IGotWorms 3,313 Posted September 5, 2017 of course you don't, it exposes your idiotic blatant hypocrisy. No it doesn't. Stop with this stupid whataboutism crap. You're literally destroying this country. Obama was wrong on the red line in Syria. I said it at the time and I'll say it again now. Now what in the fock does that have to do with the US response to North Korea today, under a different administration? I mean is it really your belief that no administration can ever be questioned about how it handles any kind of international crisis because once Barack obama focked up??! Do you realize how stupid this is? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted September 5, 2017 No it doesn't. Stop with this stupid whataboutism crap. You're literally destroying this country. Obama was wrong on the red line in Syria. I said it at the time and I'll say it again now. Now what in the fock does that have to do with the US response to North Korea today, under a different administration? I mean is it really your belief that no administration can ever be questioned about how it handles any kind of international crisis because once Barack obama focked up??! Do you realize how stupid this is? so what's your suggestion, another world cack sucking tour ? How'd that work out ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,640 Posted September 5, 2017 We should employ strategic patience. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 824 Posted September 5, 2017 One good idea is to stop all trade with any country that does business with North Korea. Yeah, that means China. Yeah, we traded $682B worth of goods and services last year, yes that would cost us 1M jobs. But we have to get tough. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,640 Posted September 5, 2017 Glad I got my new 65 inch samsung before S Korea gets blown up and TV prices skyrocket. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 3,313 Posted September 5, 2017 so what's your suggestion I don't know, it's a perilous situation. My fear is the people in charge right now are in no way up to the task. Honestly I wish I could trust them nonpartisan stuff like dealing with international crises, but I absolutely can't. And here's where that ties in. I'd probably do what the administration is doing right now, which is pursuing this thing through the UN to try to deal with the situation diplomatically. What I would NOT do is tell all our allies to go fock themselves as that doesn't seem conducive to diplomacy in these kinds of very high stakes situations. I also wouldn't scare the sh1t out of longtime allies like South Korea and Japan where they are now justifiably wondering if we will be there to defend them if the crap hits the fan. Which is has justifiably led our other allies around the world to wonder if they can rely on us. I also wouldn't go around saying "North Korea's just itching for war!" and "we're completely prepared to reign fire and brimstone down upon them!" To me that's just escalating a very dangerous conflict. Now is there some end game I don't know about? That's where my belief that these people have no focking clue what they're doing comes in. With a different, capable administration (of any party), I would have a little more confidence in that. As things stand right now I'm worried an unhinged maniac is leading us to the brink. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,640 Posted September 5, 2017 I don't know, it's a perilous situation. My fear is the people in charge right now are in no way up to the task. Honestly I wish I could trust them nonpartisan stuff like dealing with international crises, but I absolutely can't. And here's where that ties in. I'd probably do what the administration is doing right now, which is pursuing this thing through the UN to try to deal with the situation diplomatically. What I would NOT do is tell all our allies to go fock themselves as that doesn't seem conducive to diplomacy in these kinds of very high stakes situations. I also wouldn't scare the sh1t out of longtime allies like South Korea and Japan where they are now justifiably wondering if we will be there to defend them if the crap hits the fan. Which is has justifiably led our other allies around the world to wonder if they can rely on us. I also wouldn't go around saying "North Korea's just itching for war!" and "we're completely prepared to reign fire and brimstone down upon them!" To me that's just escalating a very dangerous conflict. Now is there some end game I don't know about? That's where my belief that these people have no focking clue what they're doing comes in. With a different, capable administration (of any party), I would have a little more confidence in that. As things stand right now I'm worried an unhinged maniac is leading us to the brink. This. Pretty bad when Trump's own staff is publicly disagreeing with him. Gee, THAT sends a clear tone to an already unstable fockstick. And, to all the 'but but butters': WHOLE new Ballgame as far as I'm concerned with missiles flying over Japan. Best possible solution given the variables is massive missile D such that No Ko can't so much as throw a baseball without SoKo and Japan (and others) knocking the shiit out of it. - Or at least making NoKo wonder if such a launch - with a high degree of failure - is worth the resultant shiit-storm. Also, because they've shown absolute disregard for selling anything and being agents of proliferation, you impose a full-scale Int'l inspection regime of every GD ship headed in or out of NoKo. THAT is something that we can get China and Russia on board with. We get the int'l community - especially ASEA to commit ships and resources, we allow food and other humanitarian stuff - so nobody can biitch about that. - And, most importantly, we send a message that says "Okay, can't go back in time, cant undo what's been done - BUT that shiit ain't leaving NK either. - It's the only grown - up response to what IS. They end up with some very expensive paperweights. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted September 5, 2017 Yeah, that means China. Yeah, we traded $682B worth of goods and services last year, yes that would cost us 1M jobs. But we have to get tough. Link to this BS? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted September 5, 2017 has he drawn any lines in the sand ? Yes...he did. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fandandy 3,311 Posted September 5, 2017 Putin today at the BRICS summit: “We all remember what happened with Iraq and Saddam Hussein. His children were killed, I think his grandson was shot, the whole country was destroyed and Saddam Hussein was hanged ... We all know how this happened and people in North Korea remember well what happened in Iraq. “They will eat grass but will not stop their [nuclear] programme as long as they do not feel safe.” Russia and China both have veto powers at UN so the chances of further sanctions, especially those banning trade with NK are non existent. Previous administrations screwed the pooch here. North Korea is now a nuclear power, as is India and Pakistan. What needs to happen is the US pulls out of the DMZ in time and allows/assists SK and Japan to pursue their own nuclear programs. See if China acts then or maybe they wouldn't mind their neighborhood to be armed to the teeth even more so than now. We waited too long to act. This is pretty much check mate and we lose. Stop poking the North in the eye and let those in that neighborhood deal with this. Maybe they can give Un the security he desires without our meddling which has obviously, per usual, only made matters worse. The US sucks at being the global cop. We are an incompetent nation and need for once to mind our own focking business. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,583 Posted September 5, 2017 Well...... Google "List of countries Trump has alienated" and you'll find sections on Australia, Germany, the UK, and more. In short, Trump's entire foreign policy is America first, last, and in between. EVERY decision on trade, on taxes, on immigration, on foreign affairs will be made to benefit American workers and American families. EVERY decision. And he hasn't been polite or respectful about it really. I'm not energized enough to argue for against said foreign policy this morning, but we have to at least recognize that going that route does have potential trade offs like this. please, they are all a bunch of pussies, not one of them has stood up for anything in years, and if we say jump they say how high even today Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 824 Posted September 6, 2017 please, they are all a bunch of pussies, not one of them has stood up for anything in years, and if we say jump they say how high even today Then I hope Trump gives Merkel, May, and Turnballs their orders soon. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,583 Posted September 6, 2017 Then I hope Trump gives Merkel, May, and Turnballs their orders soon. we honestly don't need them for , if they say they agree thats all we need France gonna send us them mighty 2 jet fighters again? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 824 Posted September 6, 2017 we honestly don't need them for ######, if they say they agree thats all we need France gonna send us them mighty 2 jet fighters again? So we need them to say they agree? Or we don't need them for #####? Or it doesn't matter because we just tell them to jump and they'll ask how high? I am with you in spirit, but having some trouble with the X's and O's I guess. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,640 Posted September 6, 2017 we honestly don't need them for ######, if they say they agree thats all we need France gonna send us them mighty 2 jet fighters again? Loathe as I am to praise the Frogs right now, that's a pretty ignorant thought. Even though our idiot Politicians and Press didn't talk about it, The French basically have been kicking ass on the African Continent for a decade+ now. Thank God for that - there's a couple of ISIS/AQ spin-off groups that most experts say make the Tallyban look like Girl Scouts. - And Amurica sat on our hands and (apparently) had Black Hawk Down flashbacks. Even here is a great microcosm: We've got our usual ChickenHawks who freak the F out if someone runs into an idiot in France/Sweden - wherever. Meanwhile, Google: 1) Westgate Mall attack - Nairobi and/or 2) Chibok school girls. It's typically Amurican: Don't talk about anything we're not involved in. Then biitch that nobody else is involved in anything. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,583 Posted September 6, 2017 So we need them to say they agree? Or we don't need them for #####? Or it doesn't matter because we just tell them to jump and they'll ask how high? I am with you in spirit, but having some trouble with the X's and O's I guess. I am saying all we need is the UN to sign off on us handling NK, we don't actually need their forces. But I guarantee Trump even hated can pressure them to sign off cause they need us more than we need them Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,583 Posted September 6, 2017 Loathe as I am to praise the Frogs right now, that's a pretty ignorant thought. Even though our idiot Politicians and Press didn't talk about it, The French basically have been kicking ass on the African Continent for a decade+ now. Thank God for that - there's a couple of ISIS/AQ spin-off groups that most experts say make the Tallyban look like Girl Scouts. - And Amurica sat on our hands and (apparently) had Black Hawk Down flashbacks. Even here is a great microcosm: We've got our usual ChickenHawks who freak the F out if someone runs into an idiot in France/Sweden - wherever. Meanwhile, Google: 1) Westgate Mall attack - Nairobi and/or 2) Chibok school girls. It's typically Amurican: Don't talk about anything we're not involved in. Then biitch that nobody else is involved in anything. no your right, France does stuff elsewhere, maybe it was Italy, I was simply making a reference to some conflict years ago, where I read France (or Italy maybe) was sending 2 literally 2 fighter jets to help, and I was trying to elude to that humorously France I believe has quite a bit of provincial interest in Africa 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,640 Posted September 6, 2017 I know it's a heartless pipe dream, but I actually do entertain the notion of WTF would happen if we just said "F it". We made an announcement to the world that we did our best, lost a shiit-ton of lives in the first Korean War. Did everything we could to build up SoKo and it's regional neighbors to defend themselves and... We're outie. It would take us a solid chunk of months to fully disengage, but we announce and start to do it. Let's face it - China in Charge would be a crapload better than who's in charge now. BUT - I can easily imagine lil Kim and his privileged few would absolutely HATE China taking over. Fock 'em. Let them deal with the headache. I bet Kim and Co would be on the first boat outta dodge - with about a BILLION dollars in looted NK cash. Hey - SK wouldn't be the first democracy subsumed by China - Hong Kong didn't exactly burst into flames and bloodshed. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,640 Posted September 6, 2017 Loathe as I am to praise the Frogs right now, that's a pretty ignorant thought. Even though our idiot Politicians and Press didn't talk about it, The French basically have been kicking ass on the African Continent for a decade+ now. Thank God for that - there's a couple of ISIS/AQ spin-off groups that most experts say make the Tallyban look like Girl Scouts. - And Amurica sat on our hands and (apparently) had Black Hawk Down flashbacks. Even here is a great microcosm: We've got our usual ChickenHawks who freak the F out if someone runs into an idiot in France/Sweden - wherever. Meanwhile, Google: 1) Westgate Mall attack - Nairobi and/or 2) Chibok school girls. It's typically Amurican: Don't talk about anything we're not involved in. Then biitch that nobody else is involved in anything. I like how you say America sat on its hands instead of Obama. And Hillary Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,485 Posted September 15, 2017 Why did Bill Clinton’s North Korea deal fail? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mobb_deep 917 Posted September 15, 2017 Still waiting for the "era of strategic patience" to end. Where ya at, Skeletor? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted April 28, 2018 We have an idiot in the WH who happened to put Tongan administration with zero foreign policy experience. Doesn't that give you the warm fuzzies? a classic Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 2,515 Posted April 28, 2018 a classic It seems like all he does is regurgitate talking points without doing any critical thinking. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted April 28, 2018 WTF is going on here? Christ I hope we're not headed for war. We can't really be, right? The consequences would be enormous! Trump will tweet us to victory. Don't worry scrote! Spoiler alert, nothing will happen. We have an idiot in the WH who happened to put Tongan administration with zero foreign policy experience. Doesn't that give you the warm fuzzies? I blame him for his rhetoric in possibly escalating things. Watching some guy last night who had worked int he Clinton admin and he was saying they had NK mothballing the program but they had cheated and this technology they are usig now is from Pakistan. If true I wonder why not tough talk towards Pakistan. Oh really? Trump's rhetoric has been completely reckless. What is the point? Don't make these threats unless you're willing to back them up. All you do is worsen the situation AND expose yourself as unable to act. Now if the dumbass actually DOES want to go to war - well that's even dumber. Millions will die. And that's assuming best case scenario where Russia or China don't get actively involved to prevent a unified Korea on their doorstep. So sorry drobs, but "idiot" doesn't cut it as a legit response here. No it doesn't. Stop with this stupid whataboutism crap. You're literally destroying this country. Obama was wrong on the red line in Syria. I said it at the time and I'll say it again now. Now what in the fock does that have to do with the US response to North Korea today, under a different administration? I mean is it really your belief that no administration can ever be questioned about how it handles any kind of international crisis because once Barack obama focked up??! Do you realize how stupid this is? These all aged well. Any of you ladies had a change of heart now that Daddy Trump has accomplished something no president in 60 years was able to get done? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 2,515 Posted April 28, 2018 These all aged well. Any of you ladies had a change of heart now that Daddy Trump has accomplished something no president in 60 years was able to get done? All the winning is absolutely KILLING them! Remember when their Lord and Savior Obama was supposed to do great things like this (but actually made things worse)? I'm sure you'll get a response after they've checked in with their liberal masters who will tell them what today's daily talking points are on this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted April 28, 2018 Well...... Google "List of countries Trump has alienated" and you'll find sections on Australia, Germany, the UK, and more. In short, Trump's entire foreign policy is America first, last, and in between. EVERY decision on trade, on taxes, on immigration, on foreign affairs will be made to benefit American workers and American families. EVERY decision. And he hasn't been polite or respectful about it really. I'm not energized enough to argue for against said foreign policy this morning, but we have to at least recognize that going that route does have potential trade offs like this. to the first bold And that is why Trump was elected in 2016 and will win in a landslide in 2020. Americans dgaf about Australia or Germany or UK or China or Mexico. Just as none of those countries gaf about America (unless there is a payday involved) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mobb_deep 917 Posted April 28, 2018 Moon seems to be doing some great work, in spite of our idiot in chief. But then again, NK doesnt have anywhere to test nukes anymore, so the timing is just a tad convenient. Will see how it all plays out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,640 Posted April 28, 2018 Yeah, I don't really know what's going on in this particular thread clusterfest. I've already said that if Trump has anything to do with a real and Lasting change on the peninsula, he should get the Peace Prize. However, one only need to go back to 2000 and then to 2007 to see that history has a way of repeating itself with these guys. It's one thing to make Broad aspirational pillow talk. It's quite another when it starts boiling down to the details. So, we'll see. Honestly, you have to wish everyone the best. Anybody hoping for Trump or the peace process whoever is responsible for it, to fail is an idiot. But, just based on prima facie, I think the process is going on more despite, not because of us. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,583 Posted April 29, 2018 so to sum up it hasn't happened in 70 years, with any other president for either Korea or US, but no its Trump, so it was going to happen this year regardless, he couldn't have in anyway done anything to help that along Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,640 Posted April 29, 2018 so to sum up it hasn't happened in 70 years, with any other president for either Korea or US, but no its Trump, so it was going to happen this year regardless, he couldn't have in anyway done anything to help that along Obama killed Bin Laden Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted April 29, 2018 Obama killed Bin Ladenwas he in the room? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,583 Posted April 29, 2018 Obama killed Bin Laden yep and thats the one thing positive he did in 8 years, and he did it in his first year Trump has majorly surpassed it in his first year Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,640 Posted April 29, 2018 was he in the room? I'm saying that Obama gets credit for that, but somehow Trump, who has been out front on N Korea from the beginning, gets none for what's going on there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,640 Posted April 29, 2018 yep and thats the one thing positive he did in 8 years, and he did it in his first year Trump has majorly surpassed it in his first year 2011. Took him three years, if he's getting credit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted April 29, 2018 I'm saying that Obama gets credit for that, but somehow Trump, who has been out front on N Korea from the beginning, gets none for what's going on there.I was being sarcastic, that was sniffles line when the north Korea peace story broke and the reason it had nothing to do with trump Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,640 Posted April 29, 2018 I was being sarcastic, that was sniffles line when the north Korea peace story broke and the reason it had nothing to do with trump Slotard is more retarded than ever. Watching him crumble is joyful. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,640 Posted April 29, 2018 yep and thats the one thing positive he did in 8 years, and he did it in his first year Trump has majorly surpassed it in his first year Actually, in many ways, his biggest thing was the fact that he stepped up a drone strikes literally tenfold. Any told Pakistan to go pound sand. I don't know if they had nude photos of Cheney or what, but Bush Co treated Pakistan with kid gloves. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted April 29, 2018 I was being sarcastic, that was sniffles line when the north Korea peace story broke and the reason it had nothing to do with trumpNot quite what I had stated. Im not surprised you dont understand what was actually said. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,380 Posted April 29, 2018 This thread sums up all the bored liberals. THEY KNOW JACK SH!T! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted April 29, 2018 Not quite what I had stated. Im not surprised you dont understand what was actually said.nuance ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites