Comey: Idiot or poosay?

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

http://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrBT8d4oihZuMQApoFx.9w4;_ylu=X3oDMTE0bnRrcG50BGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMzBHZ0aWQDVUkyRkJUM18xBHNlYwNzcg--/RV=2/RE=1495864057/RO=10/RU=http%3a%2f%2fwww.businessinsider.com%2frussian-document-comey-clinton-email-probe-2017-5/RK=1/RS=38lzU42J6aFBWs5K558lvs0q__k-

 

So he unilaterally decides not to prosecute Hillary based in part by a Russian document suspected to be fake (that Clintons had Lynch in their pocket).

 

Was he duped by the phoney document or afraid?

[Sho Nuff 719]

That's what you took from that?

He was smart not to let a phony document affect his actual decision and to make sure it didn't affect the appearance or possibility of appearance of favoritism by Lynch.

 

In addition...just more evidence of Russian involvement in our politics which was all a part of the measures they took.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Comey failed to prosecute despite acknowledging HRC acted criminally (criminally in the fact others have been prosecuted for the things she did).

 

So the Russians did interfere with election by making Comey either afraid or a sucker.

[Sho Nuff 719]

Comey failed to prosecute despite acknowledging HRC acted criminally (criminally in the fact others have been prosecuted for the things she did).

 

So the Russians did interfere with election by making Comey either afraid or a sucker.

He acknowledged she acted carelessly...where did he claim criminally?

 

They interfered by ways of disinformation on many levels. )Trump and his campaign were caught using know bogus Russian propaganda multiple times too...note...I'm not saying that is proof of collusion...just their stupidity and yes hilarious how much actual fake news they fell for.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

http://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrBT8d4oihZuMQApIFx.9w4;_ylu=X3oDMTE0bGhyaDE4BGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDVUkyRkJUM18xBHNlYwNzcg--/RV=2/RE=1495864057/RO=10/RU=http%3a%2f%2fwww.rawstory.com%2f2017%2f05%2fcomey-knew-russian-clinton-lynch-documents-were-fake-but-acted-on-them-anyway-report%2f/RK=1/RS=0JL0ISEyspHYwBqY7eh9.2I4ixY-

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

http://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrBT8d4oihZuMQAp4Fx.9w4;_ylu=X3oDMTE0ZWM3a3VoBGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwM0BHZ0aWQDVUkyRkJUM18xBHNlYwNzcg--/RV=2/RE=1495864057/RO=10/RU=http%3a%2f%2fwww.foxnews.com%2fpolitics%2f2017%2f05%2f24%2fcomey-influenced-by-bogus-russian-document-report-says.html/RK=1/RS=gw22LVoeaxj3jCh_XfWAC9g8zgE-

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

So the Russians actually helped Hillary...... time for a special prosecutor

[Sho Nuff 719]

So the Russians actually helped Hillary...... time for a special prosecutor

Helped her? Focking crap your comprehension is so weak.

Psst...they were trying to make her look awful. Comey knew the reports were bogus and didn't let that effect what he was doing. It only influenced when he announced and that he kept it from Lynch to keep that appearance of wrongdoing by her out of it.

 

His fear was the mouth breathers like you would think it was real.

[Cdub100 3,380]

He acknowledged she acted carelessly...where did he claim criminally?

 

They interfered by ways of disinformation on many levels. )Trump and his campaign were caught using know bogus Russian propaganda multiple times too...note...I'm not saying that is proof of collusion...just their stupidity and yes hilarious how much actual fake news they fell for.

"Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."

 

https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

 

That bold part is a crime per Section 793 (f)

 

[f] Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

[Patriotsfatboy1 1,432]

[Sho Nuff 719]

"Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."

 

https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

 

That bold part is a crime per Section 793 (f)

 

[f] Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

Only no...being careless was not deemed a crime by the DOJ and I notice the current group also has not deemed it so.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,631]

Only no...being careless was not deemed a crime by the DOJ and I notice the current group also has not deemed it so.

No, the DOJ kicked it back to the FBI. Get your facts straight homegirl.

[Cdub100 3,380]

Only no...being careless was not deemed a crime by the DOJ and I notice the current group also has not deemed it so.

 

It's right there. Did you read it? People have been found guilty using this very charge.

 

Then again we are talking about "rules for thee, but not for me" Hillary Clinton

[Sho Nuff 719]

 

It's right there. Did you read it? People have been found guilty using this very charge.

 

Then again we are talking about "rules for thee, but not for me" Hillary Clinton

I read it...you don't seem to comprehend what it says.

