NewbieJr 540 Posted April 13, 2017 Could you imagine morons like Filthy or Hardcore sitting down for two hours one day and actually watching a news channel other than Fox? I bet they would be crying after about 30 minutes. When they realize how much they've been lied to and brainwashed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
12th Man 884 Posted April 13, 2017 Could you imagine morons like Filthy or Hardcore sitting down for two hours one day and actually watching a news channel other than Fox? I bet they would be crying after about 30 minutes. When they realize how much they've been lied to and brainwashed.That's Gold Jerry! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,636 Posted April 13, 2017 So we have folks looking into Trump and companies Russian ties and constantly finding things. Remember this whole thread was started when it was determined Carter page was indeed an actual Russian agent. He wasn't just swept up in sort of ancillary surveillance. He was an actual Russian agent who was caught under legal FISA surveillance repeatedly. And this is the number2 guy that Trump listed as his National Security team. That is all on video and audio tape. Now the Trump company is saying they've never heard of the guy. That is a flat out lie no matter how much you are in denial. So on the one hand, you have nembers of both sides of the aisle saying there is nothing to the rice investigation. But on the other hand, every time they pick up a rock, they find another Russian contact in the Trump cabal. I know various people are dug in deeper than a tick on a coonhound, but just objectively, given that alone, which would you tend to believe more? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,636 Posted April 13, 2017 And secondly, let's play Fantasy Land and assume that both sides are dirty. Which is worse? Trump's team colluded with a hostile foreign superpower to influence American elections. Or Susan Rice outted the guys who are colluding with a hostile foreign super power. Because in the end, that's what it boils down to. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted April 13, 2017 And secondly, let's play Fantasy Land and assume that both sides are dirty. Which is worse? Trump's team colluded with a hostile foreign superpower to influence American elections. Or Susan Rice outted the guys who are colluding with a hostile foreign super power. Because in the end, that's what it boils down to. did it effect the election ? If so we'll need some proof of that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted April 13, 2017 Whatever Nunes has is merely the tip of the iceberg. You of course don't want them digging further for it might look bad for your boy Obama and quite possibly Hillary. Nunes had nothing. He had a bunch of crap the WH spoon fed him. You infer thendoggong is indicative of something as about Obama...but apparently not when the dogging is about Trump. So inconsistent. Holding out hope that Obama...for some reason...was running surveillance on Trump for no good reason. Oof. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted April 13, 2017 So we have folks looking into Trump and companies Russian ties and constantly finding things. Remember this whole thread was started when it was determined Carter page was indeed an actual Russian agent. He wasn't just swept up in sort of ancillary surveillance. He was an actual Russian agent who was caught under legal FISA surveillance repeatedly. And this is the number2 guy that Trump listed as his National Security team. That is all on video and audio tape. Now the Trump company is saying they've never heard of the guy. That is a flat out lie no matter how much you are in denial. So on the one hand, you have nembers of both sides of the aisle saying there is nothing to the rice investigation. But on the other hand, every time they pick up a rock, they find another Russian contact in the Trump cabal. I know various people are dug in deeper than a tick on a coonhound, but just objectively, given that alone, which would you tend to believe more? There are those that believe Trump and party over everything. Then again...they are the people dumb enough to vote Trump and still defend him thru everything. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted April 13, 2017 did it effect the election ? If so we'll need some proof of that. It's irrelevant. If one sided collided with a hostile foreign nation in an attempt to do so...the effect is meaningless. What you are proving (and what everyone not up Trumps ass already know...)is many of you are definitely Party over Country. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 824 Posted April 13, 2017 And secondly, let's play Fantasy Land and assume that both sides are dirty. Which is worse? Trump's team colluded with a hostile foreign superpower to influence American elections. Or Susan Rice outted the guys who are colluding with a hostile foreign super power. Because in the end, that's what it boils down to. So we know Denzil plays Obama in the film....I'm thinking Kerry Washington for the heroic Susan Rice role. By the time it gets made, she will be in her mid 40s. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,619 Posted April 13, 2017 There are those that believe Trump and party over everything. Then again...they are the people dumb enough to vote Trump and still defend him thru everything. Says the guy who voted for Gary Johnson 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted April 13, 2017 Bothered by facts...Im sure its all just nothing right? https://twitter.com/GStephanopoulos/status/852489098459832321 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted April 13, 2017 Didn't Carter Page get axed prior to the nomination? It was certainly well before the election. So back to Sho, Queef and Meathead......was do you defend Obama and Hillary so hard given you all claim you didn't vote for them? Do you think if they're found to be guilty of spying that it'll reduce their already pathetic legacy? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted April 13, 2017 Didn't Carter Page get axed prior to the nomination? It was certainly well before the election. So back to Sho, Queef and Meathead......was do you defend Obama and Hillary so hard given you all claim you didn't vote for them? Do you think if they're found to be guilty of spying that it'll reduce their already pathetic legacy? Nobody defends Hillary and Obama as hard as you all have wth Trump. You still think both were illegally spying. And you think that's worse than the crap Trump people are being caught doing. Seriously delusional man...seek help. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted April 13, 2017 Nobody defends Hillary and Obama as hard as you all have wth Trump. You still think both were illegally spying. And you think that's worse than the crap Trump people are being caught doing. Seriously delusional man...seek help. I've said investigate Trump and company fully BUT investigate everyone fully. You've already got Hillary guilty of destroying evidence in the private server scandal so prosecute. Lois Lerner.....guilty....prosecute. Investigate from top to bottom and prosecute. If Trump is dirty oh well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,619 Posted April 13, 2017 If they had Page under surveillance over a year ago, how come we don't know what they found out? Flynn was under for about a month and that info got out right away. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted April 13, 2017 I've said investigate Trump and company fully BUT investigate everyone fully. You've already got Hillary guilty of destroying evidence in the private server scandal so prosecute. Lois Lerner.....guilty....prosecute. Investigate from top to bottom and prosecute. If Trump is dirty oh well. Hillary was investigated. Lerner and the IRS were investigated. Yiu seem to also want full investigations every time trump tweets something he saw on fox or Breitbart. It's ridiculous Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted April 13, 2017 Hillary was investigated. Lerner and the IRS were investigated. Yiu seem to also want full investigations every time trump tweets something he saw on fox or Breitbart. It's ridiculous Reexamine those cases with some fresh eyes and keep Comey's partisan's a $$ on sidelines. Need I pull the Gowdy/Comey exchange? Comey provided a sh!t ton of cover for Hillary. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted April 13, 2017 Reexamine those cases with some fresh eyes and keep Comey's partisan's a $$ on sidelines. Need I pull the Gowdy/Comey exchange? Comey provided a sh!t ton of cover for Hillary. You whine that Comey is partisan...yet you want to cite Gowdy. They have been investigated...thus keep looking til you find what the GOP wants is stupid. It's why we have had multiple investigations turn up nothing about Hillary and Benghazi. You're reaching with nothing because your guyvTrump and his people have a cloud of crap over them Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,619 Posted April 13, 2017 Hillary was investigated. Lerner and the IRS were investigated. Yiu seem to also want full investigations every time trump tweets something he saw on fox or Breitbart. It's ridiculous Clapper said there was no evidence of Trump colluding with the Russians. How come that's not good enough, but Comey clearing HRC is? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted April 13, 2017 https://mobile.twitter.com/CBSNews/status/852606709117988874 Pompeo...the Trump appointed CIA director saying wiki is basically an arm of Russian Intelligence now. But it's all just the democrats saying...right? Lots of chatter that Giuliani is in some too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745 Posted April 14, 2017 did it effect the election ? If so we'll need some proof of that. Not necessary. An attempt is treasonous enough. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted April 14, 2017 https://mobile.twitter.com/CBSNews/status/852606709117988874 Pompeo...the Trump appointed CIA director saying wiki is basically an arm of Russian Intelligence now. But it's all just the democrats saying...right? Lots of chatter that Giuliani is in some ###### too. Wonder what an investigation into the Clinton Foundation would reveal about Russia. Bill's speaking fees doubled, millions of $$ in donations.....nothing to see there folks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted April 14, 2017 Wonder what an investigation into the Clinton Foundation would reveal about Russia. Bill's speaking fees doubled, millions of $$ in donations.....nothing to see there folks. That's your take? Whining about Clinton again. Trumps own CIA guy just told you your defemse of all this wiki stuff is idiotic and you whine about the Clintons again. Holy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted April 14, 2017 That's your take? Whining about Clinton again. Trumps own CIA guy just told you your defemse of all this wiki stuff is idiotic and you whine about the Clintons again. Holy ###### Wkikleaks released what that wasn't true? **crickets** Of course the CIA is p!ssed numbnuts. Wiki showed the crowd how the magician does his tricks. FFS.....If you would put half the time into thinking rationally as you do raging like a b!tch over Trump you wouldn't come across as such a hack. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted April 14, 2017 Wkikleaks released what that wasn't true? **crickets** Of course the CIA is p!ssed numbnuts. Wiki showed the crowd how the magician does his tricks. FFS.....If you would put half the time into thinking rationally as you do raging like a b!tch over Trump you wouldn't come across as such a hack. He states that they are basically an arm of Russian Intel. He is substantiating tue hacking claims. He is a Trump guy...and he is backing those before him who you claim shouldn't be trusted in their report. Thinking rationally? Have you read your idiotic posts here? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745 Posted April 14, 2017 Wonder what an investigation into the Clinton Foundation would reveal about Russia. Bill's speaking fees doubled, millions of $$ in donations.....nothing to see there folks. Maybe, but see, neither of them are the focking president. One is the president and everyone he knows apparently talks with the Russians who may have had a hand in influencing our election. The other is a shady foundation run by two private citizens. Gee, wonder why sane people care about the former more than the latter. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted April 14, 2017 Russians who may have had a hand in influencing our election. How did that happen? Wikileaks exposing the truth about the Democrats rigging the election among other true things? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 540 Posted April 14, 2017 Funny how Trump is no longer a fan of WikiLeaks. Leaks are awesome when you are railing against the establishment. Not so fun when you are the establishment. LOL Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted April 15, 2017 You whine that Comey is partisan...yet you want to cite Gowdy. They have been investigated...thus keep looking til you find what the GOP wants is stupid. It's why we have had multiple investigations turn up nothing about Hillary and Benghazi. Seems pretty clear she lied to the FBI and Comey lied about her lying. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted April 15, 2017 Seems pretty clear she lied to the FBI and Comey lied about her lying. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted April 16, 2017 Clearly Hillary is more qualified to leave us since she is above the law. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted April 20, 2017 Louise Mensch has some out there stuff. But lately she has been hitting damn close to stuff. She talked about Page long ago...and here we have it. Now a little while ago she starts mentioning Chaffetz...and now he won't seek reelection. He is even talking that he may not finish his term. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted April 21, 2017 https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/federal_government/house-intel-panel-to-hear-from-top-officials-on-russia-probe/2017/04/21/126892b4-26b1-11e7-928e-3624539060e8_story.html?utm_term=.776d26daafd6 May finally get some hearings out of this committee. Looks like they are bringing Yates in too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,484 Posted April 24, 2017 More fake news from the Left! Tilt! Foam at the Mouth! I will believe anything antiTrump! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted April 24, 2017 Update?Another R in charge of a congressional committee is stonewalling things. This time in the senate. No worries...they can't hide everything. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted April 24, 2017 Another R in charge of a congressional committee is stonewalling things. This time in the senate. No worries...they can't hide everything. stonewalling? Let me know when they all plead the 5th Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted April 24, 2017 stonewalling? Let me know when they all plead the 5th Refusing to request testimony or documents related to the investigation despite requests from members of his committee. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted April 24, 2017 Refusing to request testimony or documents related to the investigation despite requests from members of his committee.sounds familiar, maybe they can bang their heads or have a convenient trash bin fire ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
