Federer > Woods

[drobeski 3,061]

Tennis majors same surface all major ...net doesn't move

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[edjr 5,563]

Never mind Tiger still 14, Federer 17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[edjr 5,563]

Tennis majors same surface all major ...net doesn't move

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I guess the ball and hole moves in golf

 

what's easier than to his a ball not moving?

[drobeski 3,061]

 

I guess the ball and hole moves in golf

 

what's easier than to his a ball not moving?

it doesn't ?

[drobeski 3,061]

14 >17 ? Or did they change that when they stopped relocating the pins every round ?

 

 

 

 

[edjr 5,563]

14 >17

 

[drobeski 3,061]

 

ok so a ranking of 14 is not greater than a ranking of 17 ?

Wut

 

 

 

 

 

[drobeski 3,061]

In a stadium same surface and conditions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tennis majors

 

 

 

 

[NewbieJr 540]

This debate is similar to the Durant or Greg Oden debate before the draft that year. Like Oden, Woods hasn't won sh!t in years.

 

Federer in a massive landslide. Not even close.

[drobeski 3,061]

[drobeski 3,061]

 

[edjr 5,563]

[edjr 5,563]

Federer going to ANOTHER Grand Slam semifinal

 

What's Tiger up to?

[kutulu 1,545]

[The Moz 69]

Fed lost yet again

 

Obviously Woods > Fed

[WhiteWonder 2,171]

Federer still relevant at majors... Woods not so much.

 

 

 

 

no but really Woods > Federer

[drobeski 3,061]

So did federer win ? Tough sunday net placement?

[edjr 5,563]

ANOTHER Grand Slam Final.

 

What place did Tiger finish in his last Major?

[drobeski 3,061]

Those sunday net placements are a killer

 

 

 

 

Tennis

[drobeski 3,061]

How'd federer hit his driver? Did he putt well ?

He lost right, we are celebrating a loss?

 

Welcome to soccer raised america

[WhiteWonder 2,171]

How'd federer hit his driver? Did he putt well ?

He lost right, we are celebrating a loss?

 

Welcome to soccer raised america

Federer did about as well as you making timely draft picks.

 

#vagisil

[Sho Nuff 719]

How'd federer hit his driver? Did he putt well ?

He lost right, we are celebrating a loss?

 

Welcome to soccer raised america

 

Arguing Tennis vs. Golf and you want to make a joke about soccer?

 

oof.

[drobeski 3,061]

 

Arguing Tennis vs. Golf and you want to make a joke about soccer?

 

oof.

yes might throw suck ass pussie sport into an already stupid comparison. Why not ?

Doofus

[Googballz 39]

Has there ever been a hook Sho Nuff didn't jump on?

[Sho Nuff 719]

yes might throw suck ass pussie sport into an already stupid comparison. Why not ?

Doofus

 

You just keep proving that the only doofus pussie is you.

[NewbieJr 540]

I think Federer's play in the Wimbledon took a lot of people by surprise. It's amazing the level he can still play at from time to time. I feel like Sunday may have been his last good chance to win a Slam event. I hope I'm wrong, But with Nadal, Djokavic, and Murray all being so good and so much younger, the odds are against him.

[edjr 5,563]

I think Federer's play in the Wimbledon took a lot of people by surprise. It's amazing the level he can still play at from time to time. I feel like Sunday may have been his last good chance to win a Slam event. I hope I'm wrong, But with Nadal, Djokavic, and Murray all being so good and so much younger, the odds are against him.

 

[drobeski 3,061]

 

You just keep proving that the only doofus pussie is you.

daaaaahhhhhh predictable

[Sho Nuff 719]

daaaaahhhhhh predictable

as is your reply (and your boy following you around)

[edjr 5,563]

Way go to Tiger.

 

When it's 1 on 1 you choke again.

 

I still love you and you're my favorite golfer, but it's obvious Federer is better in his sport than you are in yours. Thanks for playing.

 

for KSB

 

This is the OP

[KSB2424 3,083]

There's probably a reason this thread is so long. Golf and Tennis are just two totally different sports to try and compare too. One is a tournament the other you play against the field. On one hand tennis is more physically demanding but on the other it would seem to be much easier to win a tournamnet if you were the dominant player as you are only playing a small portion of the field.

[edjr 5,563]

There's probably a reason this thread is so long. Golf and Tennis are just two totally different sports to try and compare too. One is a tournament the other you play against the field. On one hand tennis is more physically demanding but on the other it would seem to be much easier to win a tournamnet if you were the dominant player as you are only playing a small portion of the field.

 

As of 2007, Roger had done what no one else ever has in his sport, Tiger, was on his way.

 

Look now, today in 2014.

This isn't even a question who dominated their sport more.

[drobeski 3,061]

There's probably a reason this thread is so long. Golf and Tennis are just two totally different sports to try and compare too. One is a tournament the other you play against the field. On one hand tennis is more physically demanding but on the other it would seem to be much easier to win a tournamnet if you were the dominant player as you are only playing a small portion of the field.

I made those points, they're just gonna hate tiger. I blame racism.

[edjr 5,563]

I made those points, they're just gonna hate tiger. I blame racism.

 

yes in 2007. Fine.

 

it's 2014 now and Tiger is a joke and Federer is still winning and making grand slam finals, long after most players play, let alone compete

[KSB2424 3,083]

 

As of 2007, Roger had done what no one else ever has in his sport, Tiger, was on his way.

 

Look now, today in 2014.

This isn't even a question who dominated their sport more.

 

Sort of like the MVP award I think you need to clairfy what you mean by "dominate".

 

Are you saying that Roger Federer is the greatest of all time in his sport because he's won the most tournaments or "majors" or are you saying during his prime years he was the most dominate tennis player the sport has ever seen?

 

As an example lets take Wilt Chamberlin versus Kareem Abdul Jabbar. Kareem holds most all the "career" records for centers, because he was so good for so long. But I'd argue Wilt was more dominate, in that he dominated his sport and postion more when he played.

[drobeski 3,061]

 

Sort of like the MVP award I think you need to clairfy what you mean by "dominate".

 

Are you saying that Roger Federer is the greatest of all time in his sport because he's won the most tournaments or "majors" or are you saying during his prime years he was the most dominate tennis player the sport has ever seen?

 

As an example lets take Wilt Chamberlin versus Kareem Abdul Jabbar. Kareem holds most all the "career" records for centers, because he was so good for so long. But I'd argue Wilt was more dominate, in that he dominated his sport and postion more when he played.

I'll take Bill Russell over both of em.

[edjr 5,563]

 

Sort of like the MVP award I think you need to clairfy what you mean by "dominate".

 

Are you saying that Roger Federer is the greatest of all time in his sport because he's won the most tournaments or "majors" or are you saying during his prime years he was the most dominate tennis player the sport has ever seen?

 

As an example lets take Wilt Chamberlin versus Kareem Abdul Jabbar. Kareem holds most all the "career" records for centers, because he was so good for so long. But I'd argue Wilt was more dominate, in that he dominated his sport and postion more when he played.

 

Roger was more dominant in his sport than Tiger in his.

 

http://www.cbssports.com/golf/eye-on-golf/24610104/forget-tiger-nicklaus-what-about-nicklaus-federer

[edjr 5,563]

Federer still going strong.

 

made the Australian Open quarters and not done.

 

 

What's Tiger been up to?

[Cruzer 1,992]

What's Tiger been up to?

Lining up his next swing coach... Not the next one after Como now, the one after the one he fires after Como.

[edjr 5,563]

Federer is into the Semis at ANOTHER major.