NorthernVike 2,080 Posted February 2, 2015 WTF was that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mobb_deep 917 Posted February 2, 2015 Worst call ever. Wow. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 5,890 Posted February 2, 2015 WTF was that? That was the single worst play call I have ever seen in a situation of that magnitude in any sport, ever. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,080 Posted February 2, 2015 This HAS to be set up! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Old School 360 Posted February 2, 2015 Focking incredible. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 2,710 Posted February 2, 2015 Basically of all time, fkn idiots. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Saint Elistan 106 Posted February 2, 2015 Basically of all time, fkn idiots. Not to bring about any bad memories, but our fan base can't really comment. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 4,027 Posted February 2, 2015 As a Packer fan, who thought I saw the height of stupidity 2 weeks ago, I say, there is a new Stupid King in Town, long live the king. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 2,710 Posted February 2, 2015 Not to bring about any bad memories, but our fan base can't really comment. There is literally no comparison, worse call in Superbowl history, by a lot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
frank 2,144 Posted February 2, 2015 Let's not overreact. If it had worked, and it very nearly did, no one would be complaining. There's something to be said for not doing the predictable thing. I agree they should have run the ball, but nowhere near the worst call. The real mistake was Wilson throwing the ball unless it was really safe. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,080 Posted February 2, 2015 Let's not overreact. If it had worked, and it very nearly did, no one would be complaining. There's something to be said for not doing the predictable thing. I agree they should have run the ball, but nowhere near the worst call. The real mistake was Wilson throwing the ball unless it was really safe. Bullfuckingshit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 4,027 Posted February 2, 2015 Right now, someone is explaining to Wilson that INT's in the endzone AREN'T touchdowns. #MDJennings. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mobb_deep 917 Posted February 2, 2015 Let's not overreact. If it had worked, and it very nearly did, no one would be complaining. There's something to be said for not doing the predictable thing. I agree they should have run the ball, but nowhere near the worst call. The real mistake was Wilson throwing the ball unless it was really safe. Dumb Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 4,027 Posted February 2, 2015 I would have run it with Lynch, but I died. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Old School 360 Posted February 2, 2015 Well, Pete Carroll finally won a Superbowl for the Pats. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 3,310 Posted February 2, 2015 Patriots planted Pete Carroll in Seattle sleeper-cell style because, wait for it...they're focking cheaters!!! :cry: 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 4,558 Posted February 2, 2015 At the time I was devastated because I thought I needed a Marshawn TD there to win, but as it turned out that play didn't really matter after all. A lot of drama but it signified nothing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 5,194 Posted February 2, 2015 Let's not overreact. If it had worked, and it very nearly did, no one would be complaining. There's something to be said for not doing the predictable thing. I agree they should have run the ball, but nowhere near the worst call. The real mistake was Wilson throwing the ball unless it was really safe. Yeah but a play like that is never really safe with all of those bodies in there. I'd have been fine with a fake handout rollout sorta play. That play was just dumb. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FeelingMN 273 Posted February 2, 2015 Very surprised they didn't read option down there....or bootleg with Wilson having the option to run/throw. But up to that point they did well in the red zone. Just didn't execute. Great game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cloaca du jour 2,064 Posted February 2, 2015 Let's not overreact. If it had worked, and it very nearly did, no one would be complaining. There's something to be said for not doing the predictable thing. I agree they should have run the ball, but nowhere near the worst call. The real mistake was Wilson throwing the ball unless it was really safe. This +1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mighty_thor 115 Posted February 2, 2015 Yeah but a play like that is never really safe with all of those bodies in there. I'd have been fine with a fake handout rollout sorta play. That play was just dumb. I was really waiting for a rollout with an option to pass or run it. Seattle really mismanaged the clock. They had to burn a timeout on the miracle catch with the clock already stopped but the play clock was running down. Then after lynch ran the ball to the 1 they let a ton of time run off the clock before throwing the int. proper clock management and they could have had three runs from the 1. Carroll's excuse was that they no longer had time to run it 3 times so he was going to throw once and would have run the next 2 downs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,562 Posted February 2, 2015 Let's not overreact. If it had worked, and it very nearly did Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted February 2, 2015 They had one TO so they wanted to pass on 2nd down so they could run on 3rd. I get that. But why not use Wilson on the option. It should have been a roll out run option. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 824 Posted February 2, 2015 I was shocked they passed it obviously... But after thinking for a moment...with only 1 timeout left... If they pass on 2nd down they have 3 chances to score. And they can run or pass on the next 2.......If they run on 2nd down, they lose their last timeout, so it's 100% pass on the next play. Maybe the specific pass play was bad, but passing was the right call. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 4,558 Posted February 2, 2015 I was shocked they passed it obviously... But after thinking for a moment...with only 1 timeout left... If they pass on 2nd down they have 3 chances to score. And they can run or pass on the next 2.......If they run on 2nd down, they lose their last timeout, so it's 100% pass on the next play. Maybe the specific pass play was bad, but passing was the right call. There was plenty of time for four running plays but they took forever to line up after miracle catch and burned a ton of time. Then when they did line up on 2nd down it was in shotgun. Given the time when the snap occurred and their clock management and shotgun formation, they forced themselves/ telegraphed that they wanted to pass and clearly didn't fool Bellichick. They had the Pats by the balls but the Seahawks got too cute and completly deserved to lose due to poor play calling. Fock 'em. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted February 2, 2015 Maybe the specific pass play was bad, but passing was the right call. I think history and cooler heads will see this to be right. Chris Collinsworth was speaking too much about it, so casual fans got a bit swayed. The reality is that Seattle lost that game much earlier when they failed to get 1st downs and kill clock. Wilson really needs to take over when he is up 10. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 5,890 Posted February 2, 2015 The Seahawks had around 59 seconds left and a TO with the ball on the 1. That is more than enough time to run the ball on 2nd, 3rd and 4th (if necessary). In that situation you put the ball in the hands if your best offensive player (Lynch). If you really must throw from the run you call a bootleg run / pass option. What you don't do is have your QB throw the ball on a slant route right into traffic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
porkbutt 861 Posted February 2, 2015 idiotic. his ginorous ego imploded Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 3,310 Posted February 2, 2015 I think a little bit of what happened was everyone was expecting Belichick to call a timeout and then possibly let the Seahawks score on the next play. In fact everyone in my mom's basement was screaming at him to do just that (obviously we were wrong). So maybe it threw the Seahawks off a bit? Then when they realized how much of the clock was running off they said "oh sh!t, we better throw it!" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 2, 2015 The better team won. The cream rises to the top. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 824 Posted February 2, 2015 There was plenty of time for four running plays but they took forever to line up after miracle catch and burned a ton of time. Then when they did line up on 2nd down it was in shotgun. Given the time when the snap occurred and their clock management and shotgun formation, they forced themselves/ telegraphed that they wanted to pass and clearly didn't fool Bellichick. They had the Pats by the balls but the Seahawks got too cute and completly deserved to lose due to poor play calling. Fock 'em. If we stop focusing on the result and think about the game strategy.... Do you want to score with 55 seconds left to only go up 3, then give the ball to Brady with 2 timeouts? I think the optimal game strategy is to give yourself 4 cracks at scoring, and do so while making sure you have the ball last. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted February 2, 2015 If we stop focusing on the result and think about the game strategy.... Do you want to score with 55 seconds left to only go up 3, then give the ball to Brady with 2 timeouts? I think the optimal game strategy is to give yourself 4 cracks at scoring, and do so while making sure you have the ball last. Absolutely. Carroll's clock management was fine. One poor play call does not undo the fact that he did everything else right. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,083 Posted February 2, 2015 Y'all can sugar coat it all you want, throwing into the middle of the field in that situation is the worst play call in the history of sports. If you insist on throwing at the one focking yard line then you bootleg and throw to a pylon or if it's not there throw it away. Throwing a slant into the teeth of the defense on the one yard line was beyond dumb. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
frank 2,144 Posted February 2, 2015 Whatever the call, Wilson should have thrown it away unless it was wide open. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,083 Posted February 2, 2015 Whatever the call, Wilson should have thrown it away unless it was wide open. That's part of the problem. It's a timing route quick slant. Hike, 1 2 throw. There is no room for thinking on a play like that. Just reason number 68 why it was beyond awful. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 5,890 Posted February 2, 2015 Whatever the call, Wilson should have thrown it away unless it was wide open. You don't get "wide open" on a slant route thrown from the .5 yard line. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,080 Posted February 2, 2015 I think a little bit of what happened was everyone was expecting Belichick to call a timeout and then possibly let the Seahawks score on the next play. In fact everyone in my mom's basement was screaming at him to do just that (obviously we were wrong). So maybe it threw the Seahawks off a bit? Then when they realized how much of the clock was running off they said "oh sh!t, we better throw it!" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,083 Posted February 2, 2015 You don't get "wide open" on a slant route thrown from the .5 yard line. Reason #69 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 4,027 Posted February 2, 2015 Y'all can sugar coat it all you want, throwing into the middle of the field in that situation is the worst play call in the history of sports. If you insist on throwing at the one focking yard line then you bootleg and throw to a pylon or if it's not there throw it away. Throwing a slant into the teeth of the defense on the one yard line was beyond dumb. +1 According to Pete(who I think is full of BS and covering for Bevell), they brought in a spread formation, to spread Pats and then were going to run Lynch from that set. When Pats didn't bite, they went with pass play call. My reason for saying that's BS, was they didn't run a play from a spread. Also if he wanted to waste a down, throw to the pylon or back shoulder. That play, against packed in goal line defense is idiotic and IMO screams of Bevel trying to trick them. Problem, he absolutely didn't have the personnel at WR to pull that play off. Absolute dumb play call. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites