Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
edjr

Has there been a worse team to win the (reg. season) NBA Eastern Conference

Recommended Posts

I kid...but utah isnt letting Hayward get out of utah. Think they can supermax him or something if i recall.

 

if he doesn't want to stay, he can request a sign and trade and the celtics can pay him supermax as well.

 

-80- million per year

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone in the East who plans on making the finals has about one more year to accomplish it and then the Sixers will have a stranglehold on the conference for years.

God focking dammit newbie...you get off one smart post in this thread i agree with and you cant let it sit there can you? You just gotta open that puddin head of yours and spew out something insane like the Sixers.

Like a god damned arsonist...gets away with it, gets away with it...cant help self....flicks more matches.

:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

God focking dammit newbie...you get off one smart post in this thread i agree with and you cant let it sit there can you? You just gotta open that puddin head of yours and spew out something insane like the Sixers.

Like a god damned arsonist...gets away with it, gets away with it...cant help self....flicks more matches.

:)

 

:clap:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

God focking dammit newbie...you get off one smart post in this thread i agree with and you cant let it sit there can you? You just gotta open that puddin head of yours and spew out something insane like the Sixers.

Like a god damned arsonist...gets away with it, gets away with it...cant help self....flicks more matches.

:)

Trust the process

 

But seriously, a lot has to do with Embid staying healthy. With him, Simmons, and Saric, they make the playoffs next season. If they hit on their early draft pick this year, they contend for the eastern title in two.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trust the process

Haha....Embid was funny this year going along with the crowd chanting "Trust the process!!" (Clap...clap...clap clap clap)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They have a decent shot at it. Need some luck. Those OKC teams with Durant Harden and Westbrook Ibaka couldnt do it but had the roster

How long were those 4 actually together?

 

I guess 3 starting with hardens rookie yr?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that went well.

 

do #1 conference seeds typically get dominated in the 1st game of the conference finals?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that went well.

 

do #1 conference seeds typically get dominated in the 1st game of the conference finals?

That game was an embarrassment to basketball, so, I'd hope not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That game was an embarrassment to basketball, so, I'd hope not.

 

I did watch the 1st 7 or 8 mins, these games starts way to late for me to watch.

 

Olynyk on Lebron worked out well for the Celtics early. Is that the solid coaching I heard about Stevens?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thomas' contract is up soon, he's going to want a max deal.

 

Thomas, Heyward and Horford

 

can they win a title?

 

depending on who they draft and if Jaylen Brown keeps progressing.

 

I say yes

Since you don't watch any NBA, your opinion is baseless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since you don't watch any NBA, your opinion is baseless.

 

Olynyk on Lebron was good coaching?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I may have been wrong about 4 Celtics making the Cleveland roster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Olynyk on Lebron was good coaching?

Olynyk was not guarding Lebron. Smart was not guarding Love. Those matchups happened due to switches on picks. If you knew basketball, you might know that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Olynyk on Lebron was good coaching?

Boston was flat horrific on guarding screens. They didnt fight through or go under to make LeBron shoot, didnt hedge or jump them...it was one of the worst efforts ive seen.

 

They just lazily switched every time. Thus you got these weird matchups trip after trip. It was really bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Boston was flat horrific on guarding screens. They didnt fight through or go under to make LeBron shoot, didnt hedge or jump them...it was one of the worst efforts ive seen.

 

They just lazily switched every time. Thus you got these weird matchups trip after trip. It was really bad.

They tried to not switch as well, but that resulted in an even quicker basket. Celts looked tired as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Olynyk was not guarding Lebron. Smart was not guarding Love. Those matchups happened due to switches on picks. If you knew basketball, you might know that.

 

3 times in a row down the court :doh:

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Almost every trip down the court.

 

3 times in a row Olynyk was on Lebron who walked in for an easy lay up.

 

Celtics blow and have no business being a #1 seed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember these as a kid

 

 

 

 

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

3 times in a row Olynyk was on Lebron who walked in for an easy lay up.

 

Celtics blow and have no business being a #1 seed.

 

I know that you don't follow basketball, but let me explain how the seeding works. It is not voted on. It is purely based on who had the better record in the conference. The Celtics had a better regular season record than the Cavs. So, as a result, they get the #1 seed. Got it?

 

Now, I don't think that there is anyone that is saying that the Celtics have a better team than the Cavs. It is not even close on paper. However, that has absolutely no bearing on how they do the seeding in the NBA. Now, in college...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I know that you don't follow basketball, but let me explain how the seeding works. It is not voted on. It is purely based on who had the better record in the conference. The Celtics had a better regular season record than the Cavs. So, as a result, they get the #1 seed. Got it?

 

Now, I don't think that there is anyone that is saying that the Celtics have a better team than the Cavs. It is not even close on paper. However, that has absolutely no bearing on how they do the seeding in the NBA. Now, in college...

