ChickenLittle
Members-
Content Count
132 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Community Reputation
0 NeutralAbout ChickenLittle
-
Rank
FF Geek
Contact Methods
-
Website URL
http://
-
ICQ
0
-
Driver. The Lions have been having some issues lately. vote on mine: http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=297970
-
I'll add one more ... Drop the Ravens and grab SD
-
I think it's fair. Westbrook is the Eagles only option at this point. Edwards and Ward are better than Harrison. It favors the Player 2, but I don't think it's worthy of a veto consider the history of Harrison and LJ. I'm the commish of my league and as long as there are no obvious signs of collusion I don't veto. You can't protect people from being stupid. If you don't mind a vote: http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=297970
-
Rumor has it Indy is going to go back to more of an RBBC so it's not a bad trade. Campbell can't hit Moss on the deep routes, so I actually like the deal. See mine if you don't mind http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=297970
-
I wish I knew ... hopefully next year
-
That's not a horrible trade considering the situation in STL, but watch out later in the year and move Moss if NE starts running when the weather gets bad. Here's mine: http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=297970
-
If you need a starter this week Edwards is your only choice. Lemon has a horrible matchup and has to fly to England on top of it. The others probably won't even play this week. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=297970
-
I'd do it if you can keep Edwards and give him either holmes or curtis instead. Otherwise I think you're giving up too much http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=297970
-
Thanks for mine ... If Lewis is out go with Wright, but otherwise I'd run the Indy combo. The carries were almost even and there was a report today that Marvin is seriously considering going back to the 2 back system like last year.
-
I don't like giving up Jones-Drew with Taylor probably leaving after this year, but all in all I think it's good considering the year Marvin is having and his age Wayne could be the #1 target in Indy next year. I'd also hang on to Norwood. I think that ATL will have a real QB next year (one way or another) and his value could go way up ... forgot my link: http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=297970
-
Dynasty owner looking at rebuilding for next year as I am 1-5 ... Would you do this trade? My Team (players that matter anyway): QB - Manning, Schaub RB - Jackson, Norwood, Barber, Leonard WR - Re. Brown, Coles, Colston, Curry I give up: Peyton Manning I get: Hasselbeck, Jones-Drew, Evans, Cal Johnson For a point of reference Manning and Hasselbeck are rated 3 and 6 respectfully in my league to this point.
-
Counter him with Boldin ... I wouldn't give up Williams. STL is more or less dead and I can see them shutting Jackson down if they are still 0-fer once he's healthy.
-
Hate to do this, but ... Anyone else?
-
Good points as Indy does have a tougher schedule down the road. The Carr/Vinny thing is a little scary. I'd still hold off on this one and look for a team that is lacking at WR since you could probably still get a top 10 RB for Chad or a top 5 RB and steady WR for a Chad/Gore combo. With things as they are in SF I really don't think you can count on Gore this year. Even without Chad you'll be fine at WR. Having a REAL WR in SD will help Gates as teams won't be able to commit a Safety over the top with Chambers on the outside.
-
Need one of these WW WRs for this week....
ChickenLittle replied to rottytiny's topic in A Little Help!
Thanks for mine ... With Chambers in SD I'd drop Jackson ... they don't throw to the WRs too often to begin with and now they have a real #1. I'd hang on to Leonard or trade him to the SJax owner for another backup RB As far as your pickup goes it depends on what you want. I'd go with Hilliard if you're just looking for some steady points. If you want to take a chance go for Walter at least for this week until we see if last week was a fluke.