Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
mighty_thor

Trump calling for tighter gun control laws

Recommended Posts

Trump on twitter:

 

Trump said he would talk to the NRA about not allowing "people on the terrorist watch list, or the no fly list, to buy guns."

 

Well done Donald. An idea that the Democrats have been touting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here we go........

 

The true Trump shows up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump on twitter:

 

Trump said he would talk to the NRA about not allowing "people on the terrorist watch list, or the no fly list, to buy guns."

 

Well done Donald. An idea that the Democrats have been touting.

 

But the Dems suck at negotiating, Donald makes the best deals!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump on twitter:

 

Trump said he would talk to the NRA about not allowing "people on the terrorist watch list, or the no fly list, to buy guns."

 

Well done Donald. An idea that the Democrats have been touting.

Sort of like Obama going from being against gay marriage his first term, to campaigning for it the second time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here we go........

 

The true Trump shows up.

You're going down kid, try to hold on to as much as you can now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im sure all the Trumpers will now do a 180 about this too and talk about how great he is.

Im sure he has also bashed Obama a bit for talking abut this right after Orlando.

 

Kudos if they can get it done though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump on twitter:

 

Trump said he would talk to the NRA about not allowing "people on the terrorist watch list, or the no fly list, to buy guns."

 

Well done Donald. An idea that the Democrats have been touting.

 

I think Donald should go to the next NRA event, get up on stage and start telling people about the restrictions he would like to place on gun buying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump is seeing his poll numbers drop and his unfavorable rise...

Fixed...also trying to turn the news away from the smacking he has received from Obama, Hillary, and Warren... As well as trying to get away from his own back patting and foolish words in the past several days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fixed...also trying to turn the news away from the smacking he has received from Obama, Hillary, and Warren... As well as trying to get away from his own back patting and foolish words in the past several days.

Heard that he went from almost even to down 12 points in the past two weeks. Hillary really only needs to sit back and let Trump talk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I think Donald should go to the next NRA event, get up on stage and start telling people about the restrictions he would like to place on gun buying.

Maybe Barry should have gone to an LTGB event in 2008 and told him he was against gay marriage? I don't remember that one, do you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're going down kid, try to hold on to as much as you can now.

 

Kid? , please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh okay well that totally takes the sting out of suggesting the president of the United States supported terrorist attacks on US soil and that all Muslims are terrorists.

 

Would this piece of sh1t just fock off already? <_<

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This legislation would not have stopped any of the terrorist attacks! Not Orlando, not Boston, not San Bernardino, none of them. None of them were on the Terror Watch List or the No Fly List when they committed their crime.

 

Americans are so stupid.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/bill-oreilly-takes-stunning-stance-154449244.html

 

 

Bill O'Reilly takes stunning stance on guns after Orlando massacre
Allan Smith,Business Insider 6 hours ago
Bill O'Reilly stunned many viewers Tuesday night when he called for some measures of gun control to be implemented after the terrorist attack in Orlando, Florida, that claimed the lives at least 49 people — the deadliest mass shooting in US history.
After criticizing liberal politicians for not being aggressive enough on the fight against the Islamic State terrorist group, the Fox News host addressed the "right-wing responsibility" after the attack carried out by 29-year-old Omar Mateen using an assault weapon and a handgun.
"There is too much gun crime in the USA, and high-powered weaponry is too easy to get," he said. "That's the fact. So let's deal with it. We all have the right to bear arms, but we don't have the right to buy and maintain mortars. Even if you feel threatened by gangsters or a New World Order. No bazookas, no Sherman tanks, no hand grenades."
"That's because the Second Amendment clearly states the government has a right to regulate militias, made up of individuals," he continued. "They have that right in the name of public safety. Therefore, Congress should debate what kind of weapons should be available for public sale. And the states, the individual states, should decide what kind of carry laws are good for their own people."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This legislation would not have stopped any of the terrorist attacks! Not Orlando, not Boston, not San Bernardino, none of them. None of them were on the Terror Watch List or the No Fly List when they committed their crime.

 

Americans are so stupid.

So that means we shouldn't do it?

They were also US citizens...so I expect you oppose Trumps push again for a ban on Muslims entering the country?

 

Its not the only for hung that should be done either

Making the lists netter...making sure when people have the red flags this guy did, that they are flagged in checks when trying to purchase weapons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How many days until Trump slips in a speech and rephrases it as not allowing Muslims to buy guns?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How many days until Trump slips in a speech and rephrases it as not allowing Muslims to buy guns?

Over/under at 2.5 days

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good. I'm for gun control. No one should have a weapon that can fire high velocity 45 rounds in 60 seconds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BAN SIG SAUER MCX !@#

 

Not quite the ring of AR-15, but still...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This legislation would not have stopped any of the terrorist attacks! Not Orlando, not Boston, not San Bernardino, none of them. None of them were on the Terror Watch List or the No Fly List when they committed their crime.

