weepaws 2,459 Posted April 30, 2015 No way would the Browns spend both 1st rd picks on wr. After all they are the Browns ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike FF Today 607 Posted April 30, 2015 No way would the Browns spend both 1st rd picks on wr. True. Totally forgot we gave the Browns a receiver at No.12. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Showboat 144 Posted May 1, 2015 I don't think that they let Gurley fall (or they trade back with a team that covets him). 1.16 - Todd Gurley I seriously doubt they pick a guy who would probably sit a minimum two years. Agholor. I wasn't too far off - at least the Chargers were apparently a little concerned that Houston would have selected a RB..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vikings4ever 496 Posted May 1, 2015 I wasn't too far off - at least the Chargers were apparently a little concerned that Houston would have selected Gurley..... I'd say more likely they were worried about the Browns trading up. The Texans' scheme made Ben Tate look good, and Ron Dayne look serviceable. No need to spend a first rounder on RB. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