[Cdub100 3,380]

I read it...you don't seem to comprehend what it says.

 

You really are amazing.

[Sho Nuff 719]

 

You really are amazing.

It's not anyone else's fault that you made a bogus claim.

[Djgb13 2,338]

Wait...Sho is saying there's nothing wrong with what Hillary did with "extremely classified information" but talks SO much sh1t about Trumps handling of classified information that he should be impeached even though Tump declassify information as he sees fit but Hillary can't? Talk about your double standard and having your foot in your mouth.

 

 

Oof

[Sho Nuff 719]

Wait...Sho is saying there's nothing wrong with what Hillary did with "extremely classified information" but talks SO much sh1t about Trumps handling of classified information that he should be impeached even though Tump declassify information as he sees fit but Hillary can't? Talk about your double standard and having your foot in your mouth.

 

 

Oof

So you can't read either?

Where did I say there was nothing wrong?

I asked where Comey stated it was criminal...and correctly disagrees wit Him Cdubs pitiful attempt.

There is a difference between criminal and nothing wrong with it.

Also...where have I said should be impeached for handling of classified information?

 

You should try getting your facts straight before running your ignorant mouth.

[Djgb13 2,338]

So you can't read either?

Where did I say there was nothing wrong?

I asked where Comey stated it was criminal...and correctly disagrees wit Him Cdubs pitiful attempt.

There is a difference between criminal and nothing wrong with it.

Also...where have I said should be impeached for handling of classified information?

 

You should try getting your facts straight before running your ignorant mouth.

I think you need a look in the mirror. You're defending Hillary for the same thing Trump did. Only he has the authority to do it while she didn't. Stick to what you're good at baldy

[titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745]

I think you need a look in the mirror. You're defending Hillary for the same thing Trump did. Only he has the authority to do it while she didn't. Stick to what you're good at baldy

You are an intoxicating mixture of willful blindness and stupidity.

[Djgb13 2,338]

You are an intoxicating mixture of willful blindness and stupidity.

I think you've got me mixed up with yourself there bud. I admit both are wrong for doing it. I'm just calling out retards who are being biased and won't acknowledge it. So if you fall into that category then you are a retard my friend

[Sho Nuff 719]

I think you need a look in the mirror. You're defending Hillary for the same thing Trump did. Only he has the authority to do it while she didn't. Stick to what you're good at baldy

You should try again.

Nor did they do the same thing.

You should stick to running away kiddo...cause the whole lying thing, you suck at it.

[Djgb13 2,338]

You should try again.

Nor did they do the same thing.

You should stick to running away kiddo...cause the whole lying thing, you suck at it.

Sure baldy. That's why you get called out constantly by everyone for being an idiot. Just like I'm doing now. I guess it's true what they say about idiots.

[Sho Nuff 719]

Sure baldy. That's why you get called out constantly by everyone for being an idiot. Just like I'm doing now. I guess it's true what they say about idiots.

Yiu called me out by lying again about what I actually said and did. When called in it yiu fall back on your usual tactic... claiming what everyone else is supposedly doing or saying (you did the same while whining about newbie lately).

 

Go back above to where you jumped in here...read my reply...and answer my questions about your bogus claims. I know you won't...because that's your MO...make claims...get called on it...then run away claiming you don't feel like going back and forth.

 

I will even link the post for you

 

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=5942343

[Djgb13 2,338]

Yiu called me out by lying again about what I actually said and did. When called in it yiu fall back on your usual tactic... claiming what everyone else is supposedly doing or saying (you did the same while whining about newbie lately).

 

Go back above to where you jumped in here...read my reply...and answer my questions about your bogus claims. I know you won't...because that's your MO...make claims...get called on it...then run away claiming you don't feel like going back and forth.

 

I will even link the post for you

 

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=5942343

Are you special needs? Serious question. Cause you have the intelligence of someone who is and if so I'll stop cause I don't want to be picking on someone with special needs. But if you aren't then you're just too stupid to understand that not once have I ever "ran" from you. I've told you repeatedly I'm not arguing with you care you're too stupid to carry a conversation with so I don't bother. The same applies to this situation. You defend Hillarys actions when she did the same thing Trump did. Only difference is Trump has the authority to do so whereas she didn't. It's a simple concept. You either grasp it or you don't. You don't seem to be grasping it. Therefore, I'm not going to waste my time anymore dealing with you. Of course, you will claim you "won" and that I'm "running away" when in fact anyone with the slightes shred of intelligence knows this not to be true and knows that it's pointless to argue with stupid

[Mungwater 588]

Wait...Sho is saying there's nothing wrong with what Hillary did with "extremely classified information" but talks SO much sh1t about Trumps handling of classified information that he should be impeached even though Tump declassify information as he sees fit but Hillary can't? Talk about your double standard and having your foot in your mouth.

 

 

Oof

I'm pretty sure only the originating agency can declassify documents.

[Sho Nuff 719]

Are you special needs? Serious question. Cause you have the intelligence of someone who is and if so I'll stop cause I don't want to be picking on someone with special needs. But if you aren't then you're just too stupid to understand that not once have I ever "ran" from you. I've told you repeatedly I'm not arguing with you care you're too stupid to carry a conversation with so I don't bother. The same applies to this situation. You defend Hillarys actions when she did the same thing Trump did. Only difference is Trump has the authority to do so whereas she didn't. It's a simple concept. You either grasp it or you don't. You don't seem to be grasping it. Therefore, I'm not going to waste my time anymore dealing with you. Of course, you will claim you "won" and that I'm "running away" when in fact anyone with the slightes shred of intelligence knows this not to be true and knows that it's pointless to argue with stupid

 

So...as usual, instead of answering the actual questions about your bullshit allegations. You make yet another ridiculous claim that I must be special needs.

Look...between you and the 90s kid trying to question my intelligence...I have gotten a good laugh.

You calling me stupid is just yet another dumb thing you do. I run circles around you when it comes to intelligence son...you are a focking brick wall of dumb.

I did not defend Hillary's actions. Nor did she do the same thing that he did. I did not do the things you are stating I did. Thats the focking point.

Read the conversation. I questioned whether Comey stated her actions were criminal. You state Im saying she did nothing wrong. That is a false claim by you.

You also claimed I stated Trump should be impeached for what he did...another false claim.

Its a simple concept...you make things up in order to argue...when called on it...you fall back on the "you are too dumb to talk to" BS when its obvious you can't even approach me when it comes to intelligence.

 

So again...back up your bogus claims...or basically just admit that you are not all that smart.

[cyclone24 1,814]

Sho getting tied to the tree again.

[Sho Nuff 719]

Sho getting tied to the tree again.

 

Maybe you can answer for the little liar...care to point out where I said what he claimed?

Not sure how you call that getting tied to a tree...by pointing out where Filthy, Cdub, and Dj were incorrect.

Are you that delusional?

[Cdub100 3,380]

Sho got whooped worse than usual in this thread. Sad

 

 

 

[Sho Nuff 719]

Sho got whooped worse than usual in this thread. Sad

 

 

 

Still waiting on your claim that Comey said she did something criminal.

It's odd how often you all claim someone got whooped after you all get called out for making bullshit claims....and then fail to back them up.

Seems to be the go to move.

Make something up.

Get called out.

Claim victory.

Rinse and repeat.

[Djgb13 2,338]

Typical Slo response. Which is why I don't bother arguing with the idiot. It's not worth it.

[Sho Nuff 719]

Typical Slo response. Which is why I don't bother arguing with the idiot. It's not worth it.

Yes...how dare I ask you all to back up your claims.

That is typical of me...expecting people can actually carry on a conversation without making things up.

[Djgb13 2,338]

Yes...how dare I ask you all to back up your claims.

That is typical of me...expecting people can actually carry on a conversation without making things up.

Uhuh. Sure Slo. Whatever you say buddy. You win

[Alias Detective 1,179]

Is there a both button?

[Sho Nuff 719]

Is there a both button?

Several

 

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showuser=195249

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showuser=6377

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showuser=68749

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showuser=72939

[iam90sbaby 2,125]

Sho might be the dumbest person in the world that is still able to operate a computer.

 

It's Saturday, why don't you go take care of the kids and let your wife have a night out? She worked hard this week.

[Sho Nuff 719]

Sho might be the dumbest person in the world that is still able to operate a computer.

 

It's Saturday, why don't you go take care of the kids and let your wife have a night out? She worked hard this week.

Impossible as I'm way smarter than you will ever be.

[drobeski 3,061]

He's corrupt, obviously. Talking about obstruction of justice. Would destroying evidence such as phones, laptops, servers and bleach bitting be considered obstruction under normal non corrupt circumstances ?

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

He's corrupt, obviously. Talking about obstruction of justice. Would destroying evidence such as phones, laptops, servers and bleach bitting be considered obstruction under normal non corrupt circumstances ?

Exactly.

 

Go back and look at him explaining why Hillary even though she's a lawyer didn't know she was committing a crime by destroying evidence.

 

He's just a freaking sock puppet for the clintons or acting as directed by Loretta Lynch.