nobody

They had Ladd playing the X a lot because almost their entire receiving core are smurfs, so he was a fish out of water. They had him as an outside when he's really a slot receiver that can play outside sometimes.

I remember arguing with people that the jab wasn't stopping the spread well before the whole, "we never said getting the jab would stop you from getting it" absolute BS even came out. I knew because towns with 90% vax rates were still getting infections. In fact the same gaslighters that we're trying to tell me "no one ever said you wouldn't get it if you got vaxed" were the same people telling me that I'm killing grannies because only unvaxxed are spreading it.

Dumb. As soon as the infection rate R0 drops below 1, the infection will die off. You don't need anywhere close to mass vaccination for that to happen. That's how all of us with common sense knew all you jab pushers were full of shìt. You can't have 35% of your population vaccinated, another 35% having recent previous infection and still see the infection numbers we were seeing. That was obvious to people with common sense all the while you covidians tried to tell us it was a "pandemic of the unvaccinated."

You are the one saying that 95% effective doesn't mean 95% of people won't get it. I'm just saying that doesn't equate to everyone gets it. And the classic gaslighter defense. Tell the person you're gaslighting that they're gaslighting you. You're a terrible person. We all know what we were told. You're the one saying we were told something different.

So now you're just making up things I didn't say. What a surprise.

Your making the distinction between 95% of people vs 95% effective by acting like 95% effective should actually mean what? Everyone still gets it? Keep that gaslighting going like people weren't told what they were told.

I get the difference, but in the end, the numbers shouldn't diverge that much.

I'm not reading all that from a known gaslighter, but let me guess. It's a bunch of words explaining how I didn't see what I saw.

I'm sure whatever test they ran spit out a result saying it was 95% effective. And I have a clear memory of officials claiming that people that get the jab won't get covid. There were no caveats on variants. There was no talk of reducing severity. You won't get it (or at least 95% of people wouldn't get it)... Full stop. That's not what happened. Therefore, those claims were false. No amount of spin or gaslighting us will change that. You're a shill for the jab, and you're not trustworthy.

They love to gaslight. You're absolutely right that this was the narrative. Now he's splitting hairs about variants, but those were never part of the story originally because of they said, "it's 95% effective today, and it'll be waaaaay less than that in two months," they wouldn't have coerced as many people into getting jabs. He also loves the well it was only 95% thing as an out which is another gaslight. If only 5% of the jabbed could still have gotten it, it would've petered out very quickly. The jab never prevented shìt. By the time it got widespread, the variants it may have been effective against were already gone.

His measurables are outstanding, but I saw no evidence that he can turn. Seems like a Michael Gallup type. Just line up and run go routes all game.

By the way, the Bitcoin supply is decreasing in the long run. People will lose their keys or people will die, and those Bitcoin will be lost forever.

So we didn't know the supply was capped before the halving?

Preach. More evidence that the BLM riots were blessed by them. You can't look at them sideways, but rioters are allowed to burn down people's businesses. This shìt is sick.

I guess if the perspective is miners introduce new Bitcoin and then immediately sell it on the market, the supply/demand thinking works, but I'd off that's not how markets work. The moment information is known it gets priced in. It's called the efficient market hypothesis.