 

Americans are so stupid.

We need new lists. Ill start: No Members of a religion or cult that promotes or demands violence may own a weapon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We need new lists. Ill start: No Members of a religion or cult that promotes or demands violence may own a weapon.

Is a peemus considered a weapon? :ninja:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This legislation would not have stopped any of the terrorist attacks! Not Orlando, not Boston, not San Bernardino, none of them. None of them were on the Terror Watch List or the No Fly List when they committed their crime.

 

Americans are so stupid.

Exactly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is a peemus considered a weapon? :ninja:

Mine is with the help of the Pfizer corp.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good. I'm for gun control. No one should have a weapon that can fire high velocity 45 rounds in 60 seconds.

 

Thafuck is a high velocity 45 round?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love how gun whackos think that their nerdy knowledge of every gun and it's specs changes the fact that the general public is fully aware that changes need to be made.

 

"Criminals should not be able to walk in and buy a gun that fire 60 shots in a minute!!!"

"Actually, they can only fire 53 times in a minutes unless they have a Feargal converter and were manufactured before June of 2003, in which case, it would be 57.5 per minute' :rolleyes: :doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like the Dems in the Senate beat him to it...

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/orlando-nightclub-massacre/filibuster-ends-after-gop-agrees-allow-gun-control-votes-senator-n593396

 

Senate Democrats ended a nearly 15-hour filibuster early Thursday after Republican Party leaders reportedly agreed to allow votes on two proposed gun control measures.

Sen. Chris Murphy, a Democrat from Connecticut, said that a compromise had been reached. Votes would be held on whether to ban people on the government's terrorist watch list from obtaining gun licenses and whether to expand background checks to gun shows and internet sales, he added.

 

 

At least to get a vote...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love how gun whackos think that their nerdy knowledge of every gun and it's specs changes the fact that the general public is fully aware that changes need to be made.

 

"Criminals should not be able to walk in and buy a gun that fire 60 shots in a minute!!!"

"Actually, they can only fire 53 times in a minutes unless they have a Feargal converter and were manufactured before June of 2003, in which case, it would be 57.5 per minute' :rolleyes: :doh:

 

I love how the pinko-pussies think that just because they don't really understand anything about guns, still gives them the right to try to take them away from those who do, solely because their feels.

 

Get back to us when you can understand that the gun didn't kill anybody. One idiot, who used a gun for the wrong purpose, did.

Why is it you can't understand that very simple, very straight-forward concept??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Solely because their feels?

 

Yeah, thats why people want tighter controls on guns.

 

This, the gun didn't kill anybody copout BS is tired and old. Yes, the person behind the gun did it...the gun was designed for one purpose, to kill. This wasn't just one idiot who used a gun for the wrong purpose (and its the actual intended purpose of the gun actually). Its day after day...far too often.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I love how the pinko-pussies think that just because they don't really understand anything about guns, still gives them the right to try to take them away from those who do, solely because their feels.

 

 

 

Hmm. So if we can find someone that knows more about guns than you, that wants more gun control, will you defer to them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Get back to us when you can understand that the gun didn't kill anybody. One idiot, who used a gun for the wrong purpose, did.

 

The purpose of AR15s is to kill people. HTH!

 

Oh wait, I mean to kill deer. :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I love how the pinko-pussies think that just because they don't really understand anything about guns, still gives them the right to try to take them away from those who do, solely because their feels.

 

Get back to us when you can understand that the gun didn't kill anybody. One idiot, who used a gun for the wrong purpose, did.

Why is it you can't understand that very simple, very straight-forward concept??

Guns don't kill people blah blah blah... But every day you turn on the news and lo and behold....guns killed people. D'oh :doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I love how the pinko-pussies think that just because they don't really understand anything about guns, still gives them the right to try to take them away from those who do, solely because their feels.

 

Get back to us when you can understand that the gun didn't kill anybody. One idiot, who used a gun for the wrong purpose, did.

Why is it you can't understand that very simple, very straight-forward concept??

Ive put more rounds down range and cleaned and cared for more weapons than you ever ever will. I say that with confidence. We need better gun regulations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An AR 15 might have came in handy for those Jews who were rounded up and slaughtered by their government 50 years ago. At least it would have given them a fighting chance.

:dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An AR 15 might have came in handy for those Jews who were rounded up and slaughtered by their government 50 years ago. At least it would have given them a fighting chance.

:dunno:

If your government wants you dead, you're dead. All the guns in the world won't stop a drone strike. But gun manufacturers love a nice paranoid dummy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If your government wants you dead, you're dead. All the guns in the world won't stop a drone strike. But gun manufacturers love a nice paranoid dummy.

just stating facts, you hate those things

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×