Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Mike Honcho

Giuliani says Trump didn't collude with Russia but can't say if campaign aides did.

Recommended Posts

 

CNN

 

Rudy Giuliani said Wednesday that he never denied President Donald Trump's campaign colluded with the Russian government during the 2016 campaign, only that the President himself was not involved in collusion.

 

In an interview with CNN's Chris Cuomo on "Cuomo Prime Time," Giuliani, a former New York mayor and Trump's attorney, said he doesn't know if other people in the campaign, including former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, were working with the Kremlin during the 2016 presidential race.

"I never said there was no collusion between the campaign, or people in the campaign," Giuliani said.

 

He added, "I said the President of the United States. There is not a single bit of evidence the President of the United States committed the only crime you can commit here, conspiring with the Russians to hack the DNC."

 

 

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

Russia started their anti-US campaign in 2014, long before I announced that I would run for President. The results of the election were not impacted. The Trump campaign did nothing wrong - no collusion!

 

 

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

“Democrats can’t find a Smocking Gun tying the Trump campaign to Russia after James Comey’s testimony. No Smocking Gun...No Collusion.” @FoxNews That’s because there was NO COLLUSION. So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction, wrongly call it a campaign contribution,..

 

 

 

Looks like someone is laying the groundwork for an "I didn't know it was going on" defense.

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

suddenly comes after the meuller investigation showed the manafort, Trump team all the evidence they have. Including 800 pages of redacted evidence that the media can't see. Whatever is in those 800 pages got Rudy's butt to puckering pretty tight.

 

The only question now is whose first? Kushner or Don Jr.

 

We also know that manafort was providing private internal polling data to Russia. Why would you possibly do that? There's no good answer for that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So who was the Russian(s) they colluded with? Mifsud? Nope....FBI asset. Halper? Nope....FBI asset. Bueller.....Bueller....Bueller.

 

Bonus round....Russian Oligharch was approached by FBI to join effort against Trump but he laughed them off stating what they're saying wasn't true.

 

Russian Collusion existed but it was Hillary and Obama Intell Comm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We also know that manafort was providing private internal polling data to Russia. Why would you possibly do that? There's no good answer for that.

Is providing privately obtained data illegal? Could be. I don't know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hate to ruin your day, but they actually named the Russian that manafort was dealing with. Turns out, he is besties with Putin himself. Olipaska?

 

Also explains why Trump is destroying notes from his meetings with Putin.

 

In related news, Trump met with Putin in Germany one on one, then literally from air Force One, called a New York times reporter to say that the Russians did nothing wrong. does that not sound like he is just doing Putin's bidding at that point?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hate to ruin your day, but they actually named the Russian that manafort was dealing with. Turns out, he is besties with Putin himself. Olipaska?

 

Also explains why Trump is destroying notes from his meetings with Putin.

 

In related news, Trump met with Putin in Germany one on one, then literally from air Force One, called a New York times reporter to say that the Russians did nothing wrong. does that not sound like he is just doing Putin's bidding at that point?

Deripaska and Manafort aren't cohorts. Manafort screwed the guy over on some deal years ago. Deripaska was another FBI asset.

 

Swing and a wiff.

 

Bonus round: Why did Democrats BLOCK Deripaska from testifying before Congress? Dirty Mark Warner, Schifforbrains.....they blocked him. WHY?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hate to ruin your day, but they actually named the Russian that manafort was dealing with. Turns out, he is besties with Putin himself. Olipaska?

 

Also explains why Trump is destroying notes from his meetings with Putin.

 

In related news, Trump met with Putin in Germany one on one, then literally from air Force One, called a New York times reporter to say that the Russians did nothing wrong. does that not sound like he is just doing Putin's bidding at that point?

Have we actually seen trump in putin in the same Room? Wouldnt that be some scooby doo shiit if at the end of this he pulls off the mask and hes really been putin this whole time like his entire life.

 

Fockin meddling Democrats

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You know it's true. Because Trump shorted yet another vendor. LOL

 

 

President Donald Trump's former "fixer" Michael Cohen paid the head of a small technology company thousands in 2015 to rig online polls and elevate Cohen's character to benefit Trump's presidential campaign, The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday.

 

According to the paper, Cohen paid John Gauger, the owner of RedFinch Solutions LLC, between $12,000 and $13,000 for activities related to Trump's campaign, including "trying unsuccessfully to manipulate two online polls in Mr. Trump's favor" and creating a Twitter account called "@WomenForCohen" that "praised (Cohen's) looks and character, and promoted his appearances and statements boosting" Trump's candidacy.

 

In making the claim, Gauger told the paper he wasn't fully paid for the work, though the Journal said Cohen was reimbursed $50,000 -- the amount the two originally agreed on for Gauger's services -- by the Trump Organization. Gauger, according to the paper, also received a boxing glove "worn by a Brazilian mixed-martial arts fighter" along with the cash payment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You know it's true. Because Trump shorted yet another vendor. LOL

 

 

President Donald Trump's former "fixer" Michael Cohen paid the head of a small technology company thousands in 2015 to rig online polls and elevate Cohen's character to benefit Trump's presidential campaign, The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday.

 

According to the paper, Cohen paid John Gauger, the owner of RedFinch Solutions LLC, between $12,000 and $13,000 for activities related to Trump's campaign, including "trying unsuccessfully to manipulate two online polls in Mr. Trump's favor" and creating a Twitter account called "@WomenForCohen" that "praised (Cohen's) looks and character, and promoted his appearances and statements boosting" Trump's candidacy.

 

In making the claim, Gauger told the paper he wasn't fully paid for the work, though the Journal said Cohen was reimbursed $50,000 -- the amount the two originally agreed on for Gauger's services -- by the Trump Organization. Gauger, according to the paper, also received a boxing glove "worn by a Brazilian mixed-martial arts fighter" along with the cash payment.

 

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, in filthy's world, everybody is an FBI plant. 😁

 

Kilimnik too?

 

(Watch this)

Truth hurts princess?

 

Link any one of those I mentioned that was wrong.

 

:wave:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The funniest part about filthy's misguided beliefs is that there are now 26 different indictments against individual Russians. You know what they don't do when you have a paid or otherwise informant? You don't then wait a couple years and indict them for working for the FBI. It just doesn't work that way.😄

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Truth hurts princess?

 

Link any one of those I mentioned that was wrong.

 

:wave:

 

Why should he, I 100% proved you wrong before(climate change US trillions), you changed the subject and kept on repeating the same untruths?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Poor Honcho and Wiff. :( at least Saints and Sho had the decency to leave.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Poor Honcho and Wiff. :( at least Saints and Sho had the decency to leave.

 

You guys should watch the Gillette commercial...you have completely emasculated Wiff and me. :cry:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is still a thing? I thought it was last years obsession. And the year before. We're going to get year 3 of this? Change the channel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does Giuliani represent everyone on the campaign does he just represent trump ?

If he just represents trump why would he and how could he speak for anyone else. :doh:

 

Total fake news fake outrage nonsense by the usual orange man bad :mad: TDS suffering mental cases.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does Giuliani represent everyone on the campaign does he just represent trump ?

If he just represents trump why would he and how could he speak for anyone else. :doh:

 

Total fake news fake outrage nonsense by the usual orange man bad :mad: TDS suffering mental cases.

This is how they "caught" everyone else. Vague questions they already knew the answers to.

 

Have you ever had contact with Russian agents?

 

No I don't think so.

 

Aaaaaaaaha! You once met with someone from Russia 3 years ago at a dinner party!!!

 

CNN - Trump associate lie about Russian connection!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is still a thing? I thought it was last years obsession. And the year before. We're going to get year 3 of this? Change the channel.

Oh, you do realize the Republicans open the in another investigation into Hillary's email gate? That was number eight I believe. And then very quietly shut it down for lack of evidence. That just happened by the way. And you're worried about a two-year investigation involving up to now 33 different indictments and plea deals?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, you do realize the Republicans open the in another investigation into Hillary's email gate? That was number eight I believe. And then very quietly shut it down for lack of evidence. That just happened by the way. And you're worried about a two-year investigation involving up to now 33 different indictments and plea deals?

Yawn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Eight different investigations into Hillary, but but but we need it!😵

 

Two years investigating Donald Trump defrauding his way into the White House and colluding with a hostile foreign power leading to 33 indictments and or guilty pleas and rising. "God, is that still going on?"

😤

 

🙄

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Eight different investigations into Hillary, but but but we need it!😵

 

Two years investigating Donald Trump defrauding his way into the White House and colluding with a hostile foreign power leading to 33 indictments and or guilty pleas and rising. "God, is that still going on?"

😤

 

🙄

defrauding ?

 

 

:lol:

 

 

 

 

 

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Eight different investigations into Hillary, but but but we need it!

 

Two years investigating Donald Trump defrauding his way into the White House and colluding with a hostile foreign power leading to 33 indictments and or guilty pleas and rising. "God, is that still going on?"

 

 

 

 

And yet not a single indictment or conviction of Trump. That was the main goal from the left, and it fell well short.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Eight different investigations into Hillary, but but but we need it!😵

 

Two years investigating Donald Trump defrauding his way into the White House and colluding with a hostile foreign power leading to 33 indictments and or guilty pleas and rising. "God, is that still going on?"

😤

 

🙄

Do you people continue to forget the Benghazi investigation is where it was discovered that Hillary was using a private server? Why do you continue to act like there was nothing discovered? It only changed the outcome of a presidential election.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you people continue to forget the Benghazi investigation is where it was discovered that Hillary was using a private server? Why do you continue to act like there was nothing discovered? It only changed the outcome of a presidential election.

 

Even the puppets in the FBI admitted she broke the law, but she was super sorry about it and didn't weally mean it so they decided not to send it to the DOJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you people continue to forget the Benghazi investigation is where it was discovered that Hillary was using a private server? Why do you continue to act like there was nothing discovered? It only changed the outcome of a presidential election.

How many indictments, pleas?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

And yet not a single indictment or conviction of Trump. That was the main goal from the left, and it fell well short.

I know you're not that stupid. Is the guy you start from the bottom and work your way up, not the other way around.

 

Oh and by the way, Trump is listed as the unindicted co-conspirator along with Cohen. Remember that? Which means they already have him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know you're not that stupid. Is the guy you start from the bottom and work your way up, not the other way around.

 

Oh and by the way, Trump is listed as the unindicted co-conspirator along with Cohen. Remember that? Which means they already have him.

I'm going to go with the same standard of proof that the left went with Hillary: conviction or it didn't happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How many indictments, pleas?

The crime was uncovered , the tainted and talentless FBI didn't charge her. That doesn't mean a crime wasn't discovered. If I were you I wouldn't commit myself to this line of logic. It might just backfire on you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today, I view it as Hillary being cleared 8 times, whereas Trump hasnt been cleared even once yet.

Asking of both people: Cleared of what crime?

 

Hillary's action were criminal per Comey. Email server, Uranium One, and Clinton foundation investigations active with a fresh OPEN set of eyes.

 

Trump......what crime is he being investigated for?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Asking of both people: Cleared of what crime?

 

Hillary's action were criminal per Comey. Email server, Uranium One, and Clinton foundation investigations active with a fresh OPEN set of eyes.

 

Trump......what crime is he being investigated for?

Hillary: Poor record keeping

Trump: Treason

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×