listen2me 23

Idiot

Quote from my post. There have been talks. 

They just traded for him. His rehab went great. Im not saying he will be amazing now. But Jets made the move. You cant just back out now. Its like buying a stock and then selling at first signs of any losses. Itd be a waste ot time and money and really amateruish. Its not about how good Rodgers will be this year. Its about thr Jets have already made their bed. To now go pick a QB at 10 would be spastic and like I said amateur hour.

This. And what I have said all along. There have been talks. But peace talks shoukd have went hard right away with thr United States directly in them. In the end we could have tried to avoid this many casualties. And the longer this goes the less country Ukraine will have. Crappy chess players.

If theyve loved one of those guys through the process then yeah. Everything changes with who you love. If GB didnt absolutely love Jordan Love then they wouldnt have picked a QB early that year. Im expecting thrm to be there. When I originally responded I thought you meant grab a Bo or Penix at 10. Again it all depends if they believe a certain QB is it and a future great player. They could also trade out of there if one is there and get a good haul. If they draft one at 10 they are basically letting the next couple years just go to waste. They dont pick again until 72. They would be almost giving up on thr big move they just made. If Rodgers plays decent and it upright and wants to play again, he will be the starting NYJs QB next year as well.

Just because the Packers have done it doesn't mean its easy to just do that and teams should just be picking QBs 2 years early just because. GB didnt trade picks for Rodgers a year prior to drafting Love. He had been on the team for a long time and basically wanted to leave. That situation isnt the same. If 1 of those guys were to be there....they probably will not be. But if they were, it doesnt mean the Jets thrmseleves have to like the QB that were to fall. They dont pick again until 72. So take a QB and half azz it with Rodgers? Thatd be a colossal waste of time and resources.

Its funny. These "kids" are so up in arms and mad about "funding genocide" that they go set up tents like a homeless encampment and risk being suspended. Yet they voted for the guy and will again. These are the "highly educated" people.

You act like you have never seen a bridge QB or a rebuild year.

A strongly disagree with all of it. We will see.

I got back on the practice field late in the season and couldn't get to a top speed sprinting, but really been in a good place rehab-wise, from the start, and feeling really good," Rodgers told Bravo. "I'm hopeful I can play two or three or four more years, but you need to have some good fortune in there to."

Why do they need a QB right this second? Rodgers is old. But you dont just go forcing QBs to sit on the bench. If they are in love with one then maybe. But they are trying to win. They just traded for Rodgers. And had a lost season. They arent going to half ass it. Why go trade for Rodgers if you are quickly going to draft a QB and look to the future? Makes little sense to me.

I think thats doubtful. Doubtful on a QB early either way. They dont have a ton of fire power this year. Theyd be trading picks to go up for a Nix basically. Of course if they love a guy then they just may. They hitched their wagon to Rodgers. They are trying to win something this year or next.

Never said any of this. I made a statement. Pick it apart if you want. Dont need to go down the tube or arguing things I didnt say. If you need to deflect then go for it. Never said you cant have both. Feel free to fact check what I actually said.

You dont like my post? You can just say that.

A fraction of the Ukraine aid could build a few shelters. But who am I to say. Hold that line! Or slowly relinquish. Whatever.