Jump to content



Photo

Anti-Trump FBI Agent at center of Clinton Email & Russian Collusion Scandals


  • Please log in to reply
150 replies to this topic

#1 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 17,638 posts

Posted 05 December 2017 - 09:59 AM

http://www.foxnews.c...s-revealed.html

 

So we finally have a face to match with this partisan hack that got fired from Mueller's Russian probe. Some of his accomplishments in the past couple years:

 

He was involved with letting the DNC NOT produce the server they claim was hacked.

 

He was also found to have changed the wording of the FBI's response to the Clinton Private Email Server scandal.

 

He also was the focal point in dealings with Christopher Steele (Compiler of the Trump Dossier). 

 

The cherry on top is that he was one of two agents that interviewed Michael Flynn. It's being suggested that Flynn's lawyer wasn't present (they arrived short notice).

 

 

And this indicative of the people we're supposed to trust to run an impartial investigation?!


BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#2 drobeski

drobeski

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 56,300 posts

Posted 05 December 2017 - 10:02 AM

The deep state is real folks.

#3 wiffleball

wiffleball

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 57,566 posts

Posted 05 December 2017 - 10:09 AM

Just like the 3rd or 4th thread with this non-news in it? You know, where the FBI that Trump doesn't trust ratted this guy out? Where Mueller who Trump doesn't trust reassign this guy? And you know where the media
that Trump doesn't trust actually reported the hell out of it?


See, that's the difference. The good guys operate with transparency. The bad guys look for 17 different excuses not to tell anybody and then 17 more ways to try an obtuse skate misdirect and flat-out lie about it.

But hey, if you're lucky maybe this guy will come out and say his lawyer dictated all of his behavior. Wait, that didn't work out so well for Trump either.

You guys are so desperate for a win you'll actually take a self-reporting as a victory. I bet if a guy kneel down you take it as a tackle. LOL
Users currently on :ignore: BudBro,Flahawker

#4 lickin_starfish

lickin_starfish

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 2,291 posts

Posted 05 December 2017 - 10:14 AM

He needs to meet a firing squad. His bullsnot is borderline treasonous.


Tool fan

#5 Hardcore troubadour

Hardcore troubadour

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 23,941 posts

Posted 05 December 2017 - 10:22 AM

How did he get on the team in the first place? Meuller needs to go just for that. This whole thing is farce.

#6 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 17,638 posts

Posted 05 December 2017 - 10:34 AM



Just like the 3rd or 4th thread with this non-news in it? You know, where the FBI that Trump doesn't trust ratted this guy out? Where Mueller who Trump doesn't trust reassign this guy? And you know where the media
that Trump doesn't trust actually reported the hell out of it?


See, that's the difference. The good guys operate with transparency. The bad guys look for 17 different excuses not to tell anybody and then 17 more ways to try an obtuse skate misdirect and flat-out lie about it.

But hey, if you're lucky maybe this guy will come out and say his lawyer dictated all of his behavior. Wait, that didn't work out so well for Trump either.

You guys are so desperate for a win you'll actually take a self-reporting as a victory. I bet if a guy kneel down you take it as a tackle. LOL

 
Transparency? It took the FBI 3 months to release why he was released. As a member of the justice dept. and part of an investigation, you're supposed to be impartial and unbiased. It's clear he was biased which was or wasn't known until well after he'd had an effect on those investigation. 
 
Can't unring the bell man.

BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#7 Hardcore troubadour

Hardcore troubadour

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 23,941 posts

Posted 05 December 2017 - 10:36 AM

Two bit hacks like Wiffle and Worms toss around "obstruction of justice" as
If they have the least bit of concern about justice. "And justice for ALL" Rememebe that? Or
did they take a knee for the pledge?

#8 IMMensaMind

IMMensaMind

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 8,591 posts

Posted 05 December 2017 - 10:37 AM

Just like the 3rd or 4th thread with this non-news in it? You know, where the FBI that Trump doesn't trust ratted this guy out? Where Mueller who Trump doesn't trust reassign this guy? And you know where the media
that Trump doesn't trust actually reported the hell out of it?
See, that's the difference. The good guys operate with transparency. The bad guys look for 17 different excuses not to tell anybody and then 17 more ways to try an obtuse skate misdirect and flat-out lie about it.
But hey, if you're lucky maybe this guy will come out and say his lawyer dictated all of his behavior. Wait, that didn't work out so well for Trump either.
You guys are so desperate for a win you'll actually take a self-reporting as a victory. I bet if a guy kneel down you take it as a tackle. LOL


We're doing nothing but winning. You, on the other hand, are a phrenetic mess. You've been whupped so hard for the past year that it's hard to distinguish your rash from the whip marks.

This isn't transparency; it's corruption. For you to think otherwise isn't thinking at all, but more fever swamp TDS.

#9 Mike Honcho

Mike Honcho

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 11,154 posts

Posted 05 December 2017 - 10:49 AM

We're doing nothing but winning. You, on the other hand, are a phrenetic mess. You've been whupped so hard for the past year that it's hard to distinguish your rash from the whip marks.
This isn't transparency; it's corruption. For you to think otherwise isn't thinking at all, but more fever swamp TDS.


Yeah, this adminstration is winning like the Titanic. :lol:

#10 IMMensaMind

IMMensaMind

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 8,591 posts

Posted 05 December 2017 - 11:33 AM

Yeah, this adminstration is winning like the Titanic. :lol:


:dunno:

I see winning. I judge it by:

1. The number of you leftists who are having strokes
2. The volume of totally transparent bullsht progs in government and the media are throwing up to destroy Trump.

I see winning. So sorry for you that your gravy train to other people's pockets is under attack, I guess. :lol:

#11 Baker Boy

Baker Boy

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 3,873 posts

Posted 05 December 2017 - 01:10 PM

Another topic the Left does not feel comfortable talking about.
"I don't want to belong to any club that would have Wiff as one of their members"

#12 drobeski

drobeski

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 56,300 posts

Posted 05 December 2017 - 01:33 PM

Another topic the Left does not feel comfortable talking about.

the know it alls are mysteriously quite in this one.

#13 Hardcore troubadour

Hardcore troubadour

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 23,941 posts

Posted 05 December 2017 - 01:36 PM

Another topic the Left does not feel comfortable talking about.


I know. All there is is some Wiffle babble.

#14 Reality

Reality

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 10,352 posts

Posted 05 December 2017 - 01:36 PM

Just like the 3rd or 4th thread with this non-news in it? You know, where the FBI that Trump doesn't trust ratted this guy out? Where Mueller who Trump doesn't trust reassign this guy? And you know where the media
that Trump doesn't trust actually reported the hell out of it?


See, that's the difference. The good guys operate with transparency. The bad guys look for 17 different excuses not to tell anybody and then 17 more ways to try an obtuse skate misdirect and flat-out lie about it.

But hey, if you're lucky maybe this guy will come out and say his lawyer dictated all of his behavior. Wait, that didn't work out so well for Trump either.

You guys are so desperate for a win you'll actually take a self-reporting as a victory. I bet if a guy kneel down you take it as a tackle. LOL

 

This guy..

 

:lol:  :lol:



#15 drobeski

drobeski

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 56,300 posts

Posted 05 December 2017 - 01:40 PM

 
This guy..
 
:lol:  :lol:

no schit, transparency :lol: they destroyed most evidence and withheld the rest.
What a hack clown.

#16 NorthernVike

NorthernVike

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 31,218 posts

Posted 05 December 2017 - 02:07 PM

Just like the 3rd or 4th thread with this non-news in it?

 

 

Pot meet kettle.  :doh:


Being an ass hole is all part of my manly essence

 

 



You guys have no focking clue what happened so you really should just shut it..

 


#17 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 17,638 posts

Posted 05 December 2017 - 03:28 PM

http://www.foxnews.c...m-so-proud.html

Another member of Mueller's team showing blatant anti trump bias

BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#18 Hardcore troubadour

Hardcore troubadour

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 23,941 posts

Posted 05 December 2017 - 03:31 PM

http://www.foxnews.c...m-so-proud.html

Another member of Mueller's team showing blatant anti trump bias


Wrap it up now. If these obviously biased empty suits couldn't come up with something by now then there isn't anything having to do with Russia. Enough

#19 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 17,638 posts

Posted 05 December 2017 - 04:09 PM

If I were Flynn, I'd take my chances on getting the whole mess tossed. No attorney present?!!!

BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#20 SenatorRock

SenatorRock

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 216 posts

Posted 05 December 2017 - 06:22 PM

Didn't several police officers get fired from Ferguson PD because they were caught emailing and texting racist material?

Not sure why this should be any different. If you have an inherent bias against the person you are investigating then you should be recused.

#21 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 17,638 posts

Posted 06 December 2017 - 08:04 AM

https://nypost.com/2...a-partisan-hit/   Good article by the NYPost:    

 

So Peter Strzok wasn’t just a top investigator for Special Counsel Robert Mueller until he was axed for anti-Trump and pro-Clinton bias: He was also a major player in the Hillary e-mail probe and the FBI work that led to the “collusion” investigation.  

 

And Mueller and the FBI both dragged their feet on sharing key info about all this with Congress. Including the news that Strzok was the one who changed then-FBI chief Jim Comey’s draft language on Clinton’s use of that private server from “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless” in the final version.  

 

That’s huge, because the statute specifies that gross negligence in the handling of classified info is itself a crime, whatever the intent — though Comey declared that Clinton shouldn’t face prosecution precisely because she had no “intent” to break the law.  

 

Strzok also conducted the FBI interviews of Clinton and her top aides, Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin, in the e-mail probe.  

 

More, he was reportedly one of the major FBI figures urging investigations on the basis of the “Steele dossier” of Russian-sourced scurrilous anti-Trump allegations, which we now know was commissioned by the Clinton campaign.  

 

More, he signed the documents that opened the ensuing “collusion” probe. And he led the FBI interview of Gen. Mike Flynn, in which Flynn told the lies that eventually forced him out as Trump’s national security adviser, and for which he’s now pleaded guilty in a deal with Mueller.  

 

Meanwhile, Mills and Abedin’s testimony in their interviews has been shown false in one major regard: Contrary to their denials, each had been well aware of Clinton’s private server — they had to deal with the office fallout whenever it went down. Unlike Flynn, though, they never faced charges for lying to federal investigators.  

 

Which makes President Trump’s request to Comey to go easy on Flynn look reasonable enough.

 

 The public doesn’t know just how egregious Strzok’s bias was, and won’t until the release of his texts with his mistress, an FBI lawyer who (sigh) was also on Mueller’s team.  

 

But as things stand, it now looks like the fix was well and truly in on the Hillary probe. Far worse, it also looks like the “collusion” probe was a partisan hit from the start — which undermines the basis for Mueller’s own investigation.  

 

What a mess.

   

BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#22 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 17,638 posts

Posted 07 December 2017 - 09:27 AM

So DOJ is reviewing 10,000 texts between this Agent and Lisa Page (girlfriend). Will they contain any information about the investigation and if so, will he be charged with leaking info about active investigation?

BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#23 drobeski

drobeski

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 56,300 posts

Posted 07 December 2017 - 09:41 AM

So DOJ is reviewing 10,000 texts between this Agent and Lisa Page (girlfriend). Will they contain any information about the investigation and if so, will he be charged with leaking info about active investigation?

its about to get ugly for the whole Russian collusion conspiracy theorists.

#24 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 17,638 posts

Posted 07 December 2017 - 11:54 AM

A top DOJ official got demoted for his contacts with Christopher Steele during 2016. Some guy named Ohr.

http://www.foxnews.c...ssier-firm.html

BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#25 Hardcore troubadour

Hardcore troubadour

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 23,941 posts

Posted 07 December 2017 - 11:55 AM

And the hits, just keep on coming.

#26 avoiding injuries

avoiding injuries

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 3,416 posts

Posted 07 December 2017 - 12:22 PM

Regardless of the final outcome, nothing about anything the FBI is going to be credible to half the population. Is there anything the FBI could/should do? Otherwise, it's all a waste of time and tax money.

#27 wiffleball

wiffleball

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 57,566 posts

Posted 07 December 2017 - 12:44 PM

Man talk about snowflakes. The good news is, one of the Republican Senators actually grilled Rae the FBI had on this today. Basically said is it okay for your agents to have personal opinions? And he said well of course it is. That's why we have reviews and controls in place to make sure that regardless of personal feelings, logical actions and conclusions are met. That's the whole point of having an independent counsel. But we can't very well ask every agent to not have an opinion on anything when they come in the door. The Republican was Darrell Izza by the way. And actually sounded like he wasn't one of these hand-wringing snowflakes looking for any excuse as to why Muller's investigation couldn't be believed. Shows you how much s*** trouble the trump crew knows they're in when they're already trying to look for excuses as to why they're going to be called criminals.
Users currently on :ignore: BudBro,Flahawker

#28 Hardcore troubadour

Hardcore troubadour

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 23,941 posts

Posted 07 December 2017 - 12:58 PM

Attorney General gets held in contempt- Meh
Fredo lawyers up- OMG!

#29 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 17,638 posts

Posted 07 December 2017 - 01:11 PM

http://www.foxnews.c...-questions.html

 

FBI Agent Jeannie Rhee is another one of Mueller's team whose left leaning tendencies threaten to make the whole investigation get tossed.

 

JFC..............you can't make this sh!t up. Did they organize this team at the Hillary Book 'What Happened?' opening?


BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#30 wiffleball

wiffleball

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 57,566 posts

Posted 07 December 2017 - 01:12 PM

Honest question, did these apparently pro-hillary people force all of the Trump staffers to live repeatedly on their disclosure forms? How does that work?
Users currently on :ignore: BudBro,Flahawker

#31 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 17,638 posts

Posted 07 December 2017 - 01:16 PM

Honest question, did these apparently pro-hillary people force all of the Trump staffers to live repeatedly on their disclosure forms? How does that work?

 

I guess when people accept jobs in Dept of Justice, it's supposed to come with no party affiliation. Scales of Justice being blind and whatnot.

 

Apparently these left leaners were so sure of a Hillary victory they acted with impunity. It would explain why they're rigging the deck of this investigation to try and control how much of their actions in 2016 get revealed.


BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#32 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 17,638 posts

Posted 07 December 2017 - 01:39 PM

A top DOJ official got demoted for his contacts with Christopher Steele during 2016. Some guy named Ohr.

http://www.foxnews.c...ssier-firm.html

 

So this Ohr guy ALSO met with Fusion GPS Co-Founder Simpson right after the election.

 

This onion of corruption has more layers than seem possible. No wonder the FBI is stonewalling the HIC. 


BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#33 SaintsInDome2006

SaintsInDome2006

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 3,455 posts

Posted 07 December 2017 - 06:17 PM

I trust the Inspector General.

 

Will Trump followers respect and accept his conclusions?



#34 Hardcore troubadour

Hardcore troubadour

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 23,941 posts

Posted 07 December 2017 - 06:18 PM

Jim Jordan did a number on the FBI Director today. That guy Wray is a total lightweight.

#35 SaintsInDome2006

SaintsInDome2006

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 3,455 posts

Posted 07 December 2017 - 06:27 PM

Jim Jordan did a number on the FBI Director today. That guy Wray is a total lightweight.


Who picked him to be FBI Director?

#36 Hardcore troubadour

Hardcore troubadour

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 23,941 posts

Posted 07 December 2017 - 06:30 PM

Who picked him to be FBI Director?


Trump doesn't know what he's doing. Duh.

#37 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 17,638 posts

Posted 07 December 2017 - 06:33 PM



I trust the Inspector General.
 
Will Trump followers respect and accept his conclusions?

 
How can we trust the Government to police itself after all the revelations that have been made over the past year? FFS the FBI colluded with the people (met with Steele/Fusion GPS) to spy on a Presidential Campaign candidate for the other candidate. That cannot be refuted at this point.

BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#38 SenatorRock

SenatorRock

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 216 posts

Posted 07 December 2017 - 06:41 PM

I trust the Inspector General.
 
Will Trump followers respect and accept his conclusions?


You won't.

I admired your thoroughness and rational thinking in the Hillary thread but at some point in 2016 you went full retard with respect to Trump.

When the OIG comes out in a few weeks exposing the corruption in Obama's DOJ/FBI and Mueller's investigation falls apart and Trump is vindicated there isn't a single anti-trumper that will accept it.

It has been over a year and they still haven't accepted the fact he won the election.

I hope I'm wrong. I liked it better when Saints was on the winning team.

Props to you for having the balls and intellectual curiosity to step over here to the dark side to see what the other side thinks.

#39 Cdub100

Cdub100

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 20,976 posts

Posted 07 December 2017 - 06:44 PM

How many people work at the FBI? 2?


“for family, for freedom, for country, and for God” - President Donald J. Trump

 


#40 SenatorRock

SenatorRock

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 216 posts

Posted 07 December 2017 - 06:45 PM

Wray got a telephone pole up his ass today in the hearing.

Basically admitted there were fisa warrants on Trump's campaign and transition team.

The guy grilling him obviously knows something to go down that line of questioning.

In the coming weeks we will learn:

Strzok handled the dossier and submitted it for fisa warrants, despite knowing that it was full of Russian propaganda.

Strzok was removed from Mueller's Investigation not because of anti-trump texts, something much bigger.

Honestly, it wouldn't surprise me if Strzok has flipped and is cooperating with the OIG.