RedzoneMonster 102 Posted October 27, 2016 It's likely going to be a timeshare mess, but who do you think has the most value rest of the way? Langford, Howard or Carey? If you HAD to pick one who would it be? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Franknbeans 46 Posted October 27, 2016 I just picked up Carey so I'll say him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kwolf68 13 Posted October 27, 2016 Yep, RB time share mess on a putrid team. I have Howard and may go shopping to see what I can get for him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kent 228 Posted October 27, 2016 I don't think Carey can stay healthy so it's Howard. Langford is so bad I think he sits when healthy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skinny_Bastard 154 Posted October 27, 2016 Langford. Thank me later. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skinny_Bastard 154 Posted October 27, 2016 I don't think Carey can stay healthy so it's Howard. Langford is so bad I think he sits when healthy. Howard and his horrible play the last 2 weeks? Doubt it. He already lost the job to backup Carey who Langford beat in camp. I saw Langford play a lot last year. He's one of the reason Forte was let go and Carey was 2nd string. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 2,459 Posted October 27, 2016 Neither. Coach Fox has a history of RBBC and this is what it's going to be going forward. Thanks for the post good question. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cavern 70 Posted October 27, 2016 The team's unofficial depth chart lists langford at 1, carey at 2, and howard at 3. go with langford if you need to stash one. the depth chart HAS been updated too (Hoyer has been removed). it's as good an indicator as anything as to who will get the lions share Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kent 228 Posted October 27, 2016 Howard and his horrible play the last 2 weeks? Doubt it. He already lost the job to backup Carey who Langford beat in camp. I saw Langford play a lot last year. He's one of the reason Forte was let go and Carey was 2nd string. But Langford this year is horrible. Can't break ANY tackles. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgcrawfish 232 Posted October 27, 2016 Neither. Coach Fox has a history of RBBC and this is what it's going to be going forward. Thanks for the post good question. This is probably the right answer. Fox had two of the better, more versatile backs in the league for years and effectively made both of them unusable at times. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skinny_Bastard 154 Posted October 27, 2016 But Langford this year is horrible. Can't break ANY tackles. Look at the defenses he played in the first 2 games. You going to judge a player base on 2 games to start the year?!?! If that's the case, why not take the 2 games he started last year? Those were some pretty awesome numbers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skinny_Bastard 154 Posted October 27, 2016 The team's unofficial depth chart lists langford at 1, carey at 2, and howard at 3. go with langford if you need to stash one. the depth chart HAS been updated too (Hoyer has been removed). it's as good an indicator as anything as to who will get the lions share I'm going to stick to what I've been saying. Grab Langford before it's too late. I can see all the Howard owners b!tch'n and moan'n seeing Langford line up in the backfield to start the game. Carey the back and Howard back to the bench... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kent 228 Posted October 27, 2016 I'm going to stick to what I've been saying. Grab Langford before it's too late. I can see all the Howard owners b!tch'n and moan'n seeing Langford line up in the backfield to start the game. Carey the back and Howard back to the bench... Sadly, the whole situation kills all of their value. Brutal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 2,459 Posted October 27, 2016 Even the coach of the Bears was talking about how awful Langford was looking before he was hurt. If Langford did not suffer an injury I think they would have gone to Howard anyway. His avg was 3.7 and last season it was only 3.6. They where going with a move. But as it has turn out Howard didn't do much better. Now you have a mess. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites