TimHauck
Members-
Content Count
17,074 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
11
TimHauck last won the day on March 2
TimHauck had the most liked content!
Community Reputation
1,749 ExcellentAbout TimHauck
- Currently Viewing Topic: Trump INDICTED
-
Rank
FF Geek
Recent Profile Visitors
8,168 profile views
-
Yup, it’s ridiculous to single out Jon Stewart because of the natural result of the real estate market. But what Trump did had nothing to do with the natural result of the real estate market.
-
Key Bridge in Baltimore struck by ship-collapses
TimHauck replied to Fireballer's topic in The Geek Club
You presented links to some randos getting interviewed, that’s not “proof.” -
1) I pretty much answered the question in my reply to @Engorgeous George. But it’s still wrong and not even remotely similar to what Jon Stewart “did.” 2) Didn’t you post the link to the 92 page document when you were talking with @The Real timschochet ? But OK, here ya go, as I stated the Mar a Lago piece is on page 67, where the focus is more on Trump valuing it as a personal residence when it is not able to be used as a personal residence https://ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/trump-decision.pdf 3) You said MUCH of James’s case was based on tax valuations, which is clearly not true. Even in the document you shared, there were sections for 6 other properties (Trump Tower Triplex, Seven Springs Estate, Trump Park Avenue, 40 Wall Street, Aberdeen, US Golf Clubs). Mar a Lago was the only one that mentioned a tax appraisal, which once again was not included in the final decision. Clearly it wasn’t much of her argument, this case is not even remotely similar to Jon Stewart selling a property for higher than the tax value. You’re wrong.
-
As it should have been…
-
Never said you did. But apparently @Strike and much of right wing twitter are
-
This is probably true, and yeah it’s probably true that many others are doing similar things without being taken to court. But it’s still wrong, and not remotely similar to someone selling their property for higher than the tax value.
-
That is only in the summary judgement. I don’t see any reference to the tax valuation of Mar a Lago in the final 92 page document (it is discussed on page 67). And even in the summary judgement that is the only property where the tax valuation is referenced, yet you said that’s what MUCH of her case was based on. It’s okay, you can admit you were wrong.
-
Key Bridge in Baltimore struck by ship-collapses
TimHauck replied to Fireballer's topic in The Geek Club
Found another guy that watched the twitter clip that was sped up to 100x -
What @Mike Honcho just said. Will you at least admit you were wrong that James’ case was not based on TAX valuations? If not then there’s no use conversing with you.
-
The winner of the backtracking competition is… @Strike!!
-
I’ll admit I haven’t followed every detail of the case, but I can guaranfockingtee they didn’t get a judgement based on TAX valuations. It’s because he lied to lenders/banks. What I mentioned earlier was that it was discovered that he also lied about the occupancy rates of his buildings, which could have had an impact on taxes.
-
Do you think what Trump did is remotely similar to a property being assessed by the government at a lower value than it’s actual market value?
-
March 18 2:30 PM: spokesman says Ohtani paid debts for Mizuhara March 20 8:32 AM: spokesman says Ippei is lying
-
Conservatives are really riding this Jon Stewart thing. Posobiec, Catturd, Jimmy Dore, Robby Starbuck, Charlie Kirk, the Gateway Pundit, the NY Post etc all reading off the same script. Holy fock they’re dumb.