 

 

Realize the thread you're in?

 

Has there been a worse team to win the (reg. season) NBA Eastern Conference

 

 

Nope. there hasn't

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Look up the 2001-2002 New Jersey Nets

 

Made it to the NBA Finals.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Made it to the NBA Finals.

 

Oh, so that is the only criteria? Look to the 14-15 Hawks. Same thing. Cavs in 2nd place, but destroyed Atlanta.

 

There are lots of situations where this happens, but you can go back to listening to the fellowship of the miserable and hop off the bandwagon. We know that you are a pink hat anyway. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Oh, so that is the only criteria? Look to the 14-15 Hawks. Same thing. Cavs in 2nd place, but destroyed Atlanta.

 

There are lots of situations where this happens, but you can go back to listening to the fellowship of the miserable and hop off the bandwagon. We know that you are a pink hat anyway. :lol:

 

Guess what the 14/15 hawks and the celts have in common?

 

that marshallow sawft stiff Al Horford.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Guess what the 14/15 hawks and the celts have in common?

 

that marshallow sawft stiff Al Horford.

They have lots of holes in their roster. I was actually fine with them considering Butler for Crowder and the #1 pick. Crowder is a bit player. They have a bunch of 2nd tier players and they are built for the regular season. Need a center and a forward. Not sure that either of those are available in the draft this year. I like how Brown is maturing, but he is still a couple of years away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

They have lots of holes in their roster. I was actually fine with them considering Butler for Crawford and the #1 pick. Crawford is a bit player. They have a bunch of 2nd tier players and they are built for the regular season. Need a center and a forward. Not sure that either of those are available in the draft this year. I like how Brown is maturing, but he is still a couple of years away.

 

they have the Nets #1 pick next year :lol: nice trade baryshnikov.

 

Will the Bulls take the #1 this year for Butler or the Pacers take the # this year and next year for Paul George? (assuming he signs with us)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

they have the Nets #1 pick next year :lol: nice trade baryshnikov.

 

Will the Bulls take the #1 this year for Butler or the Pacers take the # this year and next year for Paul George? (assuming he signs with us)

I think that both George and Butler are possibilities for the #1 this year. I don't think that either would require the #1 next year as well. I think that Butler would be on the Celtics right now if there was more certainty that the pick was going to be #1 overall. The rumor was that the Celtics did not want to part with Crowder and the #1 pick for Butler at the deadline and that is just crazy. I would have helped Crowder pack his bags.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I think that both George and Butler are possibilities for the #1 this year. I don't think that either would require the #1 next year as well. I think that Butler would be on the Celtics right now if there was more certainty that the pick was going to be #1 overall. The rumor was that the Celtics did not want to part with Crawford and the #1 pick for Butler at the deadline and that is just crazy. I would have helped Crawford pack his bags.

 

I like George more, I'd give up both #1s for him (if he signed long term), not Butler.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Realize the thread you're in?

 

 

 

Nope. there hasn't

there have been #1s who have lost in the first round.

They are worse

:doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

there have been #1s who have lost in the first round.

They are worse

:doh:

 

Name one that happened in the Eastern Conference when it was a full season?

 

 

Being the #1 seed in a strike shortened doesn't tell me anything

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Name one that happened in the Eastern Conference when it was a full season?

 

 

Being the #1 seed in a strike shortened doesn't tell me anything

second round?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

second round?

 

naturally i am sure a ton have lost in the 2nd round.

 

This is all semantics

 

you knew, I knew, everyone knew the celtics are a flawed #1 seed and only the #1 seed because the Cavs didn't care about it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

naturally i am sure a ton have lost in the 2nd round.

 

This is all semantics

 

you knew, I knew, everyone knew the celtics are a flawed #1 seed and only the #1 seed because the Cavs didn't care about it

 

Truth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

naturally i am sure a ton have lost in the 2nd round.

 

This is all semantics

 

you knew, I knew, everyone knew the celtics are a flawed #1 seed and only the #1 seed because the Cavs didn't care about it

agree, doesn't make them the worst ever though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

agree, doesn't make them the worst ever though.

 

I was reacting to them being down 0 - 2 to the freakin Rondo lead Bulls.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If (when) the Cavs win game 2 Bawstan shouldn't even bother getting on the plane for Cleveland

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't recall anything this embarrassing in my 25-30 years watching the NBA. Boston would have been better off losing a close series to a healthy Rondo led Bulls..

 

Indiana got swept but, at least they made the games interesting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't recall anything this embarrassing in my 25-30 years watching the NBA. Boston would have been better off losing a close series to a healthy Rondo led Bulls..

Indiana got swept but, at least they made the games interesting.

They did nothing different with on ball screens.....nothing. I can't fathom this at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×