qanon is a troll is wrong..........

 

 

Why do you disagree with everything anyone says.

No...Im saying wiki isnt as credible as some give them credit for. They are accurate when releasing documents...beyond that, not so much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No...Im saying wiki isnt as credible as some give them credit for. They are accurate when releasing documents...beyond that, not so much.

 

You are posting this in direct response to wikileaks opinion that Q anon is a troll. Since you stated your opinion twice in this same exact context then I can only infer that you disagree with their opinion and that you believe that Q anon is in fact not a troll, but posting real insider information.

 

There are only 2 other explanations, that you post so much on so many forums that you just do not pay attention to what you type or possibly that you like to disagree with everyone on everything.

 

 

 

It just blows my mind that you are coming in here and posting in that manner.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Also it didn't just appear to judicial watch...a totally different group one a FOIA request and Judicial Watch got it as well. Gizmodo I believe may have been the first...but other requests were filed by Judicial Watch, New York Times and USA Today

 

How is a highly classified document that's been withheld from HIC but was released UNREDACTED to SSCI (thus Senate Staffer James Wolfe busted in leak hunt) suddenly gets released without anyone announcing it's been declassified? Therefore it must have been declassified.

 

Wiki posts the real documents...their analysis and opining is pretty weak and where they get into issues.

 

Says the Buzzfeed Believing Bozo.............. :doh:

 

Post a link where Wikileaks has EVER been wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You are posting this in direct response to wikileaks opinion that Q anon is a troll. Since you stated your opinion twice in this same exact context then I can only infer that you disagree with their opinion and that you believe that Q anon is in fact not a troll, but posting real insider information.

 

There are only 2 other explanations, that you post so much on so many forums that you just do not pay attention to what you type or possibly that you like to disagree with everyone on everything.

 

 

 

It just blows my mind that you are coming in here and posting in that manner.

I posted it in reply to your thoughts on wikis credibility (as their founder is about to be kicked out of the Ecuadorian embassy and handed over to British officials).

 

It blows my mind that you infer all those things I didnt come close to saying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

This is old news, but wikileaks thinks that Qanon is a LARP troll, ie someone that is treating this whole thing as a game. Since wikileaks is in the business of actually posting real government inside stories they may have some credibility with this.

 

I still think it is someone on the far left though. Everything seems over the top and vague.

 

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1001139404805738498?lang=en

 

Bro, wikileaks was compromised months ago. Not a single thing they have tweeted or released since at least January 2018 is the real wikileaks.

 

Keep up!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I posted it in reply to your thoughts on wikis credibility (as their founder is about to be kicked out of the Ecuadorian embassy and handed over to British officials).

 

It blows my mind that you infer all those things I didnt come close to saying.

You are focking insane. Go get help.
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are focking insane. Go get help.

No kidding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Bro, wikileaks was compromised months ago. Not a single thing they have tweeted or released since at least January 2018 is the real wikileaks.

 

Keep up!

I am aware that people that follow q anon believe that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>>2326287

 

FISA = START.

 

FISA = IMMEDIATE CONF OF ILLEGAL ACTS RE: SIGNERS.

 

FISA = IMMEDIATE CONF START OF HUSSEIN SPY CAMPAIGN TO RIG AN ELECTION WAS BASED ON FALSE INFO.

 

FISA = IMPLICATES HRC / D PARTY AS FEEDERS OF FALSE INFO W/ THE INTENT OF SECURING MSM + BLAST/INSURANCE.

 

FISA = IMPLICATES SENIOR MEMBERS OF UK MI5/6/SIS, US INTEL, WH, FVEY, R PARTY (CONGRESS/SENATE) OF KNOWN CORRUPTION IN EFFORT TO RETAIN POWER AND RIG ELECTION + SAFEGUARD EVENT(S) BY POLITICAL KILL TO ACT WHILE IN POWER GIVEN MSM FAKE PUSH RUSSIA NAR.

 

FISA = TIES MSM HEADS (TV/BEHIND/CORP) TO D PARTY OTHER FOREIGN HEADS OF STATE IN CO-OP STRATEGY.

 

FISA BRINGS DOWN THE HOUSE.

 

FOIA DOES NOT INCLUDE FISA.

 

DECLAS BY POTUS KEY PARTS THAT FACTUALLY DEMONSTRATE THE 'DIRTY' 'FAKE' DOSSIER WAS USED AS PRIMARY SOURCE TO SECURE HIGHEST LEVEL OF INTEL SPYING ON PRIMARY REPUBLICAN OPPONENT (+POST ELECTION (INTEL ASSETS FOR/DOM SPYING ON THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES)) FOR THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENCY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

 

LOGICAL THINKING.

 

PUBLIC AWARENESS - FISA/SPYING

 

FOUNDATION BUILT HUBER.

 

NO SPELLING ERRORS INTENDED - MOBILE / UNKNOWN IF ABOVE.

 

Q

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>>2326287

 

FISA = START.

 

FISA = IMMEDIATE CONF OF ILLEGAL ACTS RE: SIGNERS.

 

FISA = IMMEDIATE CONF START OF HUSSEIN SPY CAMPAIGN TO RIG AN ELECTION WAS BASED ON FALSE INFO.

 

FISA = IMPLICATES HRC / D PARTY AS FEEDERS OF FALSE INFO W/ THE INTENT OF SECURING MSM + BLAST/INSURANCE.

 

FISA = IMPLICATES SENIOR MEMBERS OF UK MI5/6/SIS, US INTEL, WH, FVEY, R PARTY (CONGRESS/SENATE) OF KNOWN CORRUPTION IN EFFORT TO RETAIN POWER AND RIG ELECTION + SAFEGUARD EVENT(S) BY POLITICAL KILL TO ACT WHILE IN POWER GIVEN MSM FAKE PUSH RUSSIA NAR.

 

FISA = TIES MSM HEADS (TV/BEHIND/CORP) TO D PARTY OTHER FOREIGN HEADS OF STATE IN CO-OP STRATEGY.

 

FISA BRINGS DOWN THE HOUSE.

 

FOIA DOES NOT INCLUDE FISA.

 

DECLAS BY POTUS KEY PARTS THAT FACTUALLY DEMONSTRATE THE 'DIRTY' 'FAKE' DOSSIER WAS USED AS PRIMARY SOURCE TO SECURE HIGHEST LEVEL OF INTEL SPYING ON PRIMARY REPUBLICAN OPPONENT (+POST ELECTION (INTEL ASSETS FOR/DOM SPYING ON THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES)) FOR THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENCY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

 

LOGICAL THINKING.

 

PUBLIC AWARENESS - FISA/SPYING

 

FOUNDATION BUILT HUBER.

 

NO SPELLING ERRORS INTENDED - MOBILE / UNKNOWN IF ABOVE.

 

Q

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×