RLLD 3,455 Posted December 28, 2018 According to a document about the case, the male student was deemed to have violated civil-rights law — and was guilty of sexual harassment — because he asked a female student out on a date that she did not want. Why? Because he was bigger than her, and his “physical size” meant that “he was perceived as having power over her.” https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/12/student-found-to-have-violated-title-ix-by-asking-another-student-on-a-date/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bandrus1 413 Posted December 28, 2018 The article accurately quoted the deposition of the Title IX case, but it left out relevant details. In fact, the male student had made repeated, unwelcome advances toward the female student and was found in violation of Title IX for stalking her. He is suing the university and alleging that its Title IX office engaged in arbitrary enforcement and racial discrimination, but his lawsuit does not contest the fact pattern left out of this article. We are retracting the article and we regret the error Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 3,455 Posted December 28, 2018 The article accurately quoted the deposition of the Title IX case, but it left out relevant details. In fact, the male student had made repeated, unwelcome advances toward the female student and was found in violation of Title IX for stalking her. He is suing the university and alleging that its Title IX office engaged in arbitrary enforcement and racial discrimination, but his lawsuit does not contest the fact pattern left out of this article. We are retracting the article and we regret the error Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Patriotsfatboy1 1,432 Posted December 28, 2018 If I were to ask out a girl larger than me, then I would be guilty of a Title IX violation as well - Hogging. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,626 Posted December 28, 2018 Why are places like Harvard and Yale still getting federal funding? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Djgb13 2,338 Posted December 28, 2018 The article accurately quoted the deposition of the Title IX case, but it left out relevant details. In fact, the male student had made repeated, unwelcome advances toward the female student and was found in violation of Title IX for stalking her. He is suing the university and alleging that its Title IX office engaged in arbitrary enforcement and racial discrimination, but his lawsuit does not contest the fact pattern left out of this article. We are retracting the article and we regret the error Hm...interesting. So he kept pursuing her until she said yes? Kind of creepy but not illegal. What were the examples of the stalking? Cause girls nowadays have been throwing that around when there wasnt really any evidence of said stalking. Im just curious as to what shes saying the stalking was. Not saying shes wrong but I am curious as to all the details. Too many knee jerk reactions nowadays without all the details Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 3,455 Posted December 28, 2018 Hm...interesting. So he kept pursuing her until she said yes? Kind of creepy but not illegal. What were the examples of the stalking? Cause girls nowadays have been throwing that around when there wasnt really any evidence of said stalking. Im just curious as to what shes saying the stalking was. Not saying shes wrong but I am curious as to all the details. Too many knee jerk reactions nowadays without all the details I think if she said more than no thank you, like said stay away from me, or leave me alone, or stop talking to me etc....and he kept it up, then she has some reason....yeah? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Patriotsfatboy1 1,432 Posted December 28, 2018 I think if she said more than no thank you, like said stay away from me, or leave me alone, or stop talking to me etc....and he kept it up, then she has some reason....yeah? It could be that he called her "sir" instead of "ma'am". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sderk 1,040 Posted December 28, 2018 I don't get how this was considered "Notice of Investigation of Potential Sex Discrimination,”. Sounds like just the opposite. Creepy guy won't leave a chick alone because he is hot for her. And her first mistake when he asked her out the first time was to say 'no' because she was "busy all week." Put a restraining order on the guy or fire him and move on. Title 9? Whatever. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sderk 1,040 Posted December 28, 2018 Hm...interesting. So he kept pursuing her until she said yes? Kind of creepy but not illegal. What were the examples of the stalking? Cause girls nowadays have been throwing that around when there wasnt really any evidence of said stalking. Im just curious as to what shes saying the stalking was. Not saying shes wrong but I am curious as to all the details. Too many knee jerk reactions nowadays without all the details There is a link in the page to a court document outlining details. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 3,455 Posted December 28, 2018 It could be that he called her "sir" instead of "ma'am". Cannot be ruled out.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,484 Posted December 28, 2018 Why are places like Harvard and Yale still getting federal funding? And Why dont the Universities back their own student loans? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted December 28, 2018 No crime against persistence. Until now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,626 Posted December 28, 2018 And Why dont the Universities back their own student loans? Now that would be something. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lickin_starfish 1,480 Posted December 28, 2018 And Why dont the Universities back their own student loans? As a father of two college students, and soon to be a 3rd, I can attest that the loan process is a giant clusterfudge of epic proportions. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 5,890 Posted December 28, 2018 The article accurately quoted the deposition of the Title IX case, but it left out relevant details. In fact, the male student had made repeated, unwelcome advances toward the female student and was found in violation of Title IX for stalking her. He is suing the university and alleging that its Title IX office engaged in arbitrary enforcement and racial discrimination, but his lawsuit does not contest the fact pattern left out of this article. We are retracting the article and we regret the error lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 2,513 Posted December 28, 2018 lol Aren't you the retard that started the knee-jerk "TRUMP DIDN'T VISIT THE TROOPS!!!! WAHHHHH! ORANGE MAN BAD!!!!" thread only to find out that he actually did visit the troops? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 5,890 Posted December 28, 2018 Aren't you the retard that started the knee-jerk "TRUMP DIDN'T VISIT THE TROOPS!!!! WAHHHHH! ORANGE MAN BAD!!!!" thread only to find out that he actually did visit the troops? Tilt Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 2,513 Posted December 28, 2018 Tilt Tilt is the guy who knee-jerks a post only to look like an idiot once again. That would be you